-
Posts
31409 -
Joined
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Anastasis
-
-
1 minute ago, bolverk said:
Setting aside the merits (or lack thereof) for the allegations from 3-4 different women, after what the Republicans did to Merrick Garland, they have forfeited their right to bitch about tactics and partisanship. Where do you assholes get off thinking that this "political theater" is beyond the pale? Y'all not only lowered the bar in 2016, you fucking snapped it in half and tossed it aside. You can all go get fucked.
The Democrats are going to rawdog the GOP so FFFFF'n hard and use their tears as lube when they take total control.
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
This is a legitimate question and there are a few reasonable explanations.
1. Background checks typically only go back to the age of 18 so Dr. Ford’s allegation wouldn’t have been detected.
2. They didn’t really look for this because it was so far back and the persons with knowledge of the bad behavior would have been too far removed from Kavanaugh at the time of the check.
3. Kavanaugh’s circle of associates did a good job of covering for him when questioned if they had any knowledge of bad behavior. Typical good old boy network.
Surprising that the FBI never looked into this Bart O'Kavanaugh character. That guys sounds like bad news.
-
Holy shot.
-
Horseshit.
-
Totally clowned.
-
11 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:
LOL. Maybe she’s can testify as to how she knows he was a virgin before. How? He was really really shitty at fucking. Maybe Lindsey Graham can do the questioning on that issue.
Lindsey aint gonna give you anything informative unless it involves butt fucking,
-
-
Just now, DDD Dad said:
#bolverkbatsignal
@bolverk and his taste is women is all good with me man. he likes them lean and mean.
-
1
-
-
The weapon turned out to be a BB gun, investigators said.
-
3 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:
Sad was this girl I knew in law school who was 28 and still a virgin. Outwardly, she had no reason to be in that...position. She was plenty good looking.
But crazy as fuck. I mean, super ultra religious on top of natural crazy.
Dunnow if she ever married, but if she did, that guy probably got the shit fucked out of him on his wedding night.
/csb.
A batshit crazy female law student. You don't say.
-
Can we get the chick who popped his cherry to testify.
-
1
-
-
On 9/7/2018 at 3:06 PM, 4th&Five said:
The hardest part of the whole thing might be following all the directions on the sperm test.
Jesus you ain't lying. That's that some rocket surgery shit.
-
Just now, Quagmire said:
Just don’t masturbate during the race and you’ll be fine
was that wrong?
-
Just now, Huckleberry said:
I think (or thought) we were talking about the Deborah Ramírez accusation.
I may have fucked that up. Multitasking conference call and shit. Can someone clarify which of the sexual assault allegations we are talking about. [/yesthatiswhereweareat]
-
Just now, Huckleberry said:
I didn't mischaracterize your position. You have now made multiple posts focusing on the fact that the only alleged direct eyewitnesses who responded state that it didn't happen. That is completely uninformative given that they are accused of participating in a sexual assault. My question to you is why you seem to be hung up on that fact to the point of believing it calls into question the credibility of the allegation. A denial calls into question the credibility of an accusation exactly as much as the allegation calls into question the credibility of the denial. So I ask again, do you find a denial of a sexual assault claim interesting?
PJ as well as the female that Ford named were witnesses that could place Kavanaugh at the party with Ford. They are not accused of participating in sexual assault, and they all say that the party didn't happen.
-
12 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:
This is the truly ironic part.... They're going to let Donald Trump destroy their party for a decade or more...
I'll take the over.
-
19 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
He's trolling right?
-
5 minutes ago, cabowabo said:
Would several trips to Boystown, Nuevo Laredo in the early 1990's present a problem during a Supreme Court confirmation hearing? Asking for a friend.
-
15 minutes ago, horncyclist said:24 minutes ago, Bateshorn said:It's either that or potentially lose the seat forever. If the Senate flips, and you can't get Trump's nominee seated before the New Congress, it's gone until 2020. Schumer will tell Trump that Merrick Garland is the only nominee the Senate will consider.
As an aside, the politization of the Supreme Court is shameful. Need to do SCOTUS term limits to start to reverse it.
Welcome to 1987.
-
-
13 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:
Grassley is shocked that the senate dems are using information to their advantage, and that they’re using politics to potentially stop a conservative appointment? I guess he was shocked when McConnell previously said that his main job was to stop Obamacare from having legislation passed. Politics in DC, who knew.
-
i see wypepo
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Bullneck said:
I'm dead serious.
She's right. Don't you agree?
Hook 'em, Elizabeth!!!
I think that Liz is a compelling law professor and represents Massachusetts well. But would hardly waste my time patting her on the back.
-
Just now, Bullneck said:
God bless Elizabeth Warren.
-
2
-
1
-
I pledge to post more pictures of this STEAK
in Food and Travel
Posted
avatar checks out.