Jump to content

Anastasis

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    31952
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Anastasis

  1. We’re gonna kick their fucking ass.
  2. Take that tractor supply shit up with triple. He might be actually dead.
  3. Read the aduhelm thread.
  4. It’s not like we didn’t discuss this stuff in real time.
  5. Blame the scientists? lol. Mandate strategy was the fever dream of dipshit lawyers trying to extend executive power in a way that totally ignored the fundamental of epidemiology and infectious disease.
  6. Another of the same. You guys are still struggling to understand how we got to this place and the role that wrongheaded public policy approach from CDC and FDA contributed. People told you in real time on the board the implications and effect in longer term.
  7. It’s funny getting lectures from clowns like wildcat that actively promoted absolutely absurd mandate schemes, despite the clear epidemiology and totally predictable outcomes wrt public health messaging credibility. The real kicker is that they did so knowing that the epidemiology was wrongheaded, but supported it because it was a matter of authority and basis in science was totally not the point and of no consequence.
  8. LOL, you are asking me to preordain my assessment? We already had this exchange. I will read whatever is put out, examine the methods and results, and draw conclusions based on what it shows. As I indicated in our last exchange, if they are shooting for a September read out, I don't think that they will be able to draw any robust conclusions or really even bring to light any new meaningful epidemiology. On that timeframe, it's just gonna be some hack meta-analysis or something similar that won't really move the needle. Certainly nothing that could ro should be used to pull market authorizations. So I'd say that my strong prior here would be extreme skepticism of any strongly stated conclusions if they actually release a full report in September (I still don't think that happens).
  9. We've already had this exchange dipshit. Try not to trip over your rhetoric on the way to get your flu shot.
  10. That's fake news troph. I don't think that the FDA is going to "ban SSRIs". I think that that is pretty ridiculous, but if they indeed moved to do so I would be adamantly opposed. Regarding net positive/negative, from last page..."Clearly the risk benefit equation will almost always favor treatment". Research into the potential link between psychotropic medications and homicide/violence etc. is good, as is broader public health oriented research on the topic. BTW guys, don't forget to sign up for your flu shots. I was just running an errand by the pharmacy and they are dishing 'em out.
  11. Both. More research to further understand the underlying pathophysiology, identify and test new and more effective treatments, optimize the use of the current (quite antiquated frankly) treatment options. And certainly also appropriate treatment by a psychiatrist.
  12. Ana: Real world health outcomes research is good! CR: barf alot.
  13. I know that attention span is hard for some on this board, particularly jimmy, but all these things have been discussed on this board in different political context previously. The really interesting thing is tracking which discussion points have remained uninfluenced by the political environment and which did total 180s. Unfortunately, some of the receipts have been lost, part of the reason posters like Jimmy whig out.
  14. No. That's actually true. I understand it unfathomable to some of y'all.
  15. I hope for only wellness and mental stability for you and yours.
  16. I guess congrats for repeating nonsense uncritically.
  17. Also. LOL. What a clown.
  18. You are totally deranged. There have literally been the same exact topics discussed on this board going back two or three different iterations. We've discussed the vax schedule, we've discussed the use of psychotropics broadly and also in these particular situations. Nothing here is new ground. The political climate certainly has changing though. What is new is the political dysfunction overlay, yes #bothsides. New wrinkles along the way, ivermectin clowns for example. RIP triple.
  19. Also. This is just obvious gaslighting doc.
  20. Also funny how guys always always fall back to silly af ad hominem.
  21. LOL. Nothing in that post is remotely controversial. Imagine being a medical professional pushing back against RW research to inform clinical practice. I understand that your experience with psych, particularly SMI, is probably extremely limited.
  22. Would love to hear what tweaks your are going to incorporate and how this progresses. Reminder this out from the food board post.
  23. It’s a good thing that we are finally remembering this.
  24. I have zero problem with more research on this issue. I think there is probably more to it here than confounding by indication. It’s actually been discussed both here and broadly in other areas as well going back years.
×
×
  • Create New...