Posts posted by jimmyjazz
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Edited by jimmyjazz
2 minutes ago, Lobo said:Even his idiotic voters have to stop and think, "A million new workers seems like a lot, there's not even a million people at our company."
Well, no, they don't. It would be great if they did, but no, they just swallow it, along with everything else they swallow on a daily basis. They're stupid and unAmerican.
-
-
-
2 minutes ago, hayden_horn said:
i'm honestly not one that stands for over-formality, but his refusal to put on a jacket is telling of his character.
As you know, it's an appeal to his base. He's cultivating an image of being hard-working, no frills kind of guy, and as an aside, his wrasslin' muscles are still to big to be constrained.
-
That's nuts. I go
Margherita (essentially a cheese pizza with basil)
Cheese (the gold standard to see what kind of skills the pizza parlor actually has)
Italian sausage, sometimes with jalapenos
Pepperoni, pancetta or prosciutto (more for my kids)
I want a pizza, not a dough-based casserole delivery system.
-
Edited by jimmyjazz
11 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:If one of my client hires me to deliver an embezzlement demand and I do it (I wouldn't, because I'm not Rudy), the client doesn't get to say "hey, HE did it, not me, so I'm innocent." Nope. The law is and always has been clear. If you direct an agent to commit a crime, you are liable for that crime as well. It's how we've convicted every fucking mobster who sent out some muscle to kill a guy.
This leads me to one of the more infuriating aspects of the Republicans' tactics: that somehow, the Democrats' disdain for President Trump has them looking for crimes, and they're only bringing these articles because they want him out.
Let's take that at face value: let's assume that's exactly the case. If the FBI wants to bring down Al Capone, and they take a clever, efficient and relatively bulletproof angle by hitting him with charges of tax evasion, a crime he was guilty of, does that somehow diminish the value of the prosecution? Does the commission of a crime while someone is already under investigation mean that crime can't be prosecuted?
No, of course not. Just say it, Democrats. "Hell yeah, we want him out of office, he is a threat to our Republic. He abused the power of his office and we're bringing the articles of impeachment accordingly."
-
1 minute ago, Iceman said:
I ignored your interpretation of it.
What does that mean? Have you read Sondland's testimony? If you're a good American, you'll pay attention to his two amendments of his testimony after his memory was repeatedly "refreshed"?
Come on, let's discuss this, unless you just want to be thrown in the same trash heap with the other trolls. I'm not trolling you. I want you to explain why Sondland's testimony is irrelevant.
-
-
-
-
-
Well, no. Horowitz' findings are not consistent with other statements about the "essentiality" of the Steele dossier in securing the surveillance warrant on Page, but regardless, that dossier was not promoted as corroborated, and therefore it was already viewed with a jaundiced eye by the FISA court.
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Anastasis said:
I’ve stated my belief that he should have been removed from office after Helsinki, impeached based on volume II of mueller report, and impeached based on Ukraine situation. I have opined on Russian election interference in this thread ad nauseum, and suggested steps to be taken moving forward, both internally facing and externally. Seriously. You guys are putting on a pathetic showing.
Nah. It's mostly just that any serious post you make gets lost in dozens of posts full of nothing but vague, pedantic bullshit. That's on you.
Donald Trump 2019
in Cloak Room
This summarizes it pretty well for me.