-
Posts
45369 -
Joined
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by jimmyjazz
-
-
8 hours ago, Augustus said:
Oh there are plenty of folks who'd love to outlaw all guns.
No, not really. Try another channel.
-
3
-
1
-
-
I've been known to mix a small amount of coffee with Shiner Bock. Tastes pretty good.
-
7 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
Here's my question for Trumpkins: how do you justify this? I mean, I hear y'all hollering about how you think "No, the DEMS colluded with the Russians!" Fine. Let's say they did. Shouldn't we want to stop THAT? Shouldn't we want to secure our elections against purposeful foreign interference, REGARDLESS of which "side" it might favor?
I fully expect a revised version of an election security bill specifically targeting interference which helps Democrats.
-
-
10 hours ago, Anastasis said:
how was he not already on 24/7 suicide watch?
You could probably connect the dots if you thought about it more.
-
46 minutes ago, Zavala said:
Couldn't use "collusion" because it's not a legal term.
Did use "exonerate" and the entire news media ran with it. The nobody in the justice system has the power to exonerate.
Without fail, you'll simply latch on to whatever silly argument Sean and Rush and FOX tell you to run with. It's stunning. Nobody gives a shit if there's no "Department of Exoneration". TRUMP has been the one saying he was exonerated -- not Mueller. And now Trump is floating the opposite because he caught wind of a dumbass congressman trying to make a semantic gotcha while missing the entire fucking point.
No, the Mueller report did not exonerate Trump. It's not just because Mueller lacked the power to exonerate -- it's because the evidence made it impossible to exonerate (as a matter of English language) even if that power existed.
The simplicity of Trumpkins is breathtaking. You will quite literally believe anything you are told, with no fact-checking whatsover.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, Mojo Hand said:
A joint statement is a brilliant idea, if you could get one. Carter and Clinton would be in for sure, but I don't know if you could get W or Obama to come out publicly.
Eh, it would be largely toothless. 3 Dems and a Republican simpleton.
-
I think Bette stands a very good chance of being right about Trump's "blackground". Now, the Tweeden shaming is over the line -- Bette made her career off bawdy song and dance work long before she ascended to superstar status, and I'm pretty sure she'd be offended by some of Franken's behavior, too. (Not that I agree with Franken's resignation, I don't actually, but he did cross a line and "she was dressed like she wanted it" is a piss-poor justification.)
-
3
-
-
So what was your son's punishment for falling short on his SAT? (Holy smokes, that's awesome!)
-
Nice job (6-1) on the road against the bottom of the division . . . one more and then back home.
-
1
-
-
Hey, TTom
told
us
between
pints
of
cheap
whiskey.
Good to have you back, buddy! Don't take any Tylenol.
-
4
-
1
-
2
-
-
What 2 "nauseous and nauseating" networks said "this was a really bad day for the Democrats"? Should be easy to prove.
-
I'm not one to bag on the press too much, but surely somebody asked "then why did you claim total exoneration for so long"?
-
6 minutes ago, Red Five said:
Yeah, isn’t that sort of a crime? I mean, it used to be.
You mean this?
QuoteDEMINGS: "Isn't it fair to say that the President's written answers were not only inadequate and incomplete because he didn't answer many of your questions, but where he did, his answers showed that he wasn't always being truthful?"
MUELLER: "I would say, generally."The "perjury" part? That's a crime?
-
1
-
-
Danielle Reno for POTUS.
-
2 minutes ago, Anastasis said:
He is an old man, and the testimony is long and intellectually intense. It's not a fault, its just reality.
I don't disagree -- my point is that this kind of scrutiny for this long is tiring for anyone of any age.
-
Good job by Schiff to get Mueller to reluctantly weigh in on ethical responsibility.
-
5 minutes ago, Anastasis said:
Mueller getting tired I think.
Ever been on a 7 hour job interview?
-
Just now, hayden_horn said:
it's funny, the D's do it to establish his credibility, and the R's do it to try and take the edge off their questions/attacks on his credibility.
More to the point, both do it to establish their patriotism, whether it exists or not.
-
It would be nice if they just polled the legislators "who here appreciates Mr. Mueller's service?" at the jump and then get on past that silly repetitive praise. We get it. It's not germane.
-
Wait . . . Article 2 Section 2 isn't talking about pardons in the event of POTUS under impeachment, is it? I believe it limits POTUS' ability to pardon other officials who are being impeached. Am I reading it wrong?
-
"666 Fifth Avenue"
I will never fail to LOL at that address.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, Gil Bang said:
That last paragraph sucks. Write better.
-
The sad thing is that the right wing base is so fucking stupid that they're too stupid to see how stupid their elected officials are.
A HS debate team wouldn't make these mistakes.
The Robert Mueller Investigation
in Cloak Room
Posted
I'm not sure that's true.