Jump to content

Hagbard Celine

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19488
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Hagbard Celine

  1. parcells: don't go for 2 unless: 1) you have to; 2) it's late and your touchdown just put you up by 4 or 5 take 3 points unless: 1) there's not enough time to get the ball back, i.e. late in the 4th; AND 2) you are 100% on your line and your call
  2. werd i posted in another thread, early in the game he single-handedly stopped a jort drive making 2 plays in a row, only to have the 3rd down go bust on a flag baller
  3. then why did everyone want to play for saban?
  4. we're on the road opening day retooled everything top 5 opponent at the top of the blueblood list everyone arguing against taking points is doing so emotionally
  5. we may have to split the football board in half forum 1: take the points forum 2: the other forum
  6. is boyd congruent with scipio or do they have 2 different takes?
  7. q: sark's 1st game in '96 against air force, sark sucked, how does he use that experience to help arch, sark: blah blah q: bouwmeister; sark: pin them deep q: calling qb runs; sark: yes q: arch mechanics: sark: get his feet shoulders aligned will help accuracy, he was turning his shoulders to find crossers q: playcalling receivers open arch didn't see them; sark: arch will grow in to seeing route structures unfold, don't judge passing game and arch on chapter 1 q: pleased w/ the start against team like that? comment on run game?; sark: ? last year we were too cute against those teams (which teams?), wanted to have a physical mentality, run straight at them, we did that, challenged offense to block better extend runs, commitment to run the ball, need other elements of the team to show up q: next 3 weeks about us or them; sark: both q: stupid question, twice pinned them inside their 5, what's the balance of going for 2 and leaving DBs on an islarnd: sark: hard count, pocket contain, punt from the endzone is the goal q: no takeaways what did you see on film; sark: they didn't give us opportunities to get picks, cautious pass game, didn't beat themselves, on tackles 2nd guy must attack ball will be emphasizing strips through minute 29 on the stream q: endries; sark:
  8. opening statement: 50 played 7 true freshman only 11% explosives have to be over 20% 24 game streak no turnovers ended and that was a difference 170 ground yards a positive not just flags but timing of the flags - recounts all the bad flags have to be better at playing complementary ball 1/5 on 4th have to do better positives: baxter, muhammad, bouwmeister, 4 new 0-line starters, 2nd-half-arch
  9. tangential to hornshine.... last night: rushing miami 37/127/3.4 domer 27/94/3.5 passing miami 20/31/205/6.6 domer 19/30/221/7.4 yards miami 332 domer 314
  10. @shadow_operative2.0 batphone blinking
  11. so the hot blond is part of the carr family/group... sister? girlfriend?
  12. miami cheer is not worth marking up but their pom is nice.... these are the 'sunsations'
  13. i am guilty of dreaming of wormsign everyone fell for the banana in the tailpipe all of us we all wanted and were willing to believe arch could be 4th and 5 vince in his first start with the keys we all wanted the defense to play with capes and fly through the air at supersonic speed in defiance of gravity jamaal-corn-4th-quarter rushing numbers, in every quarter it was a nice dream time to go to work
  14. parcells takes those 3 points
  15. i know it's a revolutionary concept and we are pushing quantum mechanics to it's limit, but is such a thing even possible?
  16. i posted in another thread.... it took dabo 7.5 seasons to win it all
  17. checking math..... 3 field goals and a touchdown equals..... checking notes again..... recalculating..... recalculating....... 16 points
  18. he made 2 plays in a row to shut down a jort drive only to be negated by a flag
  19. i plaintexted bevoabyss because his data paints and conclusion are compelling unspoken is the measuring stick in this argument in the world where stoops wins it all in year 2 is no more smart made the title game in year 2 but took until year 6 to win a natty dabo took 7.5 seasons to break through saban won his 1st title in his 14th season as a head coach, year 3 at bama tom landry had the albatross of "couldn't win the big one" for 5 years it may take sark 10 years and i'm here for it
  20. Here are the offense and defense points per game since Sark arrived. 2021 offense = 423 points / 35 per game defense = 373 points / 31 per game 2022 offense = 448 points / 35 per game defense = 28 points /22 per game 2023 offense = 501 points / 36 per game defense = 265 points / 19 per game 2024 offense = 528 points / 33 per game defense = 245 points / 15 per game 2021-2024 TOTAL offense = 34 per game defense = 21 per game KEY POINTS -- Sark's offense has averaged 33-36 points per game all 4 years -- Sark's points per game has not improved -- regardless of QB (whether it is Casey, Card, QE, Arch). -- Defense is the MAJOR improvement. 2021-2025 VS Top 12 (record is 3-10 ... 1-7 v Top 5) offense = 24 per game defense = 31 per game -- Sark's offense drops 10 points per game, so he is not the play calling wizard against top teams. -- defense gives up 10 more points per game. -- not a title winning formula. Offense VS Non Top 12 (record is 35-7) 2021 399/12 = 33 2022 365/9 = 41 2023 406/9 = 45 2024 410/12 = 35 -- Sark racks up point on lesser teams. No surprise. CONCLUSION: Sark is the constant on offense across all 4 seasons of 33-35 point averages. Sark has serious trouble beating top teams. Offense scores less, has trouble in red zones, defense gives up more points. This has serious implications in the playoffs, as we have seen past two years. Unless, these patterns are changed, he will not win a national title. That's the bottom line.
  21. if 4th quarter manning was there from the 1st series would you still say that?
  22. sark is going to deploy hands he trusts for returns and i agree with that
×
×
  • Create New...