so this is what was pissing me off earlier because people are conflating a few things that aren't necessarily true and I was rightfully flamed for this because I was arguing a different argument (specifically against Oregon v Texas getting in)
Pac12 winner is in (committee fuckery, but whatever it's a known thing) <-- This is where people are trying to debate, but it makes no sense at all for THIS SPECIFIC COMMITTEE to not put one of these 2 teams in. Leaving FSU out is easier than not putting one of them in.
MICH B1G winner is in with win, which is more of a rubber stamp than anything anyway <-- You lose to the worst offense in the NCAA you don't get to play with the big boys. Won't happen, but needs to be said.
FSU ACC winner is most likely in with win, but it's not certain because they are so dogshit and played a joke of a schedule and don't have their MVP. <-- This cleans up a lot of the debate and only makes FSU big mad, but who cares fuck them.
SEC winner in with GA win, questionable with Alabama win because of H2H with Texas. <-- This is where the real debate lies, do you ignore the H2H and if so, why?
I think the thread has gotten to the debate that matters now instead of "OMFG OREGON AND tOSU AHEAD OF TEXAS LGKNBOLIKHNEQWOPINHLSBHJZ"