Jump to content

Serak The Preparer

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1273
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Serak The Preparer

  1. 3 minutes ago, Pancho said:

    Twitch Quote GIF by Hyper RPG

    Do you think we lose to TCU or ISU? I didn't quite hear your answer over the meme. Sorry to press, just contrasting your non-answer with "None of them will tell me why" post.

  2. 4 minutes ago, Pancho said:

    We can definitely lose @TCU and @ISU if we play like today.

     

    We can technically lose every game on the schedule. Holy shit everyone sorry we are 5-6 to end the season. 

    Call your shot. Do we lose do either of those teams?

  3. 11 minutes ago, Vic Mackey said:
    13 minutes ago, ATXhorn17 said:

    Yup, everyone is already talking about a conference championship re-match. But I still see us dropping 1-2 more in the regular season.

    It's a tale as old as time. Lose the OU game and think running the table is inevitable and just get them back in December. Except it never happens like that

    Texas is better than in previous years and the rest of the Big 12 is worse than previous years. Call your shot or stop being a bitch. Who beats Texas in rest of the regular season?

  4. 17 minutes ago, Valmy77 said:

    Obviously the defense could have saved the day but there was about a 80% chance OU at least gets it in field goal range with that much time left.

    We get that first down, that threat goes away.

    This such a stupid fucking statement. In a universe in which there is a 80% chance that any team in the world gets a fg in 1:30 drive with no timeouts what do you think the typical score is? It's certainly a hell of a lot higher than 34-30.

  5. 31 minutes ago, YGIFS said:

    From Zagreb to Sarajevo, Ljubljana to Lisbon, Manhattan to Mar-a-Lago.  Imagine how much old man, cum-of-mushroom dick soup that rancid cunt had to swallow or wipe off her face over the decades.  And in the end, she'll have almost nothing to show for it but a pile of bankruptcy filings, a list of mistresses demanding hush money, and helping her son weigh offers to play the titular role in the George Muresan biopic.  She should take the honorable way out and smother Trump in his sleep.  She'd be well taken care of in that case and never have to worry about debasing herself ever again.  

    Ooh, do you think they'll recreate the best moment in commercial history?

    Gheorghe Muresan Cologne - YouTube

    "I'm Gheorghe Mureșan, do you want to smell like me?"

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 3
    • Drool 2
  6. 10 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

    Against Bye?  I doubt it.

    Plus, we're like 37 and 2 in playoff series against the American League the last few years.  You'd know that, if you weren't a typical bandwagon-jumping Ranger fan who slept through the last dozen years of MLB.

    Hey can you lay off FartingDreamer? He is highly regarded and this is one of his few outlets. I heard this straight from one his wives.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 4
    • Fuck You 1
  7. 9 hours ago, TwiceHorn said:

    Don't forget the legal system, which wealth creators tend to use a lot more of and depend a lot more on than the average bloke.

    I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader to determine if that omission was intentional or not.

    • Fuck You 1
  8. 9 hours ago, Chewbacca said:


     

     


    I don't have a problem with wealth creation (I've created a bit myself). I have never needed anything from the government. And yet I still believe we should be decent to each other (you know, the whole love your neighbor thing). And I still think you and anyone who thinks Jan 6 was anything other than a coup attempt is a fucking traitor. Have a good night. May your boat spring a leak the next time you go fishing.

     

    That's not true, unless you are saying you never needed education for yourself or those around you, police protection for the wealth you generated, the ability to travel on roads or through air, the ability to breathe clean air and drink clear water, the ability to take safe medication, etc. I am not trying to call you out Chewbacca, as I am pretty sure you would recognize all of this, but it is important to recognize that we all benefit strongly from the government beyond direct monetary assistance.

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 2
  9. 4 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

    I don't know.  Just remember it was that shitbag and his dumb beard taking a pic with another guy who ended somehow being an even bigger shitbag.   And he got eviscerated here for it.  Then again, Cruz so who really gaf. 

    So you don't have a relevant point or relevant example, just wanted to white knight for Ana.

    Good Talk Russ GIFs | Tenor

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 1
  10. 1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

    Like Ted Cruz taking a pic with a guy who ends up being a shitbag.  And then getting ripped on it for this site, as if he knew who some rando wanting a pic was?  That's what you mean by error not lying with the audience, correct?  

    I 100% agree that if a rando gets a picture taken with Ted Cruz and that rando is a shitbag, then it's not on Ted Cruz or his team (assuming that said rando was not specifically invited to event). With the acknowledgement that Cruz gets shit on regularly on this forum, are there particular events you are thinking of or are you creating false events to create outrage over in an effort to equivicate Ana's statement about applauding Nazis?

  11. 2 minutes ago, fattyflattie said:

    Well posters bring evidence of it here (like Ana did) and people crack on it and as your put it, don't put a huge amount of critical thinking into it.  But then again, it's the other way around, so you know... 

    None of them actual Nazis though.  So.  Not very pretty. 

    You dolt, what is it you think Ana brought evidence of? That people applaud when prompted to? Holy shit, you solved the laugh track riddle!

    Clearly the Canadian org that brought this dude in should have done some research and has significant fault but the error doesn't lie with the audience. Saying they were applauding a Nazi as if there was any knowledge of his past is incredibly disingenuous.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  12. 1 minute ago, fattyflattie said:

    Politicians get heat for taking pics with people who end up being shitbags all the time. I've seen it on this site.  But no one was excusing it then. Weird. 

    If those politicians posted on this board this would be a super relevant comment.

  13. 4 hours ago, Anastasis said:

    Said in serious fashion by the guys that give standing ovations to nazis because they have pretty basic lack of awareness of history and context. 

    I've been drinking while watching cfb and interesting mlb games the last few hours but really @Anastasis? Your entry in this conversation was to accused audience members who were told to applaud for someone they had no particular reason to cause a scene over, that they were cheering for nazis as if giving overt approval of nazis? If I shake hands with someone at my church/social club/job, am I appoving their life history? I agree with many if your claims that critical thinking is sorely lacking in many facets of life but you laid a giant turd in the punch bowl here and then were affronted when called our by it.

    • Hook 'Em 4
  14. 22 minutes ago, Gil Bang said:

    Gavin needs to say some kind words and immediately appoint her successor.   We don't have time to fuck around.; 

    If Gavin has not had her replacement selected for the last several months then he is incredibly incompetent, and for all of his faults, I don't think that is one. Maybe replacement isn't announced today out of respect but I would be really surprised if not announced by Monday. This event isn't exactly a shocker.

    • Hook 'Em 3
  15. 2 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    Simple, tell one of the defenders to contact an offensive player. Dead ball, half the distance, you have time to run on the 11th defender.

    How? Can anyone on the field hear that if a coach yells? I legit don't know if that's realistic.

    You could tell the player running on to do that but I don't think you'd have time before the free play.

    I guess maybe if a coach runs out on the field, is that a sideline infraction without a free play?

  16. 10 hours ago, AbeFroman said:

    That you would defend that fuck up and make excuses is asinine.  I will give him the slightest leeway in that interview since it was after the game, so maybe his head was still spinning a little, but if he comes out this week and continues to defend that and make a case why it was better to go with 10 rather than be penalized, move it up 6 inches and reset, then everything in his life needs to be questioned.

    It is beyond ridiculous to think it was better to go without a lineman on the goalline rather than resetting.  

    How exactly do you think they should have reset? They had no timeouts and were backed up in the end zone. Is there a way to get another lineman out there without an obvious offside as he tries to run across the field, thus giving Ohio State a free play and even more chances to win?

    Obviously there was a massive fuckup in only have 10 guys out there but would love to hear what you think Freeman should have done once that was noticed.

  17. 6 hours ago, slorch said:

    subs don't enter the field from the endzone.

    It would have been offsides, not illegal participation/ too many men on the field.  That penalty would have been half the distance to the goalline, however.  Tee-hee.

     

    Not just half-the-distance though, it would have been a free play against those same 10 guys on the field. Then, if that free play doesn't work out for Ohio State, they get to try again. I actually think that Freeman was right not to try to push an 11th guy out there.

    • Hook 'Em 1
×
×
  • Create New...