Jump to content

Hookah Horns

Full Members
  • Posts

    2505
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hookah Horns

  1. I don't follow your argument that they're not fake Christians. These people would call Jesus a woke snowflake cuck pussy to his face. You seem to be saying that the original breed of Christianity in America was also hypocritical and fake. I can get down with that. But I disagree that they want to rule under the Bible. They want to rule under Bible verses cherry picked mostly from the Old Testament.
  2. I'm sure that there will be moral outrage about "porno Joe" mentioning sex. Children listen to the president!
  3. Think of a nazi that pretended to be religious and you're pretty much there.
  4. Obama laughably high. They must be giving him credit for the things he wanted to do but failed due to R obstruction shenanigans. And then there's the foreign policy things others have mentioned.
  5. This really makes me want to take a shovel to the faces of my conservative relatives and friends. I get that feeling often these days.
  6. I'd have gone with Glory but that's not bad.
  7. Holy shit, you need to get your brain totally rewired. I can only imagine what other insane opinions you have formed that are entirely counter to all available evidence. I'm assuming you're a flat earther and 9/11 truther. Much harsher reactions like...what? Mean Truths? JK, Trump doesn't even have the stones to do that. Few people in history have been as shameless about being in another man's pocket. I'd put Biden's senility and confusion up against Trump's any day of the week. Nothing Biden has said has even been in the same universe as Trump confusing Haley with Pelosi, as just one example. And on top of that you have Trump's abject ignorance regarding on most any topic aside from defrauding people and orchestrating clownshows. And describing Trump as unpredictable is probably the biggest knee slapper of all.
  8. Sidebar: New York gets an F for how they've named and organized their court system. I'm convinced they had the intention of confusing non-residents. It appears they have no idea what "supreme" means, and having an intermediate "appellate division" a level below the "court of appeals" is regarded.
  9. After the NY courts are done I'm certain that the Trump legal braintrust will conjure up some specious constitutional issue that they'll shit out onto SCOTUS' doorstep to try to at least get a stay.
  10. Yeah I get that, but the Rs sure do love wheeling out their handful of token "ethnic" members to show how diverse and inclusive they are. They may accurately reason that the base, while racist as fuck, are so loyal to Cheeto that they won't lose a single vote if they go with a black VP. I think they'd perceive the inroads with blacks would more than make it worth it. Though they'd definitely be scared shitless about being responsible for a second black president if Dotard dies in office.
  11. It was pretty apparent to me that he just didn't care to get into his real feelings on the people horseface mentioned so he was like yeah, sure, they're all on the list, whatever. No reason to cause a fuss about it until he announces who it'll be.
  12. The smart move would probably be Tim Scott or Byron Donalds. I wouldn't be totally shocked if his advisers convince him to go that route, but with Cheeto the smart money is always on the stupidest move possible. That's why I'm sticking with my prediction of MTG for Veep.
  13. Not sure how you apparently took me to mean that Biden or the prospect of his reelection sucks balls. I'm saying that - between his inexplicably poor approval ratings, widespread concern about his age with calls for him to step aside, and the existential threat posed by Cult 45 - the circumstances of this election sucks balls.
  14. I think most people are concerned less about Biden's numerical age or even his gaffes than the way he looks and sounds. It's very concerning to me when considering how the average dumbass in this country views the potus election horse race. Of course Dotard is almost as old and says even more senile shit, but it's hard to deny that he comes across as more vigorous right now. It's OK to acknowledge that this situation sucks balls. Refusing to talk about it isn't going to make the issue go away. Neither Stewart nor any other serious commentator on the age issue is saying that it makes Dotard the superior choice.
  15. I'd love to sit in on the Fox News staff's brainstorming sessions re: how to obfuscate basic shit to confuse their stupid ass viewers. I have no doubt they laugh their asses off when coming up with stuff like this. "How bout we act like he's being charged just for 'talking to Russians'? Then we can make the Biden admin look corrupt and also help whitewash all the Trump/Russia shit. It's not like they're gonna read or hear about it anywhere else 😂"
  16. Everyone misses the '90s.
  17. I can't conceive of anything slimier than prosecuting war criminals at The Hague.
  18. Nothing other than Dotard. Beneficiaries are entitled to get the funds directly from GFM if it's not paid to them by the organizer.
  19. GoFundMe up to $750k. There is no limit to MAGAt stupidity.
  20. You know what grinds my gears? Trial judges taking their sweet ass time making a straight-forward ruling like this one should be. Did you mean to ask how it would disadvantage his defense? If so, that's impossible to answer, because it obviously didn't/doesn't at all. The theory is that the relationship was a/the motivation for pursuing the case and/or creates an improper incentive to try the case no matter what. At least that's the idea behind the disqualification statute - prosecutors are supposed to only care about obtaining justice. It's dumb as fuck for multiple reasons. First, a grand jury indicted defendants. Second, this case was always certain to go to trial. Third, everyone knows Trump is guilty. Fourth, Wade was already making good money from his practice; it's not as though she gave her unemployed bf a job. Fifth, they're no longer seeing each other. The judge seems most concerned about the "appearance of impropriety" tainting the public's perception of the case. Couple of problems with that. First, the applicable law seems to require an actual conflict, not just the appearance of one. Second, everyone who might question the legitimacy of the case based on these facts has believed it was a sham from the getgo. This whole issue's been a big, pointless waste of time.
  21. This one's easy. 1. They were indicted by a grand jury and a lot of the felonious conduct forming the basis of the case was done out in the open. Any argument that this is a farce is farcical. 2. Even if she appointed Wade to get a dickback, how does that prejudice the defendants in any way?
  22. This woman was a judge.
  23. I meant that he'd die in office and never be tried.
×
×
  • Create New...