Captainant
-
Posts
13710 -
Joined
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Captainant
-
-
Just now, Chrispy said:
No, it says “fair terms” and I’m curious what that means. You’re being unnecessarily argumentative.
No, you're being intentionally obtuse in saying " that wasn’t her only consideration", making it sound like she's being unreasonable, when she's receiving death threats and getting doxxed and all of conservative media is painting her as some political zealot. It's not like people's homes have been burned down when credibly accusing prominent GOP politicians or anything right?
I'm not being argumentative, it's that I'm not giving you the benefit of the doubt when you consistently make misleading statements about a woman who faced sexual assault.
-
1 minute ago, Chrispy said:
You need to read her attorney’s statement again, that wasn’t her only consideration.
What' that the hearing be fair and safe, and not be arbitrarily on Monday? That's really the only requests that I see from the email. If that's unreasonable to you, then wow.
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
As I've said before, it would have really helped if Kavanaugh was more credible than what was put on display during the confirmation hearings.
yeah, his lies and intentionally misleading answers under oath are really becoming an issue now that it's a s/he said
-
Just now, Stros said:
She is a hero to the left. She will get a high paying job win or lose from the left. She will be a rockstar to the left if it crushes Kavanaugh.She is already a career scientist and academic and is squarely NOT in politics. The fact that you think she's doing this as a career play is a testament to just how caustically cynical you are about this and how blinded you are by your biases.
-
1 minute ago, realgreggym said:
Wet dream was probably a poor choice of words.. I agree. The problem is that I don't know the facts and I am not sure anyone else does. . The other concern is the questionable timing, the fact that she claims to want to stay anonymous and yet took a polygraph and then hired a far left wing anti Trump attorney that has connections to Soros. And yet this intelligent woman thought that she could stay anonymous. I believe until proven otherwise that this is just another setup just like Thomas because dems lost elections and this is their only option left.
If it can be proven otherwise, I'll listen... a little.
So all of what you've said is EXACTLY why the Federal Bureau of Investigation should probably take a look at these allegations. It's a FELONY to lie to the FBI, just ask the majority of trump's senior campaign staff, so why would she be lying and begging for a felony? Why is it out of the question for the FBI to investigate this?
-
3 minutes ago, Chrispy said:
I can’t wait to hear these conditions.
yeah, can't imagine why a woman who's literally receiving death threats and who's been doxxed by crazy people may want some special consideration for her safety.
-
16 minutes ago, GRHorn said:
He lumped the criminal justice and law enforcement systems together and collectively called them “the new Jim Crow”.
The headline is oversimplified and meant to be sensational, but the meaning was there.
I have to admit I thought he’d be a slicker speaker. When asked about the anthem and kneeling, “No it’s not disrespectful”. Really? Of course it is. That’s the point. That’s what draws attention to it. That’s what makes it a good protest.
That clip sounds bad on Tv.
That clip sounds bad on TV if you're watching the fox news edit of beto instead of the footage from events. You're cherry picking sections from overall statements that put him in the worst light possible and listening only to your biases. "The headline was oversimplified but the meaning was there"? Fucking cmon, that's just lazy.
-
10 minutes ago, Amobie said:
So it looks like that facebook post has been taken down after people started pointing out that it contradicted Ford's account in several areas. Most notably that Ford claims the incident happened during the Summer and that facebook post recalled that it was the "talk of the school" for weeks after it happened.
I mean since we're all speculating wildly in here, it's not unreasonable for something to happen in the summer and have people talking about it for weeks into the school year.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, AtticusFinch said:
You mean privileged material while he was an attorney? They had good reason to
it's not privileged material if he was working for the US government. There's a difference between personal counsel and office counsel.
-
doublepost
-
1 hour ago, Chrispy said:
I talked to him yesterday, he was banned twice.
He was banned for posting
"Go stick up a dick up your ass faggot"
and
"Im sure your parents are real proud of you ending the family lineage by deciding to play with other guys dicks for fun. What an accomplishment. Enjoy being a genetic dead end while you bite pillows for all the guys plowing you."
Go figure, right?
-
2 hours ago, immamac said:
P.S. Sorry about the audio quality we dont have a mic boom yet
Hooray! Those thuds and finger drums on someone's desk were rough lol. Also, may want to do a compression/normalization pass on each person's audio - Bob went from quiet to fucking loud in a couple of places. Great podcast otherwise, loving how absurdly niche it is lol
-
2 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
He's really nailing the "Tucker Carlson" face in that pic lmao
-
1 hour ago, Fudge Nuggets said:
Once again, fear and hate are going to be the way to win an election in Texas. Nice job, morons.
"Real power is fear"
-
7 minutes ago, Iconoclast Texan said:
How confirmation process resembles a trial.
1. Testimony from witnesses under oath
2. “Evidence” submitted to the committee
3. Purpose - Making a decision on the qualification of the nominee based on the 1st 2 items.
Need I say more?
could you point out at which point the "defendant" in your analogy is facing deprivation of rights and liberties as a result of the confirmation process? Oh, he isn't? Guess it isn't a fucking trial then.
-
Just now, Chrispy said:
I really have no clue.
You can fucking say that again
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Chrispy said:
I agree with some of what you’re saying, but it’s a serious charge and requires serious evidence. You’re supposed to prove guilt, not the other way around.
This. is. not. a. criminal. proceeding. You are applying a standard that is completely irrelevant to a confirmation hearing. He isn't being threatened with a loss of liberty or freedoms.
-
2 hours ago, Chrispy said:
It’s possibe, but I’m going to need more to tarnish a man’s reputation and career.
How about multiple counts of perjury?
-
The 8mofo dropping in to thank him at the end is a nice touch. Really sells the whole illusion that there's someone other than his socks posting on there
-
VMW is making the case for a banning in the kavanaugh cr thread. Making hate-speech-esque statements like "Go stick up a dick up your ass faggot"
and
"Im sure your parents are real proud of you ending the family lineage by deciding to play with other guys dicks for fun. What an accomplishment. Enjoy being a genetic dead end while you bite pillows for all the guys plowing you."
Now I know the light touch on moderation is part of what makes surly so surly, but I feel like this is crossing a bit of a line...
- 2
-
Why don't you link it for me.
-
5 minutes ago, Vince_McCoy_Williams said:
Daddy playing judge helps, white privilege at it's finest.
Also, not sure where you're getting the narrative that Beto was in a hit and run, but he got the DWI dismissed through completing a "DWI School" program which isn't some secret handshake sort of deal to get. Just don't have a lawyer that's shit.
-
1 minute ago, Vince_McCoy_Williams said:
Daddy playing judge helps, white privilege at it's finest.
You are spreading lies saying that he has been convicted of crimes. That is demonsterably false. Fuck off to the beto v cruz thread you sycophant navel gazer
-
55 minutes ago, Vince_McCoy_Williams said:
Beto is CONVICTED and Kavanaugh is ACCUSED. Big fucking difference.
Beto wasn't convicted of shit. The "burglary" - aka misdemeanor trespassing - was declined to be prosecuted. The DWI was dismissed. Look it up yourself my dude
- 1
Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation Thread
in Cloak Room
Posted
Just to let you know, I'm negging you not because I disagree with your statement (which I do, btw), but because you're making such a lazy fucking argument and dismissing everything I said.