Jump to content

Brisketexan

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    43312
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    238

Posts posted by Brisketexan

  1. 4 minutes ago, Pods said:

    Yup, I posted it up on the top of this page. She has also been complaining that her email was hacked, so I'd expect we'll start seeing documentation relatively soon. 

    If her emails were hacked, and leaked, I presume that our esteemed POTUS will be most excited about it, because...

    C15G0OgXUAEFS_O.jpg

  2. Just now, Chrispy said:

    This is good news Brisket, enjoy it. Once the terms are finalized, then let the tirades commence. 

    I agree.

    But I also like to play chess.  I have a habit of looking several moves ahead.  I don't like the way this board looks.  

    But maybe I'm wrong.  I'd sure like to be wrong on this one.

    • Like 2
  3. 25 minutes ago, GhostRider said:

    So what you're saying is...  If  you want to become a psycho serial killer, start with your family first.

     

    17 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

    giphy.gif

    I'm not saying that....but y'all seem to be smart fellas.....

  4. 5 minutes ago, High Plains Drifter said:

    My alternate hypothesis might actually qualify as a theory (note that the two terms are not synonymous):

    1) It is supported by massive amounts of evidence (see every post the POS has ever posted).

    2) It is the simplest explanation that fits the data.

    3) It is widely accepted to be the correct and true explanation of the data.

     

     

    So, he's Occam's Asshole?

  5. 30 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    No, you wouldn't.  Not today.  For the same reason that nobody's doing it today -- social and legal pressure has caught up with the phenomenon, and it is no longer socially or legally acceptable.

    But dial back our social and legal standards to what they were in 1920....and yes, you are EXACTLY the kind of person who would do such a thing.  Look at the folks in those pictures.  A lot of them are "fine, upstanding folks."  Good working men, many wearing nice Sunday clothes.  The grocer, the pharmacist, the farmer, the car salesman.  Smiling for the camera.  These aren't toothless yahoos from back in the holler (well, some of them are).  They're folks just like you.

    If you're NOT exactly the kind of person who would do that back in the day....who is?  You are cold, you are cruel, you are vindictive.  You demonstrate no redeemable human qualities on this board.  You are EXACTLY the kind of sick SOB who would inflict cruelty on his fellow man...if only society would get over itself and let him.

    Maybe, just maybe, you're self-aware enough to look in the mirror and loathe what you see.  But I doubt it.

    BTW -- I kinda love getting negged for stuff like this.  Drives the point home, don't it?

    Yep, NOBODY would have been a lyncher.  Nope, nobody.  In fact, nobody WAS a lyncher back in the day.  All lies and fake news.

    Own not just who you are, but EXACTLY who you would have been back in the day.  Own it.

    • Like 1
  6. 2 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:

    During an interview to be broadcast Friday by NBC News, she acknowledged that she was not merely a private lawyer but a source of information for a top Kremlin official, Yuri Y. Chaika, the prosecutor general.

    “I am a lawyer, and I am an informant,” she said. “Since 2013, I have been actively communicating with the office of the Russian prosecutor general.”

    Yet previously she stated; “I operate independently of any governmental bodies,” she wrote in a November statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Wait.

    She said she operated independently of any governmental bodies.

    But now she says she was an informant for the Russian prosecutor general?

    Does this mean that....the Russian lawyer....who team Trump met with....was..............................................lying?

    giphy.gif

  7. 9 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

    Dana needs to ratchet back a couple of shades on her Clairol/Loreal.  Color 666, Wicked Witch of Southlake, isn't doing her any favors.

    Disagree.

    I loathe her.

    But the hair color DEFINITELY works.

     

    Oh, and she's an attention horse for sure:

    Quote
    Paul Guyot, whose production credits include NCIS: New Orleans, The Librarians,and Leverage and who wrote for Felicity and Judging Amy, says Loesch once pitched him a sitcom idea starring herself. As Guyot remembered in a tweet (see it below), the pitch involved “ ‘A hot young mom who does far right radio show.’ Said her age & looks would make 1 side hate her & 1 love her so everyone would watch. Was obsessed w the potential fame & money. I turned her down.”

     

  8. 3 minutes ago, NorthLoop said:

    If you've committed a crime that you could get busted on by DNA, and you uploaded your DNA to a place like that, you're too stupid to remove it anyways. 

    Agreed.

    But here's where it gets risky.  I'm a smart serial killer.  I have no record, my DNA isn't on file anywhere.  Even if I accidentally leave some at a scene, there's no sample out there to match it against (and I'm otherwise squeaky clean and not a suspect, so no need to take a sample from me).

    But my stupid sister in Boise is obsessed with tracing her genetic line back to Cleopatra or some shit, so she uploads HER DNA profile to one of these sites.....and they run the one drop of blood I left at the scene that one time....against the profiles on that website....and it turns out that I show up as a "relative" of my stupid sister.  They ID her, and they start looking at family.  It's only so long before they get to me, and realize that I lived in Sacramento when all the murders took place.

    Not that I (brisketexan) have a problem with this shaking out that way.  It's just that with genetic markers, you don't have to be stupid -- someone related to you (and not a psycho killer) can innocently provide a sample that can lead to your downfall.  Tough shit, psycho killer dude.

  9. 20 minutes ago, Lobo said:

    Between Cosby, Lauer, and Brokaw...I'm starting to realize NBC in the 80's was all lies! 

    So long as they leave George Wendt alone, I think I can recover.  

    He was cheating on Vera.

    With Cliff.

    Who he roofied.

     

    Sorry to break your heart.

    • Like 1
  10. 8 minutes ago, Shenanigans said:

    Looks like they found the match using GEDmatch.com, which is an open source geneology site and not a private one like Ancestry or 23andme.

    This is the notice on their website:

    otmy96e9thu01.jpg

    And...if I was the FBI, I would be doing a MASSIVE data dump of all DNA profiles currently on the site....and then comparing it to the list a month from now, and see who pulled theirs down and has something to hide....

    • Fuck You 1
  11. 13 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

    Define peace?  There has been no actual war there in a long ass time. They arent going to unify. This is the first step toward permanent acceptance of the NK regime by SK and the west. In reality, it probably needed to be done anyway, but this is an NK win for sure. 

     

    12 minutes ago, David Dennison said:

    This is all about de-United Statesing the peninsula, IMO.

    That is a win for China.

    These.

    The entire reason these meetings are happening is because the DPRK finally feels secure enough to meet with outside powers on something of an equal footing.  And the reason they feel that way is because they have functioning and deliverable nukes.  A cornered dog thinks only of how to bite you.  Once he's out of the corner, you can live in peace.  But that dog is not going back to its corner, ever.  And it ain't giving up its teeth.

    My prediction:

    - official state of war ends.

    - DPRK is acknowledged as a nation by South Korea and perhaps others.

    - DPRK keeps its nukes.

    - DPRK uses its new status as "not your enemy" to push and push for the US to leave the Korean peninsula.

    - eventually, they succeed.

    - The winner?  CHINA.

     

    And, in fairness to Trump, based on the DPRK's dedication to developing its nuclear program that preceded him, and continued under him, this was going to be the outcome all along.  He couldn't have stopped it -- not without total war.

  12. 16 hours ago, futureman said:

    yes, of course, I’d lynch people and take photos of it.  you have figured me out.  

    you're a lunatic. 

    No, you wouldn't.  Not today.  For the same reason that nobody's doing it today -- social and legal pressure has caught up with the phenomenon, and it is no longer socially or legally acceptable.

    But dial back our social and legal standards to what they were in 1920....and yes, you are EXACTLY the kind of person who would do such a thing.  Look at the folks in those pictures.  A lot of them are "fine, upstanding folks."  Good working men, many wearing nice Sunday clothes.  The grocer, the pharmacist, the farmer, the car salesman.  Smiling for the camera.  These aren't toothless yahoos from back in the holler (well, some of them are).  They're folks just like you.

    If you're NOT exactly the kind of person who would do that back in the day....who is?  You are cold, you are cruel, you are vindictive.  You demonstrate no redeemable human qualities on this board.  You are EXACTLY the kind of sick SOB who would inflict cruelty on his fellow man...if only society would get over itself and let him.

    Maybe, just maybe, you're self-aware enough to look in the mirror and loathe what you see.  But I doubt it.

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 1
  13. 11 minutes ago, longhornmatt said:

    The amount of projection really is amazing.  It’s basically a bunch of men turning into the stereotypical dumb, insecure woman with low self esteem who is drawn to ridiculous assholes because she mistakes being an asshole with being a confident, worthy man.

    And then, ironically, many of them celebrate the whole red pill “you gotta treat em like shit to be alpha!” bitter man self help subculture without realizing that Trump is following it step by step to make them his bitches.

    Perfectly stated.

  14. 36 minutes ago, wood said:

    I just automatically move up as far as I can and also move over to the left side of the right lane, so I leave as much room as possible.

    Fuck the assholes who just sit there blocking the turn when they have room up ahead and can easily see you sitting there waiting to turn.

    But they can't see you.  Because they are not aware that anyone else on the planet exists, outside of themselves, and whatever is 10 feet directly in front of their car.

    Since I arrived in this town 30 years ago, I have remained amazed that the most oblivious drivers on planet earth all live right here in River City.  It's not that they try to screw you over, it's that it genuinely doesn't even occur to them that someone else might even exist.

    • Like 1
  15. 4 hours ago, Kyrie Eleison said:

    exactly...Trump and the gang, with a few notable exceptions, are nothing but effeminate egomaniacs with inferiority complexes, wholly lacking in any quality that makes a man a man.  it's fucking fascinating to watch.

     

    It's the effeminate, utterly NON-manly part of the deal that blows me away.  This is the SAME fringe that freely uses "cuck" as a political term....yet it's populated by men who drop to their knees and fellate Trump with zero dignity or pride.  They treat him as the ultimate alpha male, what we should all aspire to....and then utterly submit to him, to a degree so embarrassing and humiliating that if we the audience had any decency, we would avert our gaze.

    Again, for the zillionth time....from this crowd, every accusation is a confession.

  16. 2 hours ago, HOOK'EMHOOAH said:

    No two finger prints, irises, tongues, or footprints (on the skin, like a baby's footprint) are the same,

    Got it.  All biometric info is unique.

    So, for us dudes....better get used to the idea of having your mushroom stamp recorded.  Sure, it's gonna make withdrawing money at the ATM awkward, but them's the breaks.

×
×
  • Create New...