Jump to content

TXpride

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    511
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TXpride

  1. So how did we get Terry? I'm genuinely curious. Do they make exceptions if they think someone is a can't miss prospect?
  2. Not really relevant to '26 recruiting. He'll be a junior when they get to campus.
  3. The green waters of Corpus yesterday afternoon:
  4. Are you assuming Charles/Sharma/Terry (and 4+ DTs from this class) won't be ready to step up in 2027? If that's the case, the portal would be the solution, not another HS recruit. And we just signed 5 from the portal. Doubtful they all hit, but the same can be said for HSers. Again, I'm not against it if they all want in. I just have a hard time seeing it.
  5. We would be better off hitting the portal for an immediate contributor if Watson and/or January leave early.
  6. I have seen it. Assuming no attrition, we only lose Brevard and Hunter after next season, leaving 8 plus however many we sign this class. 5 would be a luxury, not a necessity. I don't disagree.
  7. I have a hard time seeing 5 DTs sticking. We might take them all if they want in, but we don't "need" 5 after backfilling through the portal.
  8. Have to think one of our current DT commits will either look around or be encouraged to do so if we land 2 more. Not a bad problem to have I guess.
  9. In all seriousness, he looks much more like a TE than Kent.
  10. Either Sark is actually 5'7 or Berrymon is taller than 6'1.5.
  11. What exactly is stopping Texas from playing the bag game? We've established that paying players isn't morally wrong (quite the opposite, actually). Is it out of respect for the virtuous and ethical NCAA?
  12. Boyd has always been a headcase.
  13. Neither of those teams are close to NC caliber. This was the easiest path they'll ever have.
  14. James Franklin just lost to the first legit team he faced in the playoffs? I'm stunned.
  15. "Blue blood" is a subjective term fucktard, not a fact of history. It's based entirely on perception at a given time. We won our first title in 1963. Nebraska won their first in 1970. Minnesota had 7. To think your 2025 opinion will mean jack shit in 2075, when hardly anyone alive remembers Nebraska wining a title, is laughable hubris.
  16. Hey dipshit, you said "Teams dont become blue bloods and teams don’t lose the designation. The eight blue bloods are now and forever." You think your dumbass opinion of blue blood "designation" in 2025 will mean jack shit 50 years from now? 100 years from now?
  17. I'm sure Minnesota fans thought the same thing in the 1940s.
  18. I don't know that it would've been irrecoverable (hence "I honestly don't know..."), but I think there's a chance it could've been. All the positive momentum around the program would've done a 180.
  19. Are you saying it wouldn't have been a disaster?
  20. Choking the ASU game away would've been an absolute disaster. I honestly don't know if Sark would've been able to recover from it.
  21. If Nebraska is still a "blue blood" the term is meaningless.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...