WR- I think this one is on Sark. He is force feeding an inconsistent athlete. Wingo has 75 targets and 40 receptions for 655 yards.
Banks has 2 TE drafted. I am not a fan of his ability to teach blocking. This is another one where I am wondering why Washington is playing over Townsend. Washington has a couple bad drops this year and is not a good blocker. Townsend is physical. Still not a great traditional blocker, better on the move, but he will try to take some's head off.
If you throw the mess in at LG this season, I think it is fair to say the offensive staff is having issues identifying the talent on the roster.
LB: TyAnthony Smith looks like he will be a stud. LeFau's steady decline in play this year is head scratching. There is talent here. Not sure anything needs to done here. Perhaps just a steady veteran to help bridge the gap to play alongside of Smith next year.
This is just my opinion, but I do not think Sark's offense is inherently finesse. He can get pass happy, but he has always wanted to be an inside zone running team. IT or OT mentioned that the staff likes to keep the run schemes open until Fall camp and whittle them down over camp. Sounds logical, but I would love a more measured approach. Most OL in college are suited to type of scheme. Not a lot of them can drive a guy off the LOS in gap scheme and reach a guy on OZ the next play. The ones that can are 1st 3 round type of guys. You want to run IZ recruit to it and drill it. Why is Texas recruiting "big humans" and running OZ, which relies on athletic OL? I will say Sark is very imaginative with the pass game. You do not see that creativity in the run game. Some people thought Neal Brown would help in that area, but it does not feel like Sark is particularly open to suggestions like PK.