Jump to content

The Original Greaser Bob

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    3136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Original Greaser Bob

  1. Don't know anything about him but on board with him hopefully using "Wes Is Moore".
  2. I guess he would have taken it if the Tico had taken his eyes out, instead of just almost breaking his leg.
  3. How the fuck do most of these guys get by for a week without having the nose broken? Kind of serious question.
  4. Ah, Oscar v. Peterson at the Polo Grounds. My great grandfather was there.
  5. Well, there it is.
  6. You've said some of the most inane shit on the underlying issue in the last couple of days, but yeah, there shouldn't be any bar to anyone being critical of any side of this issue.
  7. Yep. I've gone from really thinking it's about policy to thinking that it's just about people that might have a smidgen of ethics. Policy is a distant tiebreaker from just supporting the candidate who inevitably is going to be less disgusting that the GOP offering. If they are running against an (R) and they are a decent person, I don't care if they are socialists, sportos, motorheads, geeks, sluts, bloods, wastoids, dweebies or dickheads.
  8. And all the Handy Andy cokes you were drinking. Best can design ever.
  9. The irony is that this was in every MAGAs head the last two decades. With worse grammar.
  10. Saw it at Colonies North in San Antonio.
  11. Full circle implies were coming back to something the same. We're coming full fatal free dive.
  12. The question is whether you would have ignored the threat. Would you have? I think he is. He's assassinating their leaders and destroying their defenses. I think they are move likely to deescalate their hostilities now than they a few months ago. But it was always inevitable as long as Iran continued to be and support Israel's enemies.
  13. I posted a link and indicated up front that it was one sided and explained how it contained some info that was helpful to an understanding of the Israeli mindset, being that it was an interview of an Israeli journalist. When I post a link to any podcast I'm not expecting everyone to link to it. But I am expecting the knee-jerkers to respond as you did. Not a surprise given the at least two absolutely laughably factually false statements you have made on this thread.
  14. Strong, openminded responses. He was interviewing a guy. Who is the one who delivered the relevant information. Propaganda: anything that fucks with your world view.
  15. Sam Harris | #422 - Zionism & Jihadism Sure, Sam hates Islam, and the podcast is completely one-sided,but I thought it brought 3 points home strongly. 1) the caged animal mindset of the Israelis. 2) the cynicism about Bibi Net. 3) the hard fact that no one really gives a rat's ass about the Palestinians.
  16. That's what my link said.
  17. Sure. And our strategy to defeat Japan did not equate to a commitment to nuke Japan, despite how rhetoric is generally presented. Same with the Russian nukes on Cuba. There was no commitment when N. Kruschevchev said "we will bury you.". Despite how that rhetoric was gnerally presented. I don't think one can ever say that a developed nuke will or won't be used. I do think that Israel's justification for fearing nuclear weapons, given the history of the 20th and 21st century, is way more rational than your sanguinity.
  18. They originally supported them as a countermeasure to the PLO, which provided to be a mistake, but was probably understandable in Hamas' infancy. I don't think anyone, especially not the Israelis, would put it past Net to do what you suggest or extend the way to retain power. For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it's blown up in our faces | The Times of Israel
  19. I never argued Ahmadinejad is the sole author of threats to destroy Israel and I provided you with some additional quotes from folks other than Ahmadinejad. If your argument is that Iran hasn't pursued a strategy of destroying Israel in the last few decades, I think the evidence belies that. And I do realize that some of the folks quoted later said "not really/JK". Given Iran's part in 10/7, I'm not putting much stock in that.
  20. I'm not. I'm ready for Trump to claim total success and then to fuck right off.
  21. Absolutely ridiculous statement. Hamas caused 10/7 and Iran is the leading supporter of Hamas in terms of funds and weapons. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) worked with Hamas to plan its 7 October 2023 surprise attack on southern Israel and gave the green light for Hamas to launch the assault on a meeting in Beirut on 2 October. In the Hamas-led attack, Palestinian militants killed 1,200 Israelis, primarily civilians, and took around 200 Israeli civilians and soldiers hostage.[24] In the weeks leading up to the attack, some 500 fighters from Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad received training in Iran, under the guidance of the IRGC Quds Force.[25] According to The Washington Post, the attack occurred "with key support from [Iran] who provided military training and logistical help as well as tens of millions of dollars for weapons."[5] According to The New York Times, Internal documents indicate that Hamas sought to persuade Iran and Hezbollah to participate in its attacks.[26][27] The group deferred the assault from an initial 2022 plan, aiming to secure regional backing. Although Iran and Hezbollah offered support, they were unprepared for direct involvement, prompting Hamas to proceed independently.[26][27] So second down the list. If you are lowballing Iranian involvement.
  22. Well, at least some good can come out of this -- clearing up Ahmadinejad's good name.
×
×
  • Create New...