Jump to content

52-80

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    16,454
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 52-80

  1. 3 hours ago, BrickHorn said:

    For Christ’s sake, @Willfully Horn, read the letter. There was no threat, veiled or otherwise. The letter laid out basic “demands” of a protest movement and suggested “further dialogue.”

    Let he who hasnt approached someones house at 4am in a ski mask to ask for further debate at 5am cast the first stone

    Totally normal shit to defend. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 2
  2. 22 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

    It wasn't (nor was the regent claiming) a home invasion.  It wasn't really trespassing either.  It was a thinly veiled threat as stated that we know where you live.  This is the scene in the movie when the mobsters come into the store and tell the owner "nice place, be a shame if something happened to it"

    If the university says “youre not allowed to camp on the campus lawn” its violent rhetoric”. If you trample on the lawn of the facultys private residence at 4am its just an expression of justice.

    • Hook 'Em 2
  3. the Words Are Mean posse characterizing the universities’ coddling of them as “Violent Rhetoric”.

    is it any surprise the people with this type of perspective would reflexively consider everything a transgression and call everyone a nazi or fascist.

    these people were simply not bullied as much as they should have been. 

    IMG_6343.jpeg

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 1
  4. 6 hours ago, immamac said:

    honestly why do any of you even give a shit? I kinda feel like locking this thread. It's stupid. 

    You may not be familiar with 3rd amendment to the constitution: the right to mercilessly ridicule absolutely retarded leftists on the internet. James madison compels citizens to do so. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  5. 7 hours ago, Sam Lin said:

    Why are you catering to them? Go eat what you want!

    Teamwork and networking and all that jazz. We’re in south france and seafood restaurants dont play that vegetable game bullshit

  6. 10 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

    Edited to ask if you think antifa is not anti-fascist, and if so, why?

    Like the norks not having actual democratic representation of the people, “antifa” has nothing to do with opposing fascism. 

    That term is a cudgel used by ugly societal-rejects as an avenue to rebel against normal society. Probably because they hate their parents (you know, the true and original oppressors in their miserable lives). 

    • Hook 'Em 6
  7. Guys, when noted tabloid guardian writes “thousands protest against Israel”, it doesnt mean the people are “anti-israel”.

    Its especially more true if you write it in bold burnt orange text.

    (Will you extend this interpretive generosity towards people protesting against immigration, for example?)

    Its a silly singing contest, yes. But instead of recognizing the prima facie ABSURDITY of thousands of people protesting a single 20 year old girl participating in a silly singing contest, led by a teenager otherwise known for climate activism (what a high credibility icon!)….youre contorting yourself inside out to search for the REAL nuance. 

    Fella, you are lost in the sauce. 

    • Haha 2
  8. 3 hours ago, bolverk said:

    Ah, so you're not interested in an honest conversation. I took the time to answer your question with a thorough response. You just delete all that shit and then throw out more accusatorial queries. Finished engaging with you.

    You didnt remotely answer my question.

    I asked why the people who interrogated each of pronghorns posts and sources, didnt do when it came to the visegrad24 post. All of them are inarguably the same tone — against the protestors. 

    You counter-asked “why is pro-palestine framed as anti-israel”? Because greta thunberg, subject of the tweet, literally said this

    Quote

    Among the crowd of protesters waving Palestinian flags on Malmö’s town square was Greta Thunberg. “It is outrageous that Israel is allowed to participate”, said the environmental activist,

    Not wanting Israel to have participation is not anti-israel?

    Is protest “against Israel” not anti-Israel or is the guardian also wrong in its framing too?IMG_6266.thumb.jpeg.de75c9c5eb37a731955b8a2d0411f4e3.jpeg

    Then you submitted a bunch of personal statements which i didnt ask for and am frankly not interested in. I dont say that to be insulting, I say that because I didnt have suspicion of your anti-whatever and dont think the honesty of your beliefs need to be brought to trial. 

×
×
  • Create New...