Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

you may want to cover your eyes for this WR comp 

Wingo: 6 catches for 65 on 16 targets.... 4.06 yards/target

Livingstone: 6 catches for 175 yards on 9 targets...19.4 yards/target

Wingo is not an every down, consistent receiver at this point. He's an athletic freak with a ton of upside that will give you the chance at some big plays.  He's not a chain moving, reliable route running guy. His hands/pass catching ability are average imo.  Is Jaggy? Possibly, too early to tell.

i really miss second half of the season Golden.  He was nails and bailed the offense out numerous times. 

Edited by sunset87
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Codaxx said:

you may want to cover your eyes for this WR comp 

Wingo: 6 catches for 65 on 16 targets.... 4.06 yards/target

Livingstone: 6 catches for 175 yards on 9 targets...19.4 yards/target

Statistically relevant sample sizes, what are they and how do they work?

Posted
37 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

Statistically relevant sample sizes, what are they and how do they work?


sounds like someone who is about to trash all his country music CDs

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted

It never ceases to amaze me or make me chuckle when Sark acknowledges our redzone issues, yet does nothing to address them. I gotta say, it's quite impressive. For someone who people keep calling a "genius" and "wizard" on offense, we sure seem to suck inside the 20. Does genius and wizard have 20 yard to the endzone kryptonite? 

Posted
1 hour ago, sunset87 said:

Wingo is not an every down, consistent receiver at this point. He's an athletic freak with a ton of upside that will give you the chance at some big plays.  He's not a chain moving, reliable route running guy. His hands/pass catching ability are average imo.  Is Jaggy? Possibly, too early to tell.

i really miss second half of the season Golden.  He was nails and bailed the offense out numerous times. 

I would argue his hands are below average. His catching ability is on par with Gibson's carrying abilities and not fumble. 

Posted

2 game sample size stats and averages are eye rolls, for any team really, especially the ones that have played FCS opponents or have had 1 of their 2 games against a top 5 team in the country.

And I'm not talking about chronic stuff like red zone and whatnot. If 50% of a player's snaps for the season are against Ohio State, I'm willing to let a little more data be collected before talking about what his average yards per game or yards per catch are, both for the good and the bad.

We had 1 sack through 2 games last year, then had 45 over our next 14 games.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, William Bludworth said:

It never ceases to amaze me or make me chuckle when Sark acknowledges our redzone issues, yet does nothing to address them. I gotta say, it's quite impressive. For someone who people keep calling a "genius" and "wizard" on offense, we sure seem to suck inside the 20. Does genius and wizard have 20 yard to the endzone kryptonite? 

Do you watch the games? The issues go beyond Sark, execution by the players is a big part of it too. If you’re holding your breath trying to wait for Sark to find a way to scheme around the players weaknesses in the redzone good luck. Everyone needs to be better, this isn’t just a matter of Sark having play callers block in the redzone.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

2 game sample size stats and averages are eye rolls, for any team really, especially the ones that have played FCS opponents or have had 1 of their 2 games against a top 5 team in the country.

And I'm not talking about chronic stuff like red zone and whatnot. If 50% of a player's snaps for the season are against Ohio State, I'm willing to let a little more data be collected before talking about what his average yards per game or yards per catch are, both for the good and the bad.

We had 1 sack through 2 games last year, then had 45 over our next 14 games.

Correct, but that input will continue to be ignored.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...