Jump to content

Horndog

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1180
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Horndog

  1. Marco says stealing classified documents is a storage problem. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/marco-rubio-classified-top-secret-trump-storage-issue_n_631652d2e4b0536be047c4bf
  2. A backhand so powerful it caused the ball to become stuck in the racquet handle.
  3. Per CNN website they have a reporter in the courtroom. Presumably other media types there also. Likely can't communicate until there's a break.
  4. I don't suppose there will be a live audio or video feed of the hearing?
  5. The exact question posed was: "Anything she says publicly is no longer protected by atty client privilege correct?" That question was specifically directed at this quote from a dotard lawyer: "Habba: I’m somebody who has been in his office.. I have firsthand knowledge. I have never seen that. That is not the way his office looks.. He has guests frequently there." Those statements by Habba concern her own personal observations of the the dotard's office, not any communications between her and the dotard. They are not privileged and never will be. I agree that if a lawyer is stupid enough to repeat in public something that a client said to the lawyer during an attorney-client communication (e.g. the dotard told me he hid the documents in a toilet bowl tank), the privilege belongs to the client and is not waived by the lawyer's incompetence. But that's not what we are talking about.
  6. The question was about her public statements. Those would not be privileged because by definition they are not communications between lawyer and client.
  7. "... more described in more detail ..." Could it be more redundant?
  8. Yep. And the "2A" card is a handwritten statement of the dotard's devotion to gun rights rather than an FBI evidence marker.
  9. Just glanced through the DOJ Brief, and there were a couple of interesting things I did not know: When the 15 boxes were returned earlier in the year, NARA found classified documents that had been "unfoldered" (i.e. taken out of their folders containing the classified markings) and were intermingled with other records. It is an accepted rule of nature that documents are inanimate and do not remove themselves from folders and envelopes. Some of the papers had been "torn up." The DOJ had "multiple sources" of information that classified records remained at MAL after the attorney's certification to the contrary. Per Chuck Rosenberg (former federal prosecutor) on MSNBC last night, not only are classified documents maintained in the brightly-colored large-font-labeled folders, but the documents themselves have individual classification markings for each paragraph. Once they are removed from the marked folders, anyone looking at the documents has immediate knowledge of their classification status.
  10. Quite likely. But my point is that the DOJ could have pushed back and required a stronger certification based on actual knowledge and without the qualifiers. Especially since this involved highly sensitive document.
  11. I'm surprised that DOJ accepted this Certification as an indication of compliance with the Subpoena. It has all sorts of indicators of unreliability. "I have been designated to serve as Custodian of Records" rather then "I am Custodian of Records". (Who made the designation? When?) "Based upon information that has been provided to me . . . " (What information? Who provided it? When?) The information is true "to the best of my knowledge." (What is the knowledge and how was it acquired?) This is hardly a document that can be used as a basis for perjury. It would not be considered as competent evidence in a civil case.
  12. I'm assuming your use of "blackmale" was not intentional with respect to Ladybugs.
  13. I think they moved the center field scoreboard from D-F.
  14. So is Elmo.
  15. He claimed he did 1000 situps and push-ups every day, or some such BS.
  16. Haven't read the Motion. Was it filed seeking emergency relief? If so, the pro hac vice screw-up is especially comical. If not, it is not even facially serious.
  17. As usual with the Dotard, it's mostly performative. 1. Take the offensive, no matter how absurd the position. 2. Change the public dialog and distract from the real issue. 3. When the Motion is dismissed, rail about the rigged system. It's not about actually getting a favorable ruling. It's about maximizing the role as victim.
  18. Herschel doesn't think for himself. He has no ability to think at all.
  19. Most Rs think he meant "coup d'etat", which they support.
  20. Chances are greater that Cruz has a vagina than Warren having a penis.
×
×
  • Create New...