Mainly it's just mocking statsman individually rather than any real jabs at Texas. I'm sure Texas will figure it out whatever mistakes it has made with roster construction sooner rather than later. It's just amusing to us at Tech fans to be "taunted" over our NIL spending when our talent evaluation and roster construction seems to be working as it should and our success rate with transfers is currently very high.
I was interested to learn recently that, at Tech, the coaches are mostly divorced from the talent evaluation process. Obviously they convey certain needs, and are involved in the actual recruiting process (as coaches normally are), but for the most part it seems like talent evaluation and player targeting (HS and portal) is fully done by the GM's office without oversight from the head coach. The coaches seem to be mostly free to just focus on actually coaching football, rather than spending a big chunk of their time focusing on acquisitions. This is probably a big reason (along with our success rate with transfers) that James Blanchard has fended off many attempt to poach him so far.
I would be interested in learning how Texas and other NIL powerhouses go about this, because earlier I asserted/assumed that Tech was following the Texas model but considering what I've learned in the past few months from listening to Tech talking heads, it seems like our approach might be a bit different than others.