Jump to content

bschoolprof

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    5852
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bschoolprof

  1. That’s a shame because she has great movement. But yes, her command just disintegrates at times.
  2. Goode is in the game. I guess she will bat?
  3. this is a war crime. they need to call it now.
  4. UCLA's pitching may be slightly better. I was pretty impressed with Tinsley yesterday. Her changeup/riseball mix was pretty nasty.
  5. Yeah, I was getting early 2020 vibes as well but didn't want to jinx it or trigger another global pandemic. Also, two run HR for Stewart. Love all this freshman talent!
  6. another RBI double for henry.
  7. 4-0, top 3, and they are going to the pen already.
  8. Henry with an RBI double. Nice to see. But then caught fucking around in a rundown. Obstruction called on SD, she is safe at 3rd.
  9. here's a radio feed https://texas.leanplayer.com/
  10. Estelle in the circle. Henry getting some PT, which is nice. Mia in the infield is a choice. At least it's San Diego.
  11. I . . . the royal we
  12. We have the talent. I feel really good about our pitchers. The lineup will work itself out as the season goes on. Fielding will probably always be an adventure.
  13. That went about as I expected.
  14. Whitaker in to pinch. Better than Martinez, but I don’t have a fuzzy.
  15. In the playoffs , I agree. But early in the season we just wanna see what we got. So I get it.
  16. The camera work here is just one step above dad running gamechanger with his go pro.
  17. Martinez not seeing the ball well today. She’s like 0 for 8. Her approach is a mess.
  18. Mike loves the aggressive send.
  19. That ball didn’t hit her.
  20. Kavan with 4 Ks so far. Yes. She’s week to week. She did not look good in the inter squad imo.
  21. That ball was nuked. Terrible two strike pitch.
  22. There’s our normal fielding bullshit. Kavan locating well imo.
  23. Yeah, I see my misunderstanding now. I assumed they excluded you if you were seropositive. But it looks like they only excluded you if you had a confirmed covid infection (I'm assuming a positive PCR test). The numbers from the FDA don't tie out to the published study, which confused me, but I see now in the NEJM study they do list the results by serology status (i.e., antibody positive or negative). There is a significant effect for antibody positive patients, but it is small, which is probably why the EPIC-SR was a no results study. There are two other RCTs I know of on Paxlovid that are null results beyond EPIC-SR.
×
×
  • Create New...