Jump to content

bschoolprof

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    5622
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bschoolprof

  1. I agree with Scipio's 2-3 most important points from the defense breakdown: 1) PK got outcoached 2) Our defense did not really play that great in the 2nd half. I'm hearing a lot of the talking heads on radio/youtube today saying we got stuff figured out in the 2nd half. I don't think I totally buy that. 3) This OU roster has some glaring holes. If they had an upgraded WR and OL, they would have beaten us badly in this game.
  2. How in the world is a DC in 2023 not prepared for a hurry up offense? This is not some new fad invented last year. Pk is an enigma to me.
  3. Last year in the Alamo bowl we played so far off their receivers that easy come back routes were wide open all game. We never adjusted or challenged them.
  4. bschoolprof

    Outcoached

    In 15 minutes, you guys are gonna be fuckin fine with this. So I'll just sum it up this way, as fast as I can. That is the most humiliating game in the last fuckin 10 years I've been involved with. how can we fuckin not score 1st and goal from the 1? How could you fuckin do that? What do you think you are doing? This isn’t some goddamn game!!! It’s about our lives!!!!! Like I said 15 minutes from now you won’t give a shit, but I gotta fucking live with this embarrassing game for the rest of my fucking life!!
  5. Agree to disagree I guess. His biggest strength to me is on the whiteboard (designing an offense). He's elite. He's a wizard with using motion and formation to get his guys the most favorable match ups. But if we are talking actually picking plays in-game , reacting to what the defense is doing in the moment (or even scripting the beginning of games), I don't think he's elite. He seems rather average, and I think he might benefit from a talented partner/underling that can pursue more of a "let's take what the defense gives us in the confines of this offense" approach during games. In fact, I read on another board that the Washington coaches said this was Sark's biggest weakness and they used it against him in the Alamo bowl. He's too stubborn/prideful at times to just take what the defense is offering. But I agree there is no way he's handing over the keys to the sports car he designed to someone else. It's his baby, and that's what we got when we hired him.
  6. bschoolprof

    Outcoached

    Yes, we were outcoached. Blame goes all around. On the coaching side, we had the talent advantage overall, which helped us in quarters 2-4, but we lost a close one due to: 1) poor gameplan on defense. Our run defense has been solid all year, but we are not a great pass defense and have not really played a great throwing QB. Having no plan or adjustments for Gabriel's legs is also really bad. I still don't trust PK in big games. I won't even get into the boneheaded prevent we went into to lose us the game at the end. 2) poor clock management down the stretch. Sark seems to struggle with this. 3) poor red zone calls and execution (this is a season-long problem) 4) losing the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball (even before Majors went out). If you don't think intensity/fire played a role here, I don't know what to tell you. Per 995, Sark told his team to "withstand the surge" and play collected all week. In his pregrame interview, he said he told the team to "have fun." That shit makes Mack moist. You have to approach the OU game like a prison fight and it was obvious we did not match OU's intensity in the 1st quarter or even for the whole game for that matter. If you gave their staff our talent advantage, they would have beaten us badly. 5) there's a recent SNL skit where mom is taking pictures of her daughter and prom date, and dad thinks it would be funny to pose with a gun to tell the date not to get any ideas, but the dad ends up blowing his dick off. We seem to do that in every game, multiple times on offense. I have a hard time believing that's all on the players. However, I'm still predicting 10-2 with a rematch in the CCG.
  7. Sark is a great play designer. One of the best in the business. He’s not a great play caller in my opinion. He gets too cute yet too stubborn. His scripting at the beginning of games is dreadful at times. He’s also pretty bad at clock management. He would benefit from a play caller that he trusts, but I doubt he will ever turn over the reigns.
  8. Early on in this thread, I said I didn’t trust this guy to gameplan for big games. I still don’t.
  9. bschoolprof

    Outcoached

    We have no business being in any playoff. Washington, Michigan, Oregon, etc would kick the shit out of us.
  10. bschoolprof

    Outcoached

    [mora sr.] playoffs?? [/mora sr.]
  11. he needs to be kept on so the yankees keep sucking.
  12. That's Pk's natural inclination unfortunately. He's very soft when it comes to pass defense.
  13. Today was not a good outing. I'm back to hating him.
  14. bschoolprof

    Outcoached

    Well, it wasn't just the in-game coaching. The gameplans and prep were shitty too, particularly on defense. Good job boys.
  15. What buns do you use for cheesesteaks? The ones I get at HEB suck.
  16. I think he gets signed next year by an MLB team. He still throws hard (95+) and has tons of pitches. Someone will want him. Padres or Yankees.
  17. He should stick to banging his agent and escorts. Random skanks from the internet are dangerous.
  18. Mormons can use profanity now? Fucking unreal.
  19. I had forgotten about Tony Orlando's utter inability to get off the field on 3rd and 15+. Thanks.
  20. Boone should keep his job; it's not his fault Cashman is an idiot. Saw my first ever game at Yankee stadium this summer. As a baseball fan it was great - the kids got a big kick out of it. Taking the subway to/from the game was a breeze. Actually getting into the stadium was a total shitshow of epic proportions.
  21. Insurance folks . . . one thing that keeps driving my (really our) homeowner premiums up is every asshole in my neighborhood seems to get a new roof every 5 years, no doubt because some roofer grifter tells him there's hail damage. The frequency and regularity of this is not something we should be insuring, at least not like this. Question: are insurance companies required by state law to offer full replacement cost coverage on roofs? If not, why do they? I understand why we, as a society, want full replacement cost coverage on a house - if it burns down, we need a new house to live in, on land we already own. But why are roofs insured this way? If a hailstorm totals my 1982 Ford Fiesta, I don't expect my auto carrier to buy me a brand new car. Why should I have this expectation for a roof? Can't insurers raise the deductible on roofs and/or move to a depreciated value model for roofs? That would eliminate a lot of the shenanigans I see in my area. Maybe they are already doing this.
  22. Is it an eskimo hut? I know just the guy.
  23. I'm seeing a high of 74 on Saturday? Holy shit.
  24. I think so. It's an over the top sex scene with supe powers. I agree it has the same feel, and irreverently dark gory humor The Boys has, but's it's nowhere near as good. It's just ok.
×
×
  • Create New...