Jump to content

Huckleberry

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    13609
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by Huckleberry

  1. It's almost like this should have been the obvious result even in the midst of all the usual spring training panic.
  2. I wouldn't say that's spot on. It's 11 out of 32 that they hit. Remember, they do extremely stupid stuff like downgrading recruits as COLLEGE PROSPECTS because they don't think they are what a prototypical PROFESSIONAL left tackle or edge rusher looks like. I don't give a fuck if someone is a prototypical NFL position-specific prospect if he's going to be a badass in college at that position. So if they're going to do stupid shit like downgrade incredible college prospects because they're not incredible NFL prospects then they better at least get that right. Here are the top 10 2021 247 recruits: #1 Quinn Ewers - 7th round #2 JT Tuimolau - 2nd round #3 Korey Foreman - Still in college transferred from USC to Fresno State because he sure as shit isn't a first round pick #4 Leonard Taylor - Undrafted free agent signed with Jets #5 JC Latham - #7 overall pick 2024 #6 Jack Sawyer - 4th round #7 Donovan Jackson - #24 overall #8 Caleb Williams - #1 overall 2024 #9 Emeka Egbuka - #19 overall #10 Tommy Brockermeyer - lol no 4 out of 10 were first round picks. This is the cream of the crop, the ones they spend the most time on, when they tell everyone that they rank based on NFL projection. Which, of course, is stupid because their subscribers care about college football. And they still can't bat .500 on the most heavily scrutinized prospects. Look, overall you want better classes. Throw them all in a bucket and you'll be much better off signing a bunch of top prospects. But that graphic is terribly misleading. Every single one of those 4-stars you see is a miss. And I haven't even gotten into shit like Walter Nolen who the NFL drafted on projection and sure as shit wasn't a 5-star college player.
  3. This is a very stupid post. I'm starting to realize that people should complain less about your AI image posts because when you try to think it's invariably a disaster. Who are the identity politics morons in the Democratic Party you're referring to? They don't exist in any quantity that matters but your mushy brain thinks they do because Republicans say so. The GOP is the party of identity politics. Your entire post that you think is fresh new thinking is exactly what Democrats have been doing to lose for decades.
  4. http://www.boydsworld.com/baseball/isr/currentisr.html Gap between us and #2 is bigger than the gap between #2 and #17.
  5. I know most people realized it but I was providing a public service because bots are pretty damn good at faking A&M online behavior. It's almost understandable to get fooled by one in that situation because hive mind cultists are the easiest to fake.
  6. Alyssa is a bot
  7. Appropriate response is something like this one
  8. And his most appearances in a season was 74. Out of 162. A bit less than every day.
  9. No, no he could not.
  10. They would 100% be asking if they were the greatest team of all time if they had had our season so far and were 19-2 in the SEC. Zero doubt.
  11. America first let's honor an Italian I mean at this point you have to be an idiot not to realize it's just racism
  12. I agree that durability hurt his draft position, as it should.
  13. Absolutely correct on Ewers. He obviously didn't deserve to be a consensus #1 prospect mainly because of processing speed which is what recruiting services are the worst at identifying. But he is and was much better than some of the guys who went before him.
  14. Exactly. The word "nearly" is doing a lot of work in his post considering it's about the possibility of Texas A&M finding a way to lose.
  15. https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/464595378990747650
  16. This is not a good take. Shedeur Sanders was not a very good and certainly not great college QB. He gamed the stats by holding on to the ball forever, ignoring positive plays for his offense in search of highlights, and only throwing once a receiver was already open. His high completion percentage wasn't a positive, it was a result of his game-losing strategy. Here is one of the early and glaring examples of this from this past season. He had just thrown an absolutely terrible pick 6 from his own end zone to give Nebraska a 14-0 lead. The stadium was rocking, the defense was amped up, and they needed something positive. The RT is shook and totally blows his blocking assignment but Sanders escapes, great job Shedeur. Now you have a chance to quiet settle your team down a bit and set them up with a nice and easy 2nd and 1 or get a first down. All you have to do is throw to the wide open guy right in front of your face. What's that? You'd rather ignore him and look 30 yards downfield for a highlight reel play? Sorry, you're gonna get run down from behind by a Nebraska LB. So now it's 2nd and 15 instead of 2nd and 1. Good thing the NFL won't have any linebackers who can run you down. 20:50 mark Shedeur Sanders had a bad OL. Shedeur Sanders made that bad OL look even worse than they were because he loved to make game-losing plays.
  17. Lolwut We lost at the very end of the game to the only team actually doing better in this draft.
  18. Jesus Christ man, that's your response?
  19. Exactly. The only reason people thought he'd go high is because he's a QB and it's a draft without top end QB talent. The stories planted in the last day or two are 100% correct. He takes WAY too long to get rid of the ball, he doesn't throw until receivers are already open, he just basically shows very little to no anticipation. That's a recipe for disaster in the NFL.
  20. If voting were right now who would be y'all's pick for AL Cy Young and why would it be Forrest Whitley?
  21. Congratulations. I hope it's sincere reflection.
  22. Trying to absolve themselves of responsibility. Only morons didn't see this coming so they're either stupid or just assholes who thought they would escape unharmed. Or both.
  23. I've had good experience with them for b2b shipments but have had your experience with receiving b2c deliveries.
×
×
  • Create New...