Didn't get selected; however, it was a pain in the ass process.
Check in at 8.
Outside the courtroom by 9. Told that we'd either be selected or let go by 11. Nothing.
At noon, we finally go in. Two hours of attorney questioning/statements. Told to recess for 20 mins to get the jury selected. Hour and a half later, and I'm not picked. Walked out after 3. Geez.
The case, btw, was some Mexican dude who had been busted dealing 8 (grams?) of meth. He had just pled guilty, so the trial would have been for the punishment - 5-99 years. One dumb chick asked the judge what meth was. Perhaps she was playing 3-D chess and figured a question like that would preclude her from serving. Anyway, it was only supposed to a be a 2-day thing, so I'm kind of disappointed in not getting picked.
One last thing. It's rare to be in a room of your random peers and find out how absolutely, GD stupid much the population is. The question that took 2 hours to answer took several different explanations from the judge, as well as both sets of attorneys. Would you be wiling to consider the entire spectrum of punishment? I.E. min of 5; max of 99. Obviously, 99 years is extreme - even for most anti-drug sorts; however, most couldn't distinguish between considering and doing. The defense attorneys were wrapping themselves in knots because they were going lose a huge segment of those that would probably be favorable to their cause. The judge actually had to change the wording of the question, so the defense didn't lose over 50% of those present.