Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42289
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. That's bizarre. Haven't been paying much attention, but does K-C have consumer meds? ETA: Answer seems to be no.
  2. Well, it is kind of hard to plan an offense on plays your QB has previously showed a marked tendency not to make. That's kind of what we're bitching about in the first place.
  3. Having represented SoftLayer/Rackspace, it's a definite moneymaker. But yeah, getting and keeping customers seems to be kind of the devil in the details. Also, papering up the investments and the customer agreements is tricky too, or can be on a volume basis.
  4. The Sark disconnect has become pretty clear. His talent is unable to run his preferred schemes with consistency. It's been his bugbear since he got here to a greater or lesser degrees. The talent drop-off (or different skill set if you prefer) this year has slapped him in the face with that reality in a way the previous couple of years did not. And seems to have forced some adjustments that we haven't really seen before in the OU game plan and Vanderbilt. The question then becomes: Is he too stubborn to see what's in front of his face in practice and game situations Is he being deceived by assistant coaches as to the actual capability of talent Is he so distracted by personal matters, the duties of a HC, or some combination that it permits him to maintain his illusions Or some combination of the three. That he has adapted a couple of times indicates perhaps that he's not so stubborn. Curiously, he has adapted against our more highly ranked opponents and reverted to tendency against lesser opponents, which shows some degree of inflexibility or stubbornness: he thinks we should be able to run his preferred schemes against SEC cellar dwellers, but also "admits" that we can't against top 10 opponents. I'm not sure hiring an OC solves any of this except perhaps distraction, if it frees him to pay better attention to other things. It might help, too, if that coach is unflinchingly honest with him about what the talent can and can't reliably do. But that can be addressed with assistants other than the OC.
  5. Too late to edit. Saw "large corporation." So they have no exemptions and a constable ought to be able to go seize some shit worth the amount of your judgment, pretty easily. One problem you may run into, though, is most corporations have multiple subsidiaries and whatnot and so finding assets actually owned by the corporation you have a judgment against might be a challenge. However, once you send a constable out on a writ of execution, the people present may not have the snap to assert that everything on site is owned by X Corp Assets, LLC instead of X Corp. They will probably call the legal department, who will probably call you and arrange a settlement, post-haste.
  6. Bio info is slim, but her father is supposedly Armenian and served in the Korean War before college. She's 26. Very fishy.
  7. As has been noted here often, Mack could sell ice to eskimos. He's very personable. When we won in 2005/6, I got a little teary watching him and thought "one of the good guys finally won something." I could forgive all of his foibles up until the end. At the end, he showed himself to be a far less "great person" than I had previously believed. That was a bummer and still is.
  8. Lickspittles.
  9. What kind of defendant? Natural person or entity? In either case, one thing you can do is issue a writ of execution. In that, a constable goes to the residence or place of business and seizes non-exempt property to satisfy the judgment. If a person, they have exemptions that a constable is unlikely to "pierce" except in a really obvious case. Businesses have no exemptions. If you happen to know where their bank is, you can do a writ of garnishment, and if there are sufficient funds, that is one of the swiftest and surest ways of getting paid.
  10. But Biden used an Autopen!
  11. Well, tbh, if you pick an argument with five different posters, odds are good that three of em are lawdogs.
  12. I suppose the end-zone DPI wasn't called because the official whose first-line call it was called it a TD. But others should have tossed the flag.
  13. All other things about Nancy Mace aside, she is a Senator from South fucking Carolina. The MAGA cult has produced entirely too many political celebrities. Silver Spurs and Texas Cowboys should have no idea who she is and should be most unimpressed by anything about her./seen hotter on campus More evidence that it is, in fact, a cult.
  14. Just make it simple. I'm sure the car has a USB-A receptacle, the rectangle, so you just need a USB-A to USB-C. If you want to get kinky, I guess you can find a Y cable with USB-C and Lightning.
  15. Yep they can't gouge or discount for people paying with SNAP. But for the time being, no one is paying with SNAP.
  16. Article debunking madman theory, especially in Trump's case. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/why-trump-s-madman-act-doesn-t-work
  17. Ben Wittes on the posture of the criminal case. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-situation--james-comey-is-just-asking-questions Yes, Wittes is butt-buddies with Comey, but it's a solid explainer. As I said on multiple occasions before, it's good that we have this due process shit for when Trump tries to turn the tables.
  18. In the final analysis, it was just a 2-pointer, not a touchdown. So BFD.
  19. What's funny is on the first sideline pass to Wingo, duplicating last week, Arch actually led him and he had to take a step forward to catch it. I think Wingo was surprised. I have to confess that I thought it was the usual Arch just a little off with his passes, this time the error being a "positive" one. But no, Arch and the WR were more consistently "in rhythm" all game.
  20. Tucker Carlson had Nick Fuentes on his show and basically endorsed him, including his antisemitism. As you are probably aware, Fuentes is the one Nazi that's a little too open about his Naziness for the rest of the Nazis. The Nazis, then, are in a tizzy about whether to condemn Tucker or not. Heritage, in particular its Kommandant, refused to condemn Tucker and Fuentes, rather actually supporting them and implicitly endorsing their Naziness.
  21. On the pylon deal, I don't think that's right. Yes, the camera was a little bit behind the pylon looking forward and that introduces a "parallax" error. But you can also see the entire front edge of the goal line and mentally project a plane upward from that. The ball was never close to that plane, much less across it. The parallax error made it seem the ball was closer to the pylon than it was. There apparently is an "official" camera in the pylon itself, but it would be subject to the same type of error as the broadcast camera, because a pylon isn't exactly a rigid structure, so you'd have to do the same plane projection as with the broadcast camera and isn't inherently more accurate.
  22. Complete suck.
×
×
  • Create New...