Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    42682
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. It was a weak hold.
  2. Wingo's kinda getting his shit together.
  3. That was a hell of play by the DB on Jaggy.
  4. Got a hold on Wingo. Whew.
  5. Aggy is probably going to fuck us up good. Starting to think about not watching that game.
  6. Goddamn Roberson.
  7. Arch gonna have 500 yards.
  8. Always a gap in our zone and always a receiver in it.
  9. OL has gone from complete asswater to serviceable.
  10. Gzus, Burke with the tackle in the backfield. Taaffe deked and whiffed.
  11. There was some . . . but it was . . . lumbering.
  12. The good news is Akina's zone thing is less vulnerable in the red zone. So, if we can keep them from scoring on explosives, we trade field goals for touchdowns.
  13. That was Akina's fault.
  14. We seem to start a lil slow on D, always have under PK.
  15. Well, that probably wasn't Akina's fault.
  16. https://thetvapp.link/cfb/arkansas-razorbacks-texas-longhorns/30655886856
  17. It's been a minute, but I don't think the White House was open the day/night before games. They were degenerates, but they performed, and for the most part avoided Bobby Layne pre and mid game antics, I think.
  18. Anyone who's spent much time around hourly workers knows they'll do whatever to increase the size of their paycheck. Diddle withholding, skip insurance, skip 401k. And that probably extends into some salaried workers at the lower end as well.
  19. Maybe Dwight wants to fuck her.
  20. Fun thing about the SECrant thread. They're less credulous of the rumors and basically laughing at us for a) indulging all the rumors and b) wanting to shitcan a coach that took us to the Final Four the last two years. Think about that for a minute. SECrant.
  21. They're going to appeal and string this out. It's gonna cost Candy baby a shitload.
  22. Also, taking it out of the rubric of legal analysis, and putting it purely in terms of politics or even political philosophy, SCOTUS in its shadow docket decisions is valuing the "rights" or power of the executive/government over the rights of the people. Specifically the executive. The legalistic excuse is that stays (or unstaying in some cases) are only temporary, pending a full decision on the merits. But, again in the real world, these stays last months or years before a more permanent solution is reached by a full decision on the merits. And it may well be that they ultimately rule against the executive/government, but the harm is mostly done by then. Which tells you that their harm analyses are wrong, ab initio.
  23. So, on the lawsuit. Candy-baby has filed a motion to dismiss, but not on the public figure/actual malice standard that is typical in a defamation lawsuit. The first ground is procedural in that the lawsuit is in Delaware and is against her, her LLC and her husbands (or their) LLC. Both the LLCs are Delaware, so that's proper, but she's in Nashville. So it seems the court may lack personal jurisdiction over her. Worst case, the Macrons have to maintain one suit in Delaware and one in Nashville. But the potentially dispositive aspect of the motion is much more troubling. France has a three-month statute of limitations on defamation cases. That's three months from publication of the defamatory statement. A period long past. This is a US lawsuit against a US defendant, but by French plaintiffs. Pretty arguably, French law applies, including limitations, so this whole suit is probably going bye-bye. God dammit.
×
×
  • Create New...