Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    40375
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. That furriner wants your cookie, mate.
  2. Does the transcript get into the quid pro quo for her testimony?
  3. Yeah, like you don't generally release investigation materials, a conventional US government or state doesn't advertise or crow about criminal investigations, other than to announce them, maybe. This government? Maybe not so much, if one is actually ongoing. The target of such an investigation is free to talk/complain about it, although it's usually not in their interest to do so. But people like Schiff and James, and Comey, Clapper, et al., who don't really have much exposure, might well be speaking out about it.
  4. No dammit, it's because they removed the barrel full of darkies that the cracker was minding.
  5. Haha, awesome Judge Berman. Take some performative bullshit designed to place blame on judges -- again -- and throw it back in the fat fuckin turd's face, along with Blondi and fucking guy Patel.
  6. Not sure inheriting a painting company puts you on third. In some cases maybe, but more like safe at first. Democrats do have to own doing very little for the Jameses of the world. Neither have Republicans, though, other than owning the libz. It's Trump's talking point. He thinks it's a bad thing.
  7. He probably is, but getting out from under a performative lege, governor and BOR was a high priority, I'm sure.
  8. Bringing this back to earth, I see that Mazda is making a 3.0 inline six. Those are getting rare these days, even among bimmers. Kind of disappointing numbers, though. https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a43975258/2024-mazda-cx-90-inline-six-engine/
  9. Well, Dallas has more murders ytd (113) than DC (101). So does Houston (112 through May).
  10. Further to this, Royce Lamberth, Longhorn of the DC District Court, found that Bolton probably did disclose information in violation of at least his confidentiality agreement, if not classified information per se. In June 2020, five years and two months ago. I don't suppose limitations can be interposed as a defense to a search warrant, but it's going to make an indictment problematic. Rap/ride and all that. Don't have much pity for Bolton, but the tactics are obnoxious as fuck.
  11. Well, let's also remember that Kash Patel can't issue a search warrant unilaterally. It had to be signed off by a federal judge. The District of Maryland only has one Trump appointee, but it's usually Magistrate Judges that sign off on warrants, and one could be a sleeper agent. Possibly more likely is that someone lied to secure the warrant. Ironically, it would seem any charges here would be related to mishandling of classified information. And the statute of limitations on that is five years and Bolton was out of government by 2020 at the latest.
  12. Back to the Trump civil fraud appeal. The opinion(s) are a divided mess. Being a civil case, AG James is free to appeal it to the ultimate NY court of appeals, which she has vowed to do. Looking at it further, I don't think the NY court of appeals analysis will hold up on further appeal. It doesn't make any sense. On one hand, it says it's an unconstitutional fine or penalty in violation of the 8th Amendment. That's something you find when an award is properly calculated, but the statutory scheme that allows it is over-generous or over-punitive, or as applied to the particular facts and damage award, it's just excessive. It's not something you hold when there are simple errors in the damage calculation. On the other hand, the ruling says the disgorgement penalty was miscalculated, or relied on two things, the Old Post Office lease and the Ferry Point golf course operating agreement, where fraud wasn't proven or proven adequately. That would have knocked the award down by $195M by the court of appeals' own calculation. When damages are miscalculated, or reliant on some element that isn't proper or proven, you remand to the trial court for a recalculation or retrial on those issues. But that's obviously not what they did here. They should have either remitted the disgorgement by the $195M or sent it back to Engoron to do so. I don't think that's going to survive further appeal. Notably, the court of appeals did affirm all other aspects of the judgment, including the injunctive portions where Trump can't own a business chartered in NY. It's possible that the further appeal undoes that, too, but it seems rather unlikely.
  13. Is it really a rebranding if you don't change the word mark?
  14. And knock the fuck out of some Trumpkins on the way to the polls.
  15. I might argue that Cracker Barrel is a strong enough brand that everyone knows what it is. So there's no need for Cletus and the barrel o darkies. It's not like they're starting from scratch and need to inform people what they are.
  16. Well, then, how do the clerks and young attorneys become seasoned attorneys? It's incumbent on us to know our arguments and the counter-arguments. And that's a skill that's honed by doing. If the young and inexperienced aren't doing, I don't know how they'll ever become experienced. I've never been surprised by opposing counsel's argument, sometimes their factual assertions, but rarely or never the argument itself. Maybe it's because I've spent most of my life in federal courts, where the written argument is 90% of it. I can see a lot more surprise in Texas state court, where briefing gets ignored in favor of oral argument.
  17. What an immense turd that guy is.
  18. Some background. Cracker Barrel is changing its logo from this: To this: And MAGA is absolutely losing its shit, calling the above woke. I always thought the barrel was full of crackers, but I guess it must have been full of darkies. Or maybe it's the fact that Cracker Barrel actually treats its LGBTQ employees like human beings, which, of course, has nothing to do with the logo.
  19. Well, I consider having a law that is alternately enforced or not enforced, according to whim of administration to be fucked up and symbolic of a legal scheme that is in bad need of reform. But it's not the biggest fucked up thing, no, you're right there. It appears that a lot of the world is pretty similar to the US, though, misdemeanor first offense, often not enforced, and harsher penalties for repeat offenders. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=829757
  20. NPR is pRoPAganDa!!11!!111!
  21. Affirmed in all other respects, though. Told y'all that monetary part was likely excessive. On appeal, it seems that the monetary award is characterized as "disgorgement," which means coughing up all ill-gotten gains, that is, all of the loan proceeds that were tainted by fraud. I didn't catch that that was the nature of the remedy at the trial level. It is unclear to me whether the disgorgement can be recalculated on retrial or not. Its nature is usually "equitable," meaning entirely in the judge's discretion and not subject to a burden of proof, so that would seem to tend to mean that the judge is free to halve it or quarter it or otherwise reduce it.
  22. Forgot about that cooze. She's not very articulate. He really did bring along every sycophant and suck up.
  23. In yet another facet of our fucked-up immigration policy, first time unlawful or improper entry into the United States is indeed a crime, albeit a misdemeanor. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325 Second and subsequent unlawful entries are a minor felony. You are correct that the process of removing or deporting unlawful entrants is a civil matter, but it can also result in criminal charges. Historically, though, we have not criminally charged first-time or even second-time unlawful entrants. Only chronic re-enterers get charged criminally. No, a financial consultant that does a lot of expert witness work.
  24. Christians, about 100%. "Christians," about 0%.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...