Jump to content

TwiceHorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    39581
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by TwiceHorn

  1. I got more gibberish than the Bible got Psalms.
  2. I loved it. Dirt. Bags. All the way. Ten strikeouts isn't what you expect from a team with no player having double digit HR.
  3. I was just expecting more dirtbagginess from Coastal. Disappointed. Great pitching from their starter, though.
  4. Well, wish there weren't two outs in the last AB.
  5. There was a good bit of luck for LSU on that, as well. Like blOwU softball. I don't think they're all that, but you can't dick around with them.
  6. More pffffttttffft.
  7. Eight RISP and it's never felt for a second like one might score. Lots of opportunities and I believed Coastal would take advantage.
  8. They look . . . limp. LSU is not some juggernaut. But they're an experienced CWS team.
  9. LSU probably gon explode this half.
  10. Coastal is done. We're gonna fall 2 behind LSU. Goddamn you pig.
  11. Alexander, Anderson, Asshole, whatever.
  12. Didn't do shit in Tora Bora. ETA: Well, maybe we didn't use it there. Could have sworn we did.
  13. Pppffffffttttt. Goddammit.
  14. If Coastal pitcher lets up, they're in deep doodoo. Of course Alexander been flirtin with disaster all night, but Coastal keeps letting him off the hook
  15. Coastal trying to throw the whole thing away.
  16. Bout to give up on Coastal.
  17. Goddammit Coastal. I'm gonna have to quit watching this shit.
  18. Glove caught up In the fence.
  19. Coastal finna fuck the dog. Correction, they're fucking the dog. The question is whether for keeps. Let these lucky fuckers hang around with a lead and you'll be donezeo.
  20. The Doc Holliday on that guy (or Johnny Ringo) is one of the better pornstaches I have seen.
  21. The way I think it works or is supposed to work is the original text gets original intent, amended text gets original intent as of the time of the amendment.
  22. Well, there are a couple of different aspects to this guy's paper. First is that "we the people" was intended to exclude non-whites. Second is that it was proper and right for it to do so. I think the former, although a repugnant idea, could be the subject of an award-winning paper. The second aspect or topic is going to be far less defensible. The article above ascribes the first topic or subject to the paper. Ibram X. Kendi could have written that.
  23. What if they are 100% accurate?
  24. I think it is theoretically possible to have a top paper that contains disgusting ideas. And that it perhaps should be awarded for its research or writing quality.
×
×
  • Create New...