Jump to content

Hagbard Celine

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    18357
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hagbard Celine

  1. his statement about following court orders was a terrible mistake whether lying or not, he's given the left a pivot and the press a wedge "you said you follow court orders but you fired the guy who pointed out you are burning $500m in perishable food because you're not following a court order, which is it?" this is so easy and the dems are SSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO stupid running false-flag astroturfing on every pub rep office email and voicemail with this 1 message is soooo easy "i want my free food! - we're in charge now - why are we letting it rot? - give it to MAGA!"
  2. BREAKING 20 MINUTES AGO 21 min ago “I always abide by the courts,” Trump says after several policy priorities were halted From CNN's Donald Judd President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will “always abide by the courts,” after reporters asked if he’d follow a judge’s ruling if it blocked one of his administration’s policy priorities. “Well, I always abide by the courts, and then I’ll have to appeal it. But then what he’s done is he’s slowed down the momentum, and it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books,” Trump said. “So yeah, the answer is, I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we’ll appeal, but appeals take a long time.”
  3. BREAKING 20 MINUTES AGO 21 min ago “I always abide by the courts,” Trump says after several policy priorities were halted From CNN's Donald Judd President Donald Trump said Tuesday he will “always abide by the courts,” after reporters asked if he’d follow a judge’s ruling if it blocked one of his administration’s policy priorities. “Well, I always abide by the courts, and then I’ll have to appeal it. But then what he’s done is he’s slowed down the momentum, and it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books,” Trump said. “So yeah, the answer is, I always abide by the courts, always abide by them, and we’ll appeal, but appeals take a long time.”
  4. i looked at this last night i was told no maths - my understanding is 67 is the senate conviction requirement - no VP tiebreaks - & i'm factoring the 2 current indeps as blue current score: blue 47, red 53 in 26 (if we have elections) in play: 13 blue, 22 red we need 33 of 35 some will stand down, a couple will pass on, but here's the moonshot list it's never happened but oh what a glorious day it would be ORANGE SHITGIBBON: YOU'RE FIRED! VANCE: YOU'RE FIRED TOO! under the constitution, no appeal, instant removal from office, barred from ever holding office again i'm saying there's a chance Minnesota Tina Smith Democratic March 4, 1958 (age 66) Colorado John Hickenlooper Democratic February 7, 1952 (age 73) Delaware Chris Coons Democratic September 9, 1963 (age 61) Georgia Jon Ossoff Democratic February 16, 1987 (age 37) Illinois Dick Durbin Democratic November 21, 1944 (age 80) Massachusetts Ed Markey Democratic July 11, 1946 (age 78) Michigan Gary Peters Democratic December 1, 1958 (age 66) New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen Democratic January 28, 1947 (age 78) New Jersey Cory Booker Democratic April 27, 1969 (age 55) New Mexico Ben Ray Luján Democratic June 7, 1972 (age 52) Oregon Jeff Merkley Democratic October 24, 1956 (age 68) Rhode Island Jack Reed Democratic November 12, 1949 (age 75) Virginia Mark Warner Democratic December 15, 1954 (age 70) Alabama Tommy Tuberville Republican September 18, 1954 (age 70) Alaska Dan Sullivan Republican November 13, 1964 (age 60) Arkansas Tom Cotton Republican May 13, 1977 (age 47) Florida Ashley Moody Republican March 28, 1975 (age 49) Idaho Jim Risch Republican May 3, 1943 (age 81) Iowa Joni Ernst Republican July 1, 1970 (age 54) Kansas Roger Marshall Republican August 9, 1960 (age 64) Kentucky Mitch McConnell Republican February 20, 1942 (age 82) Louisiana Bill Cassidy Republican September 28, 1957 (age 67) Maine Susan Collins Republican December 7, 1952 (age 72) Mississippi Cindy Hyde-Smith Republican May 10, 1959 (age 65) Montana Steve Daines Republican August 20, 1962 (age 62) Nebraska Pete Ricketts Republican August 19, 1964 (age 60) North Carolina Thom Tillis Republican August 30, 1960 (age 64) Ohio Jon Husted Republican August 25, 1967 (age 57) Oklahoma Markwayne Mullin Republican July 26, 1977 (age 47) South Carolina Lindsey Graham Republican July 9, 1955 (age 69) South Dakota Mike Rounds Republican October 24, 1954 (age 70) Tennessee Bill Hagerty Republican August 14, 1959 (age 65) Texas John Cornyn Republican February 2, 1952 (age 73) West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito Republican November 26, 1953 (age 71) Wyoming Cynthia Lummis Republican September 10, 1954 (age 70)
  5. #teammarshallmadisonholla i hope you're goddamn right ray of hope: shitgibbon is bitching this afternoon about the courts slowing him down hitler didn't bitch - he went and got the rulings he wanted in the category of bitchassedness, loompa is creating an endless vortex of timesuck for himself in gaza unfortunately for the palestinians - bad for them - good for us - he has less time to fuck shit up over here
  6. the landing at lake pleasant https://www.facebook.com/BoneyardSafari/videos/and-touch-down-of-philippine-mars-c-flyk-at-lake-pleasant-az-philippinemars-mart/501922605900260/
  7. THEY BOLTED!!!!!! it's gone to az fucking weasels https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/c-flyk#391520de they turned off the ads-b over indio it either turned left and went to havasu, set down in the salton sea (doubtful), or made for the gila river we'll find out tomorrow
  8. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/he-gets-to-make-the-decisions-jim-jordan-argues-trump-can-ignore-judges/ar-AA1yHcld?apiversion=v2&noservercache=1&domshim=1&renderwebcomponents=1&wcseo=1&batchservertelemetry=1&noservertelemetry=1 'He gets to make the decisions!' Jim Jordan argues Trump can ignore judges Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) argued on CNN Sunday that the Constitution gives President Trump the power to make the decisions he feels are best for the country, checks and balances from Congress and the courts be damned. Inside Politics host Manu Raju asked Jordan about a Reagan-appointed federal judge who argued "the president is going too far" on policy changes like rescinding birthright citizenship. "I'm talking about, there's a pattern where judges are saying they're going too far on these issues," Raju pressed after Jordan argued it was "just one judge" who blocked Trump's order to end birthright citizenship. "All I know is, again, Article Two, Section One, the very first sentence, 'The executive power shall be vested in a president,'" Jordan said, citing the Constitution. "I think it's important, 'a president of the United States of America,' not in bureaucrats, not in career people — in the president. The guy who put his name on the ballot." Jordan continued, "This is a fundamental difference we have with the left. The left thinks, 'Oh, it's the career experts who make the decisions.' That's not how our country works. It's the guy who puts his name on the ballot, gets elected by 'We the people.' He gets to make the decisions, or she gets to make the decisions. That's how — we don't want the Faucis of the world and all the people in the bureaucracy making the decisions. We want the guy who puts their name on the ballot and gets elected by the American people." "But, you guys are elected, too, you know, co-equal branch of the government," Raju said, stopping short of discussing the system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch of government from wielding all the power.
  9. 'Stepping very close to dangerous ground': J.D. Vance triggers alarm for CNN legal expert Brad Reed ~3 minutes CNN legal analyst Elie Honig on Monday warned that Vice President J.D. Vance is nudging the United States toward total lawlessness with his suggestions that judges have no power to rule against the executive branch. While discussing Vance's weekend attacks on judges who have shot down Trump administration policies, Honig argued that the vice president was heading into uncharted territory with respect to the rule of law. J.D. Vance said over the weekend that a judge who halted Elon Musk from accessing Treasury records was overstepping their authority. "Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power," he posted on social media. "J.D. Vance is really stepping very close to dangerous ground with that statement and he knows it," he said. "The notion that the courts cannot stop the executive from doing what he wants, the notion that the executive may have the option of defying the courts, that is completely beyond even what the most extreme right-wing conservative theory in favor of broad executive power has ever argued. "Now, look, there is a very broad view of executive power, sometimes it's called the unitary executive theory, which holds essentially that the president is all-powerful within the executive branch. But even proponents of that theory do not say that the president is free to disregard an order of the court. If that were to happen, that is a line in the sand that has not been crossed." ALSO READ: 'A tax on Americans': Ex-Trump official warns he's playing with fire on economic policy Honig also predicted that, were Trump to cross this line, the United States Supreme Court would slap him down hard even though Trump himself had appointed three justices currently serving on it. "This Supreme Court has generally taken a broad view of executive power but I also think it's a mistake to say, 'Oh... they ruled in favor of Trump on immunity, they're going to do whatever he said.' They have rejected Donald Trump at many key junctures," he said. "They rejected his election fraud claims. They rejected some of his efforts to stop prosecutors from taking steps against him. They rejected his efforts to resist a subpoena. So I think this Supreme Court will not tolerate if the executive branch crosses that line of defying the courts."
  10. anyone that lives in the bay area or san diego please see my posts in the airplane fanatic thread in hobbies - the last ww2 large flying boat (martin mars phillipine mars) is moored at alameda seaplane base scheduled to make 2nd to last or last flight to san diego or an arizona lake tomorrow
  11. https://pimaair.org/martin-mars/
  12. NOTE THE SAN DIEGO STOP IS STILL NOT CONFIRMED THE ITINERARY FROM ALAMEDA IS NOT CONFIRMED
  13. BAY AREA ALERT SAN DIEGO ALERT THE LAST MARTIN MARS FLEW FROM VANCOUVER TO ALAMEDA YESTERDAY IT IS SCHEDULED TO FLY TO SAN DIEGO TOMORROW (TUESDAY) THEN IT WILL FLY TO AN "UNDISCLOSED" LAKE IN ARIZONA where it will be taken apart and trucked to pima THIS IS THE LAST TIME A LARGE SEAPLANE WILL TAKE TO THE AIR if you live in the bay area, especially if you have kids, pack a cooler and get to the alameda seaplane pier before sunrise TOMORROW!!!!! - departure time is not announced 7 were built - the 2 survivors were delivered to the US Navy in 1946 - others at bottom of ocean or broken up https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/re-engined-philippine-mars-ready-for-final-flight/ https://vintageaviationnews.com/warbirds-news/philippine-mars-takes-flight-again-embarking-on-its-journey-west.html https://skiesmag.com/news/philippine-mars-lands-in-san-francisco-bay-en-route-to-final-resting-place/ https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/wwii-flying-boat-20157568.php (visible in read mode) https://www.scimag.news/news-en/112365/marooned-in-maintenance-the-philippine-mars-epic-journey-to-an-arizona-museum/ (stupid ai graphic)
  14. $50B annually in fraud is his claim Fifty Billion
  15. at this moment this is what dictator has pinned: +++ Post Conversation Pinned Elon Musk @elonmusk To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following: - Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible. - All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING! - The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily. The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE . It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already! Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious. When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!! This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately. 1:51 PM · Feb 8, 2025 · 43.3M Views
  16. i can't tell what's real anymore and what's farked googling musk the top tweet he has pinned at this moment sound so innocuous i'm posting it in the doge thread
  17. if you search to find the post on X & click through <mike lee> is commenting on a post by charlie cyclops kirk chewing his cud about unitary president shit; lee posts this is a coup of the judiciary; the dictator replies "yes"
  18. the us marshal service reports to the attorney general checkmate
  19. if that exchange is real his continued existence in foxworld is a flickering candle in the wind
  20. musk confirmed it's a judicial coup on x - check the coup thread bbc partners w/ cbs news who did a poll results below - cbs requires adblockers off so here is the bbc snippet Poll suggests Americans want Trump administration to focus on lowering pricespublished at 09:47 09:47 A new survey by the BBC’s US partner CBS and YouGov in the UK indicates that 77% of Americans think President Trump is doing what he promised in his election campaign. But one issue the poll focused on was 66% of those polled don’t think the administration is focussed enough on lowering prices – don’t forget that inflation was a key reason Trump won the election. Let’s take a look at other issues from the poll:, external Almost 60% were in favour of Trump's administration programme to deport immigrants illegally in the US, but 52% are opposed to using large detention centres to hold people while determining who should be deported Only 13% of those surveyed feel the US taking over Gaza would be a good idea, but the numbers are higher on Trump's handling of the Israel/Hamas war - 54% approve The survey asked about the amount of influence X owner Elon Musk should have over government operations and spending - 23% said a lot, with 31% saying none Meanwhile on tariffs, 56% approve of them from goods from China, 44% approve on Mexican imports, 40% think tariffs should be placed on goods from Europe and 38% think tarriifs should be placed imports from Canada CBS News says the survey was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 2,175 US adults interviewed between 5-7 February. Per CBS, the sample was weighted to be representative of adults nationwide according to gender, age, race, and education, according to the US Census.
  21. no msm response to this this morning that i can find it's been out there for 18 hours and is up to 28m views
×
×
  • Create New...