Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1756
  • Joined

Reputation

2380 Surly 10%

About scottsins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Just browse the headlines of all of the other articles on that site. It’s like gatewaypundit, but at a lower reading level.
  2. He ran for two TD’s last week and I’m not sure that it made much difference.
  3. “Make-a-wish kid dying of throwing shoulder cancer.”, for some reason has me LOL’ing HARD early on a Sunday.
  4. I’m not totally caught up in this thread, but did you ever reply to the 5+ specific queries about the statement by POTUS on F&F?
  5. I’m saying that if he did suck dicks, it was because he gave drugs/$ to the owners of said dicks. NOT, as is often stated that he sucked dicks in order to receive drugs.
  6. That’s a common misconception on this board. The actual story was that he picked up men at “flophouses” and used $/drugs to get them to “party” with him. Said partying was stated to include meth and sex.
  7. Such bullshit. Why was this “source’s” inability to recall the nature of their relationship, which is the basis for the retraction, NOT KNOWN when they first published the article?
  8. I explained it yesterday in reply to your post. It means that the government can not restrict speech (with some exceptions). Kirk’s 1st Amendment rights were not infringed this week.
  9. My issue with the Guardian article is that it’s contradicted by the family’s comments that the shooter was not at all “political” until after he came back from college.
  10. I read that and it’s hanging me up some now, and I don’t want to be. The bullet inscription “Fascist…catch!” is another factor that’s holding me back from jumping on the “groyper did it” train…and I REALLY WANT TO BE ON IT.
  11. My only question about the groyper theory is: How does that square with the comments from the family member, stating that the shooter discussed his dislike for Kirk because of his rhetoric spreading hate? Would that be consistent with the groyper criticisms of Kirk or nah?
  12. He had the right to free speech which actually means that the government didn’t stop him from saying whatever he wanted.
×
×
  • Create New...