Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1846
  • Joined

Reputation

2586 Surly 10%

About scottsins

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. What are you thinking as far as a target for pulling the trigger on a bounce if it occurs?
  2. The other issue is that if the ACA subsidies are taken up and even passed as a “clean” standalone measure, DOTARD can just veto it or threaten to veto it, which Johnson/Thune will use as cover.
  3. They won’t rule until next year though, right?
  4. Sir, this is the stonks thread. My answer to “why” is… we bought a stonk. Now I can have even more of the stonk for cheap.
  5. Anyone else considering DCA’s some more WWR? It’s around $1.28 this morning. My initial stuff cost me $1.72.
  6. It seemed to me like we called plays more aligned with 2h of Miss St game from the opening kickoff today. Much easier for Arch to make reads and decisions.
  7. Counterpoint: His putting stroke is just fucking awful.
  8. Isn’t it possible, given the language of the SENTENCE (stop calling it a story or article) that an NFL person reached out to Sexton to just see if there was any possibility of being open to further communications about a possible job opening? Sexton said “of course we aren’t saying 100% no at this time“. That scenario could be true and still account for the language used by the reporter. I only point this out because I keep seeing references to this whole shit just taking it as fact that SARK “put feelers out”, etc.
  9. Agree with your take on REE stuff. Another facet of this to me is that it’s also likely that China is working us over currently, promising/agreeing to some things which will be vague in nature, simply to postpone the 100% tariff threat. And then they will just revert back to REE fuckery, which is great for these investments. * MVST still making some nice gains and I’m holding my UUUU, which has been holding pretty steady through this recent general REE decline.
  10. When he says that he’s pissed about something being reported as if it’s factual, to me, it pretty obviously implies an assertion that it’s not factual. I know my take isn’t exciting at all but I guess I’m just a basic bitch sometimes.
  11. Yep. He used to enable rape by his team. Now he enables rape OF his team.
  12. I’m not optimistic. This isn’t new. He’s had a QB for 2.5 seasons now that clearly demonstrates greater effectiveness with the spread concept stuff.
  13. The actual “claim” in the “story” is that the reporter was told something. That can totally be true…WITHOUT that “something” being true.
  14. “Article” doing a lot of work in your posts. I’ve only seen the single-sentence tweet. Has Russini elaborated in other x posts or is there a fleshed out article published by The Atlantic on this?
  15. I need to see a better angle of that play. I couldn’t tell if it was double coverage or just Wingo’a guy leaving his assignment to break on that ball after it was thrown. I want to see where that second defender was and what they were doing right before the ball was thrown.
×
×
  • Create New...