Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1674
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. What’s the standard for shockingly well? I counted 3+ complete failures in ST. I guess that plus the blocked XP for a safety is supposed to impress me?
  2. I’ll answer that: The Maryland game, year 1, we fucked us the toss, but the ref asked further questions and explained some shit and bailed our player out of giving the ball away both halves. Know what that says about Herman? Fucking nothing, because HC’s don’t give special whiteboard scheming sessions to the coin toss calling player. And no, in no way am I saying that Herman is as bad or worse than Strong. Just give better examples. There are plenty.
  3. Wait. You’re contention is that we decided to run a play because we needed to eliminate the chance of a KO return for a TD? Take out the KU offense scoring on us scenario. That FG takes 4-5 seconds to be blown dead. Either KU fair catches the ensuing KO to run one Hail Mary/hook and lateral, or they try to return the KO 95+ yards to win the game. I can’t believe I’m actually explaining this.
  4. The only difference between this KU game and the one we lost is that we didn’t turn it over 6 times. Last night isn’t some evidence of improvement. Stop blaming Charlie’s recruits, seeing as how our best defensive tear was the won the the fewest TH signees. Would you like to discuss special teams and penalties? Where does that blame traditionally land. I think we have had 3-5 glaring, egregious and fundamentally flawed ST miscues this season. And fuck off with the injury excuses. Those weren’t good enough 6 years ago and they still aren’t. Our “B Team” (which this wasn’t) should never need a last second FG to come back and win against KU AT HOME. 24 points given up in the 4Q? Fuck that. Finally, you are so dismissive with the “sure he needs a better staff” comment. That’s a MAJOR FUCKING PROBLEM. Don’t make me remind you of Shawn Watson as an example of how a bad staff hire can ruin shit. * Be clear...TH has not even in the same discussion of shitty HC performance as what Strong was here. But “he’s better than Mack and Charlie” is so Fucking far from what our standard should be. Don’t be the chick who puts up with the serial cheating boyfriend, because “at least he doesn’t beat me like the last guy.”
  5. I believe that Twice is asserting (correctly, IMO), that THIS kind of “tough on crime” stance comes with a heavy dose of “pro-cop”.
  6. I haven’t read the whole thread, but THIS, especially given the fact that the call was placed to the NON-EMERGENCY number.
  7. Y’all posting up in an EMAW thread. Lulz.
  8. “Excoriated”...that’s a staff drafted tweet, 100%
  9. One time...Hillary gave Putin a “reset” button that was misspelled.
  10. Stole my post, verbatim. + Rep
  11. Those are federal charges so DOTUS does have pardon power, I think.
  12. If the state knew about drug dealing, regardless of convictions, that information would be turned over to the the defense under Brady/Giglio and the Morton Act. That said, the defense could have known and decided to just not use it. That’s highly likely, given what I know about this case, IMO.
  13. Sure. And then they can grandstand and fundraise based on defending Trump from persecution.
  14. NSIAP, but to me, the most striking thing about Pompeo’s comments is that he is explicitly describing and defending a “quid pro quo” discussion, which I’ve been told is NOT what this was.
  15. This is so ridiculous, because the justice reform credit IMMEDIATELY given in sincere way by Jones at the time is the ONE example that I point to to explain that the Clinton News Network doesn’t just rip Trump 100% of the time.
  16. You forgot “while citing zerohedge in a totally serious, non-ironic way.”
  17. This prank call story isn’t new and the stuff wasn’t just “dug up”. ETA: Also, the facts of what happened are totally benign.
  18. Double post.
  19. Can someone give the cliffs notes version of the basis of these “defamation” claims? I haven’t followed that particular part of this mess. That said, my hypothesis is that Schiff did NOT attribute false quotes/words to DOTUS. I would presume that Schiff was speaking about what logical inferences could be drawn from the call memo, etc., which is, of course not at all the same thing as “making up words and pretending that I said them when I didn’t”. How close am I?
  20. Sure, but the assertion you are denying came from zerohedge, which is the gold standard in credibility.
  21. What a vague worthless question to ask.
  22. You keep talking about the political pressure and how it *could* cause a significant GOP exodus. What I’m missing from your posts is the factual basis for believing that the GOP voters give a single solitary fuck about oaths, laws, ethics, fraud, etc.
  23. Wait. Your last paragraph, was that meant for me? The fuck? Where is my whataboutism in my post. I was telling the troll that there is an actual transcript, so lack of a recording does not necessitate relying on the bullshit memorandum.
  24. Still catching up with your nonsense. I’ll stop after this. You actually make a correct assertion! There is no “recording”. There IS, however, an actual transcript of the call. It’s locked in some super secret server, and STILL has not been released by the WH.
  25. Negged for either being too stupid to know what a simple word means or deliberate obfuscation. You pick. TRANSCRIPT.
×
×
  • Create New...