Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1670
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. Wait. In this, the AOC thread, you make a post that consists of zero content other than a tweet about someone else getting a divorce? Ok. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. Yes, because currently, you can meme your way into office at any level.
  3. Did that article mention ANYTHING that could be construed as some basis for calling Cummings a racist? I didn’t see it, but I must be wrong because if I’m right, that would mean that EMAW made some bullshit non-responsive troll post that added nothing to the discussion. Surely that can’t be the case.
  4. Wait. Next you’re going to tell me that Donald Sterling was racist too?!?!
  5. Lol. In this city, the answer is always “wrecking ball”.
  6. Yeah, the lifting of the zoning restriction of a maximum (3?) stories for buildings in WC, just ruined that shit beyond recognition.
  7. Really? The ENTIRE dossier was PROVEN false? I’m going to need a link or a cite for that.
  8. I’ll always remember that place as “Pronto Market”.
  9. I didn’t read the entire lawsuit, but were the words “because he’s under audit” ever used? I didn’t see them.
  10. Just buy ghee. Doesn’t have to be refrigerated, lasts forever at room temp after opening, AND it doesn’t burn as easy, because it’s clarified.
  11. John Brotherton says you are wrong, but it’s ok. Sammiches defy rules.
  12. Best use I’ve found for “lean brisket”. I believe the cheese blend here is a little white cheddar, some Muenster and Gruyere.
  13. They aren’t closing because of a lack of customers/sales.
  14. “Want” is the wrong verb completely. The man has zero feels about any of this. He will, much to the chagrin of lots of people, rely on the DOJ memo and refuse to answer questions outside of that scope. He will tell Congress that until they go get a controverting judicial opinion, he will take his guidance from the DOJ opinion/assertion. Then, like with everything else, the house/Pelosi will say “aw shucks...contempt of Congress and stuff”...and then go away to see what their next “big play” is.
  15. The scene when Markiese just buckled at the knees TWICE for no reason...with JB saying, as it’s happening, “you hurt?”, as he nudged him back out on the field, was fucking gross.
  16. Reading that makes me livid, because his conclusions, if believed, necessitate impeachment, and that’s going nowhere.
  17. My best guess is that Trump knows that Lieu will eviscerate him on Twitter. His social media flame game is top level.
  18. I mean, RR and CP did vote Democrat (I think) in 2016 and 2018 so there’s that. I guess Georgetown skewed the WillCo Numbers?
  19. Telling people from America to go back to a country that they aren’t actually from is a statement that non-Anglo Americans are somehow lesser. It’s a denial that they are actually “from here” because their ancestry goes back to brown parts of the world. White supremacists and skinheads OFTEN tell Black Americans to “go back to Africa”, and it’s racist AF.
  20. I included a few other political ones besides the Trump stuff.
  21. The crisis referred to now is NOT about some large scale invasion coming. That was bullshit. The crisis being recognized by the left is the current humanitarian shitfest. Bonus points: Manufactured, when used to refer to the current situation = caused by the orange mushroom dicked DOTUS.
  22. Cool, but I guess you aren’t old enough to understand what the “manufactured” verbiage was referring to, because it sure as shit isn’t what you think it is.
  23. They have settled the issue of defining “persons”, Constitutionally, when addressing 14th Amendment cases, which involve guarantees of DP for “persons”. So now you want them to reverse themselves on an interpretation of the simple word, persons? Just amend the constitution and you can have what you want.
  24. This. PM me he info if you like and I’ll dig around to see if o can find something that will help your situation. I’m at the Bell Co. courthouse every day doing lawyer stuff so it’s no big deal to me. First thing is to verify that she is even who she says, what her criminal history is, how things are going with the pending DWI, if she is on the special “rocket docket” which is highly monitored, etc. I won’t go into anymore detail outside of PM, but there’s a decent chance we can ruin her efforts without breaking any laws, bar rules, etc. ETA: I should have noted that the FIRST thing that I would do would be verify that this woman is NOT one of my clients. The info you’ve given doesn’t seem to check the boxes for any of my clients though.
×
×
  • Create New...