Jump to content

scottsins

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    1765
  • Joined

Everything posted by scottsins

  1. That’s not how any of this works.
  2. For anyone who cancelled their Disney products, I do have one extra for Saturday that I can give someone at zero cost. Maybe just buy the first round of beers?
  3. I guess mine isn’t like the ones you know because he sure as fuck doesn’t have an iPad to cuddle up and watch shit on yet. Plenty of time for him to go into the personal screen abyss later. ETA: Obviously, there is still good info in your suggestion. I would just run the stuff on the TV’s in the home instead of a personal device that he holds.
  4. What is the best, smoothest, user friendly way to watch Disney programming without them benefiting from me financially? I have the bundle, so I know that first, I need to switch from Hulu Live to YouTube TV for most regular programming stuff. I have a 2 year old and bluey/Mickey Mouse Club are a big deal for him. He will/would totally understand at a later time, but for now it would suck. ETA: “Cars”. Holy shit that’s his favorite thing ever.
  5. To be fair, the CBS thing was but different. It wasn’t that he said Trump raped someone. He said that Trump was “convicted of rape”, when those actual counts were acquittals. It’s not much of a difference but the verbiage used made it a specific statement made that was not true. That said, a retraction should have been enough and settling wasn’t necessarily the only option since, IMO, the malice requirement and damages issues were still ripe for a fight.
  6. Joe Burrow catching strays? Wtf?
  7. I can think of two for sure without trying.
  8. Just browse the headlines of all of the other articles on that site. It’s like gatewaypundit, but at a lower reading level.
  9. He ran for two TD’s last week and I’m not sure that it made much difference.
  10. “Make-a-wish kid dying of throwing shoulder cancer.”, for some reason has me LOL’ing HARD early on a Sunday.
  11. I’m not totally caught up in this thread, but did you ever reply to the 5+ specific queries about the statement by POTUS on F&F?
  12. I’m saying that if he did suck dicks, it was because he gave drugs/$ to the owners of said dicks. NOT, as is often stated that he sucked dicks in order to receive drugs.
  13. That’s a common misconception on this board. The actual story was that he picked up men at “flophouses” and used $/drugs to get them to “party” with him. Said partying was stated to include meth and sex.
  14. Such bullshit. Why was this “source’s” inability to recall the nature of their relationship, which is the basis for the retraction, NOT KNOWN when they first published the article?
  15. I explained it yesterday in reply to your post. It means that the government can not restrict speech (with some exceptions). Kirk’s 1st Amendment rights were not infringed this week.
  16. My issue with the Guardian article is that it’s contradicted by the family’s comments that the shooter was not at all “political” until after he came back from college.
  17. I read that and it’s hanging me up some now, and I don’t want to be. The bullet inscription “Fascist…catch!” is another factor that’s holding me back from jumping on the “groyper did it” train…and I REALLY WANT TO BE ON IT.
  18. My only question about the groyper theory is: How does that square with the comments from the family member, stating that the shooter discussed his dislike for Kirk because of his rhetoric spreading hate? Would that be consistent with the groyper criticisms of Kirk or nah?
  19. He had the right to free speech which actually means that the government didn’t stop him from saying whatever he wanted.
  20. I love that the second poster’s handle is “GeauxBurrow”. Joe Burrow is NOT one of them at all.
×
×
  • Create New...