-
Posts
2,236 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Reynolds Woodcock
-
-
Fuck Kevin Mar
- 5
- 3
-
Didn't you notice on the plane when you started talking, eventually I started reading the vomit bag?!
-
1 hour ago, Hmbre97 said:
This thread has been
Derka'dWang'dWhat shit poster is he a reincarnation of?
- 1
-
37 minutes ago, Elmer_Fudd said:
Saw that a 4+ hour directors cut will be released at a later date (Apple+/blu ray).
Ridley continues to be the king of directors cuts. The theatrical Kingdom of Heaven is garbage. The directors cut is awesome.
- 3
- 1
-
Has anyone talked about how KSU is clearly under ranked by 4 spots? They lost at #7, #9 and #20, with the first being a walk off 61 yard field goal, the second being in overtime and the third being by one touchdown. They should be right behind LSU as the second highest ranked 3 loss team.
I still can’t believe we pulled that game out with Murphy at quarterback.
- 1
-
Everyone on the panel but Galloway plugged Texas as a sure thing in the chaos scenario/if it comes down to Texas and Bama. I don’t think the committee is impervious to that kind of noise. Take care of business and root for Florida, Louisville, OSU, Washington State and Bama.
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:
The football board serves it's purpose, which is to act as a magnet to keep the fucking idiots away from here, sir.
And the recruiting board serves its purpose, which is to act as a Facebook page for all the GenX/Boomer posters.
- 3
- 1
-
1 hour ago, UncleSonny said:
In this scenario, don’t all 3 of Texas, Oregon, and Bama make it? With the Michigan/OSU winner as the 1 seed.
Oops, I meant if FSU wins out.
-
20 minutes ago, fellside said:
I think there are only 4 scenarios where we get in
1. Both Washington and Oregon lose this week to their in state rivals.
2. One of Washington or Oregon lose this week and then follows that up by winning the Pac 12.
3. The winner of Ohio State/Michigan loses to Iowa.
4. Florida State loses to either Florida or Louisville.
(4) is the only one that I think is going to happen, so I'm rooting hard for it. The SEC champ is getting in no matter what; there's no sense spending time arguing about it. It makes you look naive to spend time suggesting they would leave them out.
I'm maybe slightly worried that (4) happens, Georgia loses, and the committee takes Georgia instead of Texas. But it's not a real worry. The only way I can see that happening is if our wins over Tech and the Big 12 runner up look like the TCU type win where no one thinks we look impressive. And honestly, if play like that, a lot of us deep down won't think we're better than Georgia either.
I think there is a real chance (maybe not >50%, but real), that if FSU loses, Bama wins out and Oregon wins out, Texas and Bama both make it in over Oregon. Yes it would require the committee to reverse Texas and Oregon even though Oregon’s most impressive two wins would have come in the final two weeks. But, if we beat Tech more handily than Oregon and Bama shows they can beat Georgia, that might be enough for the committee to latch onto.
-
-
8 minutes ago, Mitch Cumsteen said:
If they put a one loss bama in over us then we should cancel the Michigan game next year and schedule incarnate word, because what's the point of even having that big intersectional game?
I don’t agree with this as a fan, because I love watching those games, but I do agree that Sark should be on all the tv shows running with that line between the big 12 championship game and final selection. What’s the point of scheduling big time road OOC games if you don’t get a real benefit in winning?
- 1
-
We should all be tickled fucking pink if those rubes pay a hundred million to Dabo. Jimbo circa 2017 all over again.
- 2
- 1
-
4 hours ago, GreenspointTexas said:
Yup, there are basically 3 tiers:
1) Blue Bloods (8 schools) - perennial contenders
2) Half bloods (about 16 schools) - have a fantastic year once every 5-10 years, maybe contend every once in a while
3) everyone else
aggie falls into #2 only because of their location, money, and rabid fanbase. Their history is shit and their tradition has become an albatross around their neck
I mean, if you want to consider us a blue blood, I probably wouldn’t use “perennial contender” as your metric, homie
- 2
-
1 hour ago, bwub60 said:
I got banned from IT from making fun of Wells.
Pour one out for Wells. If Traylor goes to aggy, #beasttexas might be tough sledding for a season or two.
- 1
-
20 minutes ago, MonkeyDoughnut said:
Really wondering how the recruiting dynamic changes with either an Elko or Traylor hire. With how they are paying off Jimbo via the athletic fund it seen clear there was already some in-fighting going on and the high level donors aren't pulling in the same direction.. All I've heard on the Elko/Traylor debate is that it's heated and split.
Maybe the going rate for defensive tackles will be reset since one coach won’t be trying to build a roster for an 11-0 defense.
-
I’d like to see Blue get more run, but long term I think Baxter will be really good. He’s so young and has been dinged up all year long. I bet he’ll be a much more powerful runner over the next 2 years
- 3
-
38 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:
You and I have a very similar list.
1. Social Network (Best Movie of the 2010s)
2. Zodiac
3. Se7en
4. Dragon Tattoo (this movie fucking rips)
5. Fight Club
6. The Killer
7. Gone Girl
8. The Game
9. Button
10. Panic
11. Mank
12. Alien
Shit, I forgot about Mank! I actually liked that movie. I might rank it above Button, but that movie just didn’t really work for me.
-
1. Zodiac
2. Social Network
3. Se7en*
4. Fight Club*
5. The Killer
6. Gone Girl
7. The Game
8. Dragon Tattoo
9. Button
10. Panic Room
11. Alien 3
*I watched these movies when I was like 12 years a few years after they came out, and they blew my 12 year old mind. If they came out now, they might be lower, but fuck it.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
6 minutes ago, The Ace of Aces said:Coach’s disdain for Anwar is palatable.
- 2
- 1
- 15
-
@bizzle happy for you, brother.
- 1
- 6
-
1 hour ago, Ashylarry said:
Can we have some of their recruits + Evan Stewart?
I am speaking Bryce Anderson into existence.
- 1
-
38 minutes ago, Fico said:
Offense:
LT - Soph
LG - Soph
RG - Soph
QB - Rs. Soph…. Unique too with limited amount of experience (graduated early, wasted/lost year at OSU)
RB - Soph/Fr.
We have more upper class men on defense but we are thin. Safety has upper class men but is weak spot with depth.
LB is Ford…. And freshman Hill… everyone else is a jag/scrub
CB/NB is solid, DT/DL is solid.
Hayden Connor is a junior bruh. And if you want to play games to classify two guys who will be in the pros next year in Ewers and Brooks as underclass to make yourself feel better, have at it. But this is not a young team by college football standards. We are experienced and talented (which is why we’re 9-1).
- 2
-
3 hours ago, Fico said:
Or maybe… hear me out… a lot of the most talented players on our team are young. They are really talented but they tend to do dumb shit and, like young players do, they fuck up more than they “should.” We like, most young teams, play up and down to levels of competition.
Except that isn’t true. On offense, 9 out of 11 starters are at least third year players. Depends on the formation but defense is also 8 or 9 of 11 starters being at least third year players. We have some talented younger guys getting meaningful snaps, but the young team excuse doesn’t fly this year.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- 3
- 11
Texas vs tceh - 6:30pm on ABC
in Football
Posted
These MFs came to play tonight