Jump to content

TexasEd

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    5085
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by TexasEd

  1. Well there is a good chance most of those posters attended before A&M admitted women and they miss the old days of all male grab ass parties and sheep shaggin. Who am I kidding, they still have those.
  2. It is still not up to a defendant or a judge to determine that but the ORCON. In addition, the things that he reportedly took or that have been speculated on are not up for debate like how we would approach an attack on Iran's nuclear research facility, the operational capabilities of our nuclear submarines, lists of foreign intelligence sources/operatives, the extent that we know individuals in the US are compromised by the Russians, the details or sources on Mohammed bin Salman. All of these are at the highest level.
  3. Says who? The Classification is what it is and is governed by the Original Classification Authority. I know this stuff because it was my job to know it for over 20 years. A defendant, even an ex-politician does not have any say over the "defense information classification of the documents". None. It is a fact before the court that they are classified. Not up for debate. Even if copies were leaked to the press or reports of their contents were made public they would still be classified. The only thing anyone that was ever read into the programs could say is "I can neither confirm or deny those reports." Edit: Here is a training course on it https://www.cdse.edu/Portals/124/Documents/student-guides/IF102-guide.pdf?ver=vxs2_YJrkUKDbIexMvvMcw%3D%3D#:~:text=OCA rollover%3A Original Classification Authority,information in the first instance.
  4. But what he is charged with is stealing stuff. Very dangerous information. That is the crime. Cannon is arguing that the Government has to give this dangerous information back to the thief. How can any sane person argue in good faith that a thief needs the fruits of the crime as a defense? The fact that his arguments admit having the materials is admission of the crime since it means 1) they admit he took it 2) that he refused to return it. Jack Smith should ask for directed verdict based on the information in the Trump arguments.
  5. The problem is that Trump won the Electoral College in 2016. He did not win a plurality of the popular vote. Hillary Clinton did. In 2020 Joe Biden won an outright majority in the popular vote. So: 2016 Trump won EC Majority and Clinton won Popular vote plurality 2020 Biden won both EC and PV majority Trump never won a plurality of anything unless you're talking about the Republican primary
  6. Staying in a shelter on the Appalachian Trail can be like that. They are everywhere.
  7. I’m not the only person hearing asshole whistle guy, right?
  8. Slow developing play and wrong back in the game.
  9. and the Russians own the NRA
  10. I considered spoilering this but here he is in his gym
  11. Some new ones lately and some oldies Genetically modified marijuana ADHD medicine Vaccines Video games and other incel behavior lack of God in school The Border! What about Chicago? pick your favorite Dem District Attorney wind turbines lithium batteries TicTok It's definitely not the guns, the romanticizing of guns, examples like Proud Boys cosplaying militia and storming the Capitol and worshiping incels like Kyle Rittenhouse for shooting people
  12. What's long and hard and full of seamen? Oh, and this has been discussed in the two Dotard threads.
×
×
  • Create New...