Jump to content

Fud

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    9767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fud

  1. I keep seeing this stat.. nine yards rushing includes a 30 yard subtraction from three sacks. Their true ball carriers had 39 yards on 19 carriers for 2.05 yards per carry, which while terrible for that rushing attack, is abundantly better than 0.4 yards per carry
  2. Luckily, Nansen has seen a lot of Stanford in his college career
  3. He posts a ton, so I'd rather not go through and copy all of his posts Here's one "Last night, Michigan ran 17 zone scheme run plays to 15 gap scheme run plays. If you look at last year, they did the same thing week 1 against ECU. In that game they were 19 zone and 11 gap. In every other game that season, they were more gap than zone except Iowa,. In fact, they finished the year with 301 gap scheme runs to 187 zone. We didn't get a ton of vertical movement from my 1st watch recollection on zone runs. I'll be interested to see if we start to migrate to more gap (pin & pull, counter, duo, power)." He also thinks the touchdown they gave up was because Wink did a cover zero blitz like he was in the NFL and Fresno was ready for it
  4. If you're on On3, there's a good poster on their Michigan site who knows his stuff (MrSharkFB) if you're desperate for moar Michigan takes
  5. You treat him like he's prime Gronk and try to knock the shit out of him on early downs when he's in-line (with a DB having eyes on him flat footed before committing to the run), get into his body on early downs when he's flexed out (again with a DB with eyes on him) and attempt to disrupt his timing, and bracket him on obvious passing plays, and mix in some other stuff throughout the game to make it tougher for them to adjust to Over-allocate towards him while staying honest to the run, and under-allocate to their WRs
  6. @blacklab are you able to move this to the football board since the OP hasn't yet?
  7. For a guy who's currently projected to go in the top five, Graham doesn't seem like an especially freaky athlete. He's more of a technique, strength, motor, and nastiness guy than the elite Bama/Georgia IDL types we've seen
  8. The also lost Junior Colston and Kris Jenkins Colston and Sainristil were dudes
  9. With the caveat that it's based only on the Fresno State game (they could be holding stuff back, weren't fully engaged, yada yada), Michigan doesn't just have a QB problem Their WRs might be below average Big XII level. Their small fast guy isn't particular explosive for that archetype. Their "X" looks like a Garrett Gray. Their 3rd WR when in 11 is just fine, but they prefer to stay in 12 Their FB/HB isn't as good as I'd expected. We've seen better on an annual basis at KSU Michigan has had arguably the best OL in the country for each of the last three years. This OL is much closer to average P4 Their TE could be playing for an NFL team this Sunday. They're supposed to have a good second TE (#17) but I haven't seen him. Maybe he was held back?
  10. Actually changing up coverages more than a handful of times a game like we saw against CSU should make you feel better about this
  11. Different looks in a creative run game
  12. Kamari Lassiter is +6600 to win defensive rookie of the year. Just saying
  13. Line was sitting at -6.5 across the board, and it's now -7 or -7.5
  14. I think Johnson is like Stingley Jr in that you can get him from time to time, but he's a ballhawk who's a threat for a pick any time you target him
  15. Per Cover 3, Michigan receivers had 7 targets for 19 yards.
  16. Going back and watching the Michigan game closer, and a couple of first half thoughts.. - their DT duo destroys worlds, and when the first team is in, the DL as a whole immediately move the LOS back two yards at the snap. The rest of the defense outside of CB1 (who might be a Stingley Jr clone) is just fine; just run clear-out routes sacrificial routes with whoever he's covering. It seems like a lot of Fresno's offensive success is when one or both of the DTs are subbed out. Similar to Georgia, they have some sick simulated pressures that college offenses can't handle - this isn't the same Michigan OL. They had a lot of issues against Fresno State - they don't have a QB. They don't have WRs. I'm not sure if they even have a good RB, despite Edwards having a big name. They do have TEs. They should really consider basing out of two TE, one FB, and Orgi, and just daring you to load the box to stop the run. I don't think Sherrone has that in him though. Harbaugh might have done it though
  17. Just watched Oddity, it's really good. Adding it to all future horror rec lists
  18. Temple has four turnovers, all giving OU a short field The OU defense looks good, but Temple's QB is a joke
  19. According to what?
  20. Burks is a stud, Farooq is fine (although he seems to have left the game), and the TE is solid. Brenen and Hester suck. Not sure why OU is letting Arnold get hit this game Their OL looks the worst that I can remember
  21. Not yet That's one of a few that I'm extremely excited for coming up though (Terrifier 3, Oddity, Trap)
  22. KC, Buffalo, and Baltimore are also dealing with a first place schedule
  23. That game will be a cock fight
×
×
  • Create New...