Jump to content

Fud

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    8887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Fud

  1. Gerry- “I'll add that Connor Weigman got more reps in practice so far this week too. But I expect Max Johnson to take the ball first Saturday.”
  2. Joe Brady gave the play to the old fart who then relayed it to the offense, imo
  3. When people were reporting that Card was the likely starter, here was his initial post "Card did get most of the first team reps today, which is new. That's probably the root of the rumor. It doesn't mean Card is going to be named the starter. The second scrimmage looms large." Then on the Friday before the second scrimmage, he broke that Ewers was getting the majority of the first team reps before Ewers was announced the starter later in the day. Ewers getting the first team reps wasn't anywhere else at that point "Ewers got more of the 1st team reps today than Card. But he wasn't very sharp. Threw a lot of picks downfield into double coverage. Kid needs to start processing what he's seeing better." "And I just heard that Ewers did indeed get more of the 1st team reps today. But he threw a lot of picks into coverage downfield."
  4. Probably Haynes King, Max Johnson, or Conner Weigman
  5. Someone on IT is saying that "all three QBs got equal reps today"
  6. He's consistently broken team news before it's hit the public domain for going on two years that's almost always ended up being accurate. You have Hall and some other injury that you can't come up with.
  7. What was he wrong about other than Hall being off the team, which might have actually been right in real time? As far as recent stuff goes, he said early on that Neyor tore his ACL, and then sites reported everything from his knee being fine to it not being a knee injury
  8. This not being one of Saban's best teams means that it's probably the second best team in the country, and at worst third
  9. Against Houston, UTSA was mostly sitting in a two-deep shell and asking Houston to run on a light box Against Army, UTSA had nine in the box in cover zero
  10. I'm merely saying I don't think using raw passing stats from the Army game is terribly useful here when considering Army's offense Regarding Houston's offense sucking, I think it's too early to tell
  11. I wouldn't assume UTSA's secondary sucks because of the raw yardage they gave up against Army. That offense is a whole different animal and DBs end up getting lost in play-action conflict after selling out on the run that they won't necessarily see against other offense. They gave up only 6.4 YPA vs Houston.
  12. Fwiw, SP+ doesn't take injuries into consideration, while books do
  13. Gerry- “If anyone sees Chris Marshall... tell him to report back to the Aggie football office.”
  14. If they're warming up on Saturday with #75 at LT and #64 at RT, then it would appear that their guys are still out Oh, and in before "it don't make a shit"
  15. I spent some time trying to figure out what's going on with their OL. Traylor mentions that guys are injured, but typically doesn't give much of a timeline, except for their starting RT #77 being out for a long time - Presumed starting LT #73 (Allen) hasn't played yet this season due to "off the field situations", and Traylor said today that he hopes he can return this week, and is unsure about how game-ready he'll be. He wasn't suited up for the first two games - Returning starting RT #77 (Hart) got injured in game one, and is "out for awhile" - Grad transfer OT from Northwestern #74 (He'Bert) who was competing to start at LT/RT got injured at some point in fall camp and hasn't returned. Traylor didn't mention him today and hasn't given any sort of timeline - Incoming JUCO OG #75 (Tatafu) moved to LT after whatever happened off the field with #73 and after #74 got injured in camp, and has started both games at LT. He's healthy as far as I can tell - #64 (Almaraz) was in the competition early for LT but was eventually moved to RT; he's been battling an injury since camp. #68 (Martinez) is a former walk-on who was previously an IOL. After #77 went down in the first quarter of game one, #64 replaced him in the first half but couldn't continue on for the second half, and so #68 took over. In game two vs Army, #64 started but went down in the 2nd quarter and was again replaced by #68. His status for Texas is unclear. So while they've had four tackles out, they've had the same starting four at LT-LG-C-RG, but have had to scramble at RT while starting an athletic former OG at LT.
  16. Kind of cool that all power five are represented
  17. SP+ update has Texas at #16, at at #7 on offense and #40 on defense Preseason: 22, 8, 51 Post Week 1: 18, 8, 47 Post Week 2: 16, 7, 40
  18. Getting sacked can easily be due to not processing fast enough or not getting rid of the ball to avoid a sack than being immobile
  19. League average would be an upgrade
  20. I don't think Johnson is immobile. He's a pretty good athlete, just not as fast as King. He might be a more functional all around runner than King since he can run inside without the fear of dying at first contact. King's dad might have been a factor, but I think King being in the system for 2.5 years vs 0.5 for Johnson was a lot of it
  21. They win a lot of games they otherwise shouldn’t because the DL is consistently really good. It covers up warts.
  22. I thought the Henson one was more ridiculous. They convinced themselves that he was the issue last year, but forgot about the success from the year prior
×
×
  • Create New...