Jump to content

Rickylovesweed

Full Members
  • Posts

    11208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Rickylovesweed

  1. Posted this in the basketball forum but Aidoo is getting On3 predictions to Arkansas. It seems very unlikely that Aidoo and Garrison would both end up at Arkansas.
  2. Aidoo is getting On3 predictions to Arkansas. It seems very unlikely Garrison and Aidoo both end up at Arkansas.
  3. It seems pretty obvious we are about to play much faster next year with all these long/athletic guards and wings.
  4. I'm not even sure Oldacre will be the 2nd option at the 5 if we add Barker. Barker will be the starting 5 IMO. She can also play the 4 but she's a really good option at the 5 in a full-court press system.
  5. I think the big thing with Oldacre is she has potential and only played 16 minutes a game at Miami. Plus, she's upgrading programs. This is the type of player you can convince to be an 8 to 15 minute role player next season.
  6. Yeah, I think that was always the biggest issue at Texas. Can you convince somebody like Muhammad to be the 3rd option at PF and essentially the 4th to 6th "big" on the roster? It's a tough sell.
  7. Weird decision. Oregon has some major turmoil and have missed the tournament the last 2 years. Muhammad must want a guaranteed starting spot.
  8. Makes sense to me if we add one of Gardiner or Barker. No other legit big would be willing to come here if we add one of those players.
  9. Beers also seems like a really weird fit at OU. Baranczyk runs most of her offense on the perimeter with bigs running a lot of high-screen action. Beers lives in the paint and that's not really her game. I'm sure with her talent you can make it work though. Still a very weird fit IMO.
  10. Cameron Williams also seems like an ideal 2nd big to add. She's good but also wasn't a full-time starter at Michigan so maybe she would be cool in a more limited role at Texas. It's going to be difficult to convince somebody to come here in a frontcourt including Jones, Moore, Carlton, and potentially 1 of Gardiner and Barker.
  11. Gardiner and Barker are the best 2 bigs available. I think Gardiner is better but Barker is the better fit in Vic's system.
  12. The vibe I get with the AF kid is he's ours if we want him. I think it's more our decision than anything.
  13. Rowing could be pretty important. Stanford is ranked #1 and we are ranked #2. That's a 20 point swing if we can flip those results.
  14. Nothing you said is wrong but I don't take these "do no contact" listings seriously. The women's team just landed a big transfer (Phelia) who was listed as "DNC" until Texas convinced her to visit. Teams are definitely reaching out to transfers via 3rd parties even under "DNC."
  15. This should be a big we are after if Garrison isn't in the boat.
  16. This is another big we should be after if we don't land Garrison.
  17. I think this is the biggest issue with Beers and Jones together. They're both low-post players who live in the paint. Purely based on fit, Baker seems more ideal because she's a more athletic mold.
  18. Not sure which is better for us because if UCONN adds Beers they are a legit title contender. Texas, UCONN, and South Carolina would all be loaded.
  19. We are all guessing here but I don't agree with this starting backcourt. Larry is the best perimeter defender and playmaker/creator on the team. I think he's definitely going to start at PG.
  20. Hunter keeps lucking into some incredible situations. He's once again going to be surrounded by two very good college guards in Haggerty and Rogers. I'm not even sure Hunter will start.
  21. Yup. Vonleh was a 1st team All Pac 12 player and she might be the 5th or 6th best big in the portal. The more you look at who is in the portal we needed attrition. You have to upgrade when there are this many quality players available.
  22. Mark is probably the top transfer we've added. PG: Larry SG: Mark SF: Johnson That's my guess. Then Weaver and Pope off the bench.
×
×
  • Create New...