Jump to content

henrygandorf

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    19847
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by henrygandorf

  1. i've been out of town for 5 days. did i miss anything?
  2. trump doesn't like it when people talk shit about him. trump really really really doesn't like it when people who actually know him talk shit about him.
  3. a black woman falling from the sky sounds dangerous to the gop.
  4. i thought we decided on mel gibson.
  5. is it hell week? we're on the road and we're not facing 100 loss teams. sounds like easy-peezy-lemon-squeezy.
  6. the netflix marketing model is strange but effective. they don't believe in advertising a movie/show until you can actually click "watch now". that's why stuff seems to appear out of nowhere. other streaming services are beginning to adopt the same ideas. my buddy at nbcu said that peacock is doing it now too. they won't spend a dollar marketing a show until you can click to watch that same day. basically they don't believe in the attention span of people at all. if they advertise something a week in advance, they'll have forgotten and moved on by the time it's out. it's sad, but probably true.
  7. i believe they come out this week. he's also doing rats, poison, and the ratcatcher. one is animated. https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/wes-anderson-netflix-short-films
  8. that's 18 weeks - one night a week, for 2 networks. broadcast networks are struggling to fill those slots and would still be even with football on 2-3 nights. have you seen what thursday night looks like on nbc the past couple years? 40 years of the best comedies of all time, and now it's law and order shows for 3 hours. another night is all shows based in chicago (chicago fire, etc). cbs is all procedural spinoffs. abc seems like mostly reality (idol, dwts, bachelor). sunday night on fox has animation, which is not affected by the strike. each network has ~one night with any type of comedy. pickings are slim for quality content.
  9. there were some problematic elements, but this wasn't really one of them.
  10. good. i hope every poll has trump up 10. this is no time for complacency. stay angry.
  11. we’ll be better next year. addition by subtraction.
  12. hearing it 3 days in a row makes me less comfortable.
  13. maybe this isn’t the best time to catch up on the last page or so…
  14. they really weren’t all that great.
  15. if brantley is banged up, i don't know why anyone would be surprised. this is exactly what i would've predicted for a framber start.
  16. i said a direct comparison. he'll look like the president when compared to anyone the right would be putting up. also a 6 point win in the general is a 9mm+ vote victory. not sure what wiping the floor is, but we're approaching that territory. the electoral count wasn't particularly close either (it's a blowout if you ask trump). biden should win by 10-12mm in the popular vote next year.
  17. fox news makes it tough for anyone from ca to win nationally. i think the rust belt is the key to the electoral math, as biden has shown. i would lean towards josh shapiro instead. not sure who are considered the top women right now - maybe whitmer, who's also from that region which is good. do we have a thread about the dem bench? i feel like that's probably a job for @Js1
  18. i hope you're right. i want to believe. the question will always be "can he get black people to vote for him and support him" and i don't know the answer to that. his polling from 2020 doesn't really mean shit 8 years later, but people will insist that it does. i wouldn't really worry about him in a general, as he'll wipe the floor with anyone from the right in a direct comparison. it's whether he can get through the primaries.
  19. people who like trump are afraid of smart people. it would be a frustrating mess.
  20. getting them in front of microphones wasn't the problem (though never by subpoena, god no). i saw clowns like navarro get interviewed plenty of times, and all they would do was ignore the question and filibuster with their nonsensical talking points. but to be fair, when you're not qualified for the job you've been appointed to and have no background or basis in it, it doesn't really matter if you stay on topic or not. back to pete for a brief moment - i still find it amusing that the gop either (a) thinks he's not qualified for this job or (b) is somehow taking advantage of all the perks. yes, i know they try to take cheap shots at anyone who poses a threat, and pete definitely does that. but to think a guy like this is not qualified is laughable. even if he wasn't at all when appointed, it would take him a long weekend to get up to speed. i saw him twice in person back in 2020, and he used to take 10-15 min at the end of each speech and open the floor to questions about literally anything - sometimes not even campaign related. people asked him really random shit and got real in the weeds with the history and nuance of thousand year old conflicts in the middle east and how it affects blah blah with the economy in india and the blah blah in russia and he would go off like he was a professor in whatever subject the question was. and then he would pivot to something about art or music or poetry. it was pretty remarkable. sadly, he's probably wasted in govt and it sucks he'll never have a real shot at the big chair.
  21. i don't know anything about burchett, but i will give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume the mention of "gotcha" question comment was to placate the morons on his team. i think he's actually curious and cares about the content of the questions he asked, and barring availability, i would be pretty surprised if pete didn't handle this personally. maybe not face to face, but pete will follow through on it, and probably fulfill a low-end congressman's expectations x10. imagine a cabinet member from trump's term actually answering a question like that. i can't.
  22. you're confusing the playoff number with the division number. pretty sure my summary is correct here. and i only notched the division down one number with a win tomorrow, from 10 to 9. toronto lost and i believe we now have identical records, which means toronto is also 0.5 up on both texas and seattle and they go to tampa this weekend, who trails balt by 1.5 after balt lost to cleveland. the schedule makers earned their $ this year.
  23. ok, so captain obvious here, but tomorrow is the biggest game of the season. let's discuss. the magic number for playoffs is 6, division is 10. i know toronto is losing 3-0 in the 6th, but let's ignore that for now. seattle and texas play each other. so if we can just fucking win the game tomorrow, we will be half a game up on someone and 1.5 up on the other. the playoff magic number will go to 4 (right?) and the division magic number will go to 9. a playoff magic number of 4 with 8 to play sounds manageable, even for this bunch. if we lose, we're in 2nd place.
×
×
  • Create New...