Jump to content

Horn of Gabriel

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    1041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Horn of Gabriel

  1. 3 hours ago, FartingDreamer said:

    I disagree, we need less subjectivity and more objective, hard, data to distinguish the deserving teams.  That is one thing the BCS did well and combined with a playoff, would create an awesome format where everything is decided on the field.  

    Fuck this line of thinking and fuck the BCS.  The data you're talking about doesn't exist.  This isn't MLB where everyone plays everyone.  The data points in college football are too limited.  Any model you build around those limited datapoints is rife with expansive fuckery, which is why we had 7 different computer models all disagreeing with each other in the BCS days.  Those data models and the inputs they weigh are built by humans who are...BIASED.  You can't tell me that the subjectivity inherent in those models is any different than the subjectivity in a committee because it's not.  It's just dressed up fancier with the veneer of "data" to make people think it's less subjective.  It ain't.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  2. 4 minutes ago, Make em eat Taco Bell said:

    great breakdown.   Alamo looks very likely and I'm guessing we get UCLA which would be a high level shootout since they have a mediocre defense, unless Ewers misses passes and the WRs drop everything - and of course Bijan won't be there so let's give J. Brooks the rock!

    Probably would make sense for Bijan to sit out but that makes me sad - he's so good and it's hard to believe we only get 1 more game (maybe 2) with him.

  3. 2 hours ago, BigHornedLurker said:

    only new thing i want out of realignment is for the Big 10 to be appropriately attributed with killing those rose bowl 

    The ultimate disrespect will be when eventually the B1G fully takes over the PAC remnants and turns the Rose Bowl into the site of the B1G championship game.

  4. 22 hours ago, Sbbruin said:

    Apparently the hangup on a tv deal is Kliavkoff clinging to the pipe dream that he can get the UC Regents to overrule UCLA's move to the B1G, which isn't happening.  But that piece needs resolution prior to signing.

    How likely is it that UCLA is forced to hand over some of that sweet sweet B1G revenue to Cal?

  5. 3 hours ago, hobbes2702 said:

    They didn’t lure Saban anywhere. He was floundering with the Dolphins and was on the verge of being fired.

    This whole bit is stupid. Blue blood programs have always recycled coaches. Always.

    Since Bear, Bama has had two coaches make it 3 years or more. Stallings and Saban. That’s since 1982.

    Since McKay in 75 USC has had Carroll only make it more than 5 years. 

    LSU had 4 coaches in the 80s and 3 in the 90s before Saban and Miles.

    Since Holtz in 96 only Kelly with more than 4 at Notre Dame.

    The list goes on and on

    Wait...blue bloods fire coaches?  No way!  No one is arguing against that.

    The question is: have you seen enough from Sark now to pull the plug at year 1.5, or is that counter productive?  What is the correct amount of time vs. progress (in W/L, in recruiting, in team building, etc)?  Personally, I don't think 1.5 years is enough to make that call, yet.  My eyes see progress in recruiting, production on offense, etc.  Sark's .500 W/L record is also unacceptable, and both can be true...for now.  I think a year from now you look to see the other stuff manifesting in the record more.  But everyone seems to admit that our hiring process is random at best and broken at worst, it seems to be very luck driven.  We want to spin that wheel again?  We could end up with Charlie 2.0 taking us into the SEC.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  6. Whenever time travel is involved my brain gets fucked up.  In this world, the future can reach back into the past and find multiple "stubs" where the past branched out differently?  Like climbing down tree and going up a different branch?  I guess we'll find out the point of doing that during the season somehow?  And rich klept homie is killing off his great grand family in these stubs because...why?  Are we going to find out later that the actions within a stub can also alter this future timeline? 

  7. 16 minutes ago, hook me said:

    This used to be a dumb comment, but in a world with NIL this is a completely idiotic comment. You answered your own question - not once, not twice, but three times & forgot a new reason that goes right at the top.  

    Yeah, you're wrong.  Otherwise high profile coaches would be falling over themselves to take Texas and we wouldn't be resorting to flash in the pan G5 coaches and head coaches recycled as coordinators.  We'd be talking about Coach Saban's 8th title at Texas by now.  Our fanbase consistently overestimates the attractiveness of the Texas HFC job.  It's probably top 5-10 - but if you're talking pulling about a proven coach who has won titles already, there's only a handful of those and they already have attractive jobs, have great recruiting, have a NIL program setup, and most importantly have their boosters and administration working with them not against them.  Oh and they won't be on the hot seat after some poor results like they would at Texas and probably already have better talent in place than Texas with their system already implemented.

    This is the root cause of why statements like "money whip" in regard to hiring coaches is so dumb.  First, we don't do that.  Second, even if we did, any truly great coach is going to look at Texas and our dysfunction and ask themselves what's more attractive: running their existing system and job for 10% less money but having ultimate job security for as long as they want in, or making slightly more at Texas while having to rebuild all the systems that made them great to begin with and risk getting fired in year 3 if any of the 100 variables you don't control don't work out in your favor.  You don't have to be a genius to figure it out.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Fuck You 1
  8. 6 minutes ago, Tex Long said:

    The version of "lost" that occurred to me is "disoriented". My main concern regarding that is that might have been a result of pain meds, for the clavicle problem and/or the mysterious fingernail lift. Could be a slight o'd effect, maybe interaction between meds for the one and meds for the other.

    Regardless, the complete lack of any adjustment in-game is troubling. I am troubled.

    Agree w/ the post above that in-game adjustment WAS attempted in many factors: route trees, layers, protection, etc.  It didn't work.  If the gripe here is about not pulling QE for Card that's different.  I disagree that Card would have made things better, that's 50/50 at best considering the in-the-face pressure QE was seeing, Card has a history of bad decision making there.  Worse than QE was Saturday?  We'll never know.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  9. Being a coach in the NIL era must suck.  Take Xavier Worthy, he has an effort issue.  Under the old "rules" pre-NIL, you bench his ass and get his attention.  Nowadays, "LOL sure whatever coach, I get paaaaaiiiid either way, and BTW I'm transferring somewhere where the coach promises me more exposure and is easier on me/more fun/etc next year, k thx bye."  NIL has institutionalized coddling, along with the free transfer.  Imagine NFL-level prima donna, who also had unlimited free agency and fully guaranteed contracts.  Yikes.

    • Hook 'Em 5
    • Rage+1 1
  10. 57 minutes ago, Rockethorn1978 said:

    I’m more mad at myself for clicking the play button. I knew it would make me more angrier but I did it anyways. Watching those is like the times I drunk banged the fatties on the forty acres because I was horny af. In the moment it’s all wet so it’s cool, afterwards it’s just disgust.

    There is literally nothing a Texas coach can say in a post-game press conference after a loss that would make a fan feel better.  If you want to watch it as a reason to scream or because you're a masochist go for it.

    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
×
×
  • Create New...