Jump to content

Pato del Muerto

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    51935
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by Pato del Muerto

  1. Another wonderful secret
  2. But it’s the democrats that give away free shit!!!
  3. Double post replying to Twicehorn about twins. So meta.
  4. That’s at least the second person claiming to have been laid off after 30 or more years in IT. Shouldn’t someone with that profile have a ton of money? Or at least enough to use their own bootstraps and not be begging for help on day one?
  5. Does this get you into the airspace controlled by the happy, not overworked controllers?
  6. McGuire to Auburn and traylor to tech?
  7. The best way to do this is certainly not to let Texas race out to a 24 point 4th quarter lead and then stomp on the scale enough to help vandy all the way back but only with dumb Texas shit going on as well to help. The manner in which it happened makes the conspiracy doubt worthy.
  8. I don’t think that answers my question. A grocery store participates in snap, does the equal treatment for customer rule apply to all customers and all prices, or just snap (or whichever federal program)?
  9. So it’s illegal to offer discounts only to those that signed up for a store account?
  10. All sooner fans and some talking heads pregame: mateer is throwing darts in warmup. Texas is in trouble. talking heads postgame: thumb must have been bothering him.
  11. Their qb was throwing left handed for that game! Doesn’t count!
  12. Would you rather watch Texas play a good team in September or January? Because losing former will have an adverse affect on the latter. And we would be sitting pretty right now at 8-1 with all of our early flaws, to be able to take advantage of our seasonal growth and winning 2 of our last 3 would virtually guarantee us a spot instead of being a bubble team.
  13. This picture shows that the goal line pylon is correctly positioned right in line with the leading edge of the goal line. This first picture shows some white between the top of the pylon and the green of the field, indicating that this picture has some angle to it. the video from which the lower image set is taken is obviously from a more severe angle, but it does appear to show the ball getting closer to the plane as it gets closer to the pylon, which makes it tougher to believe that it was closer at an earlier point than it was as it passes in front of the pylon.
  14. Fair disagreement. Care to make the effort to show it to me?
  15. Ok then I was wrong. But that means he decided it was good after the ball missed the pylon, at which time the only logical conclusion is that it never crossed.
  16. Haven’t tried to find a replay to watch but live as soon as the ball misses the pylon I looked at the ref and he already had two hands up, so he must have called it good somewhere around the second image above. Somehow.
  17. If it was over the plane, it would have touched the pylon. If it had touched the pylon, we would have seen it move in the overhead or seen the pylon cam image move. Since that didn’t happen, the ball was not over the portion of the plane in which the pylon existed. based on visual cues, the ball was never nearer the goal line plane than when it was near the pylon. So if it didn’t touch the pylon then, it couldn’t have compressed the plane previously in open space where a guess would have had to have been made. it’s ok to use middle school level science to mathematically prove it didn’t happen. instead we got…well there’s angles so we will just go with the on field call.
  18. Was he still tired of being alone?
  19. I still can’t believe the 2 point replay. I can’t believe the on-field call either, but mistakes get made. Upon replay, there was no shot that showed the ball breaking the plane. None. Zero evidence it happened. But for some reason the decision was that the official had a better angle than all of the cameras so we have to go with that. by that definition, it shouldn’t even be reviewable unless you put a camera right where you say it needs to be in order to overturn a call. Otherwise, every camera will have an angle and the SJ will obviously be to the millimeter right down the line to have a better view than all of them.
  20. Was she giving out dos if you swiped your money near her hand but not actually complete the transaction?
  21. That’s what I’ve never understood about the “you could call holding every play” thing. If you did, players would adjust, and then you couldn’t and wouldn’t. if “egregious” holding is all you want to call for game flow purposes then 1) change the rule and codify it as such, and 2) don’t ever call ticky tack or phantom holds since they obviously don’t meet your criterion of egregious.
  22. If they’d call it several times in a row, maybe they’d stop holding. Ignoring it encourages it.
  23. What about Ahmet and dweezil Zappa? adding Jason bonham and Nick collins. elle king’s dad is slightly more famous than jimmy jazz.
  24. When so much of your audience are unbridled buffoons, you are smart to employ people that think and communicate on that level. Saban isn’t talking to the same people that Desmond is.
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...