Yeah, I'm in commercial real estate and negotiate commercial leases pretty much daily. And enforce them as well when necessary. In fact, dealing with a similar situation where we anticipate a breach by a very large retail tenant. They have vacated and while they continue to pay rent, they were recently acquired by a large VC firm who is notorious for defaulting and litigating. They have offered a pitiful termination offer (roughly $030 on the dollar). Their rent is way above market. We've told them to get fucked. Well I have specifically. They have threatened to declare bankruptcy which would allow them to reject the lease outright, but their financial profile doesn't really allow for that. So we are prepared to go to battle on this. And we should prevail. In this case, UCLA has absolutely no real grounds to terminate. While we would have an obligation to mitigate by finding a replacement tenant, thereby reducing the tenant's obligation, the Rose Bowl really doesn't have that option. There are no potential replacement tenants. I see no way UCLA prevails. And there very likely is an attorneys' fees clause which would require the prevailing party to be reimbursed for it out of pocket costs to enforce.