Jump to content

TheBryMan81

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    2127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TheBryMan81

  1. He's just one guy, so if he is successful, I'd consider that more "exception to the rule" rather than "myth buster"
  2. Ok Wemby I see you. Maybe he needs to go pay the Spurs of North London a visit Ok, never mind, we can stop this now
  3. Define "crazy" I said this earlier, Cam Newton reportedly got paid $180,000 as a senior to go play 1 year at Auburn. That's a drop in the bucket now. Will bagmen be able to pay 10x that now under the table? And I feel like most of the under the table stuff back then was on a player by player basis, not across an entire roster. I think there is a close to zero chance that any school that utilizes under the table bagmen will be able to compete with what Texas/Oregon/Ohio State will pay, legally, across an entire roster. Also, to your last question: Wisconsin vs Miami https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45552578/wisconsin-sues-miami-tampering-football-transfer
  4. I still don't understand this sky is falling bullshit. What "different rule book" are you talking about? (With regards to now, not back in the 80s) The different rule book that led us to retaining a roster that went to back to back semi finals? The different rule book that JUST signed and delivered a #1 class? Also, I'm laughing at the notion that you actually think Bag men can outspend Texas, regardless of whether or not we follow the rules. Bag men paid Cam Newton $180,000. That's chump change now, even within the lateral limits set by "the rules". You think Bag men are somehow going to all of a sudden come up with that amount for multiple players within a 25 man recruiting class? Or 10x that amount for today's 5 star? There are very few teams that I'm worried about matching/outspending Texas across an entire recruiting class or an entire roster regardless of bag man. And none of them are in the SEC.
  5. How so? If Texas were operating like a pussy, wouldn't we have lost Hill/Simmons/Muhammad/Wingo/Moore/Guilbeau by now? Or are you under the impression that their NIL deals haven't been renegotiated each off-season?
  6. This is a non issue until we see deals actually get denied, precedent set, and actual enforcement/consequences happen. Until then, it's all boogeyman bullshit.
  7. Are you guys under the impression that Texas athletes are some how going to stop getting NIL deals? There is NO LIMIT to what an athlete can make through NIL sponsorships. Texas AD can pay athletes up to the $20 million cap.... Plus they can make NIL revenue on the side that does not affect the cap at all, including through Texas One Fund. Do you really think some SEC bag man in fucking Tuscaloosa/Gainesville/Baton Rouge is going to be able to spend more than Texas One Fund? Correct me if I'm wrong, but what am I missing here? How could AD revenue + bag man + NIL sponsorships for Uncle Bob's Sunflower Seeds in bum fuck nowhere be a threat to Texas AD revenue + Austin corporate sponsorship + Texas One Fund NIL?
  8. Just the confidence boost that Frees needed imo. Let's see if he takes that moving forward
  9. Hits close to home as I live here in San Diego now and went out last night. Definitely some great eye candy to hang out with
  10. Softball I get... But why is canoeing being hosted there?
  11. With that stadium and complex, doubtful.
  12. If you read the article, it very much reads like "We definitely could've had this super awesome really big name, but that's not how we do things here so we hired internally instead" Trying to pump up their hire as more than what it is
  13. Here's the tweet with the full video. It was mostly talking about goals, seeing those names up there. Then Schloss pointed out Swindell, Drusseldorf, and Kiesch as guys who were up there who were BA National Freshman of the Year..."Just like you are now" I might be a little late to the train here, but Weiner is only 30???
  14. Away kit official "In Darkness We Dare"
  15. Didn't he coach Piperi to a (multiple?) national championship?
  16. It seems like the umpires either ignored or didn't know the "would've been out either way" part of the rule because it was buried in the footnote. I'm assuming the discussion/clarification was just an emphasis on the common sense part of the rule: if the runner is out by 5 feet, the runner is fucking out, there is no obstruction
  17. Girls were at the soccer game today
  18. TheBryMan81

    Austin FC

    Softball girls at the game
×
×
  • Create New...