This is the hilarious part about all of the bootlickers lining up to embarrass themselves. “It’s a hoax, it’s clearly faked” etc. Yeah that’s from a 22 year-old book. A lot of this, unfortunately, would have gone away if Trump had just said “I think I just had someone do a doodle real quick and I signed it without paying attention. I don’t know what it means now and I didn’t back then either.” But, neither he nor his cult members operate that way, even when it’s really, really in his best interests to do so.
Well I haven’t seen even so much as a preview, but her name is Wednesday Addams. And she is part of a Family. So, I think it’s a take on Beetlejuice. Well I haven’t seen even so much as a preview, but her name is Wednesday Addams. And she is part of a Family. So, I think it’s a take on Beetlejuice.
(shown dozens of videos of Trump fucking children over the years, backed up by signed affidavits from the victims as well as witnesses) “Interesting. Trump is clearly covering for someone. Probably Obama. But why??”
Thinking Biden said it: “Remove him from office now! Everyone must be regretting their votes for Biden now that he has said that one thing!” After learning Trump said it: “oh well I guess he made a silly. It could happen to anyone. Anyway….”
His busty press secretary tried to take a victory lap yesterday over this signature. "It's clearly not President Trump's signature." Everyone: "Um, yes it is."
There's a Trump interview out there - I don't remember who it was with, maybe Stern? - from about 15 years ago, where he's asked "Is there such thing as 'too young' for you?" and he thinks for a second, before saying "Well I wouldn't have sex with a 12 year-old". I saw this for the first time probably a few weeks ago, after he had already been elected president twice. Someone post it if they know what I'm talking about.
“Cherry picking” Fucking press charges against Clinton if he did anything illegal. Please. I think the vast majority of democrats would agree, as opposed to 99.99% of republicans who continue to fight any sort of justice when it comes to their cult leader.
They're arguing about a signature on a picture (with no actual argument to even make), when everyone knows Trump and Epstein were good friends for about 15 years. Epstein's prime rapin' and sex trafficking years. Let's just all skip over that part and argue about one picture. That's the genius.
Well, that says Donald Trump. On the Epstein picture he drew, he signed it Donald. And it looks like it always does. But other than that, nailed it Wesley. No notes.
Why would the WSJ need to show that letter to Vance before publishing it? Outside of verifying authenticity, why should they be required to show it around to anyone in the Trump orbit?
A movie can be important or influential, but I don't see how any superhero movie not called The Avengers or The Dark Knight or Superman could be called "genre-defining".
Just heard Mike Johnson's attempt to explain what he meant by "Trump was an FBI informant". I'm paraphrasing, "Oh, did I use the wrong word? This isn't my lane. I don't know what these words mean. I was just saying what everyone knows already."
hahahaha