-
Posts
303 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
494 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
I get this point of view but I cannot disagree more that moving on to a different topic was the correct move. Whatever the next set of questions may be, trump is going to lie in his answer. He will lie, the interviewer will *politely* try to call him out, he'll say something like "this is why your industry is dying, because you're so dishonest and unfair", rinse and repeat. Nothing is gained by interviewing a habitual liar when you're not prepared to plant a flag on a specific issue and call him a fucking liar to his face. This absurd ms13 question was a chance to catch him in a lie in real time, and actually have him react to being caught. Like, how simple would it have been to take a picture of your own fist and add the text on your iphone right in front of him? At worst, he would realize that the nazi cuntbag stephen miller lied to him about the actual tattoo. I dunno... seems like a huge missed opportunity to be a journalist with a fucking spine for once..
-
Really just that they have not explicitly done that to date. Miller/Rubio/Bondi all go through the trouble of lying about the 9-0 court result, lying about the criminality of Abrego-Garcia, lying about the fact that our government is helpless in bringing him back. They have not said, in simple terms, that the executive is above the courts in all matters related to deportation. Just that the courts cannot direct the executive on how to conduct foreign policy. And now that I've typed this, it really seems like it's distinction without difference. So yeah... we are proper fucked.
-
All of this makes perfect sense and I'd not entertain the idea in a sane world. But I don't put it past the administration to draft a brand new type of agreement that precludes the signee from disclosing anything to any judge/court "due to national security concerns" or some such bullshit. And even if it's not enforceable and is deemed legally void, the message sent is clear: shut the fuck up and go live your life in the shadows or we will dead you. After today's unanimous ruling, it seems like trump really has no off ramp on this issue, aside from telling all the courts to go fuck themselves and throwing everything even further into chaos. I guess then we'll see how deep this black hole really goes.
-
Dumb question amnesty... Would it be legal to bring this guy back on the condition that he signs an NDA? Blame the "activist judges" for forcing us to bring back a dangerous gang member criminal, put him in protective custody with his family and have some ICE goons threaten to disappear him again if he talks. It's a way for trump to take an L without losing his narrative and maybe he gets lucky and this guy's story never gets out.
-
The Leopards Eating Faces and Unlubed Dildo of Consequences Thread
Todd Gack replied to Horn Dog's topic in Cloak Room
I think you can be at the lowest elevation in an isolated area adjacent to a floodplain and still be out of the floodplain. There would just need to be a breakline of sorts between the 100-yr floodplain and your area/subdivision. The one thing that might've boned you is there may have been a LOMR (letter of map revision) in review at the time you checked the FEMA flood maps, and said LOMR might've shifted the floodplain due to surrounding developments. Hard to know for sure what happened without lots more details. But as a general rule, if you want to buy land anywhere close to a floodplain and you notice new developments being built in the area, it's very hard to trust the publicly available flood maps as being the most current. -
I don't think it's nuance as much as people are trying to make sense of the potential logistics of it all. So you're stopped on the street, put in cuffs, and stuffed into a van. After that, I assume you're blindfolded and either taken to a random holding facility or straight to the airport. Is it there where someone tells you "I hope you told your family you loved them this morning because you'll never see them again. You're going to a South American torture prison where you will eventually die." Or do they take a page from the family separators at the border and lie the way ICE told parents that their kids would be returned to them after a medical evaluation? I'm not sure what exactly is gained from this clarification, but it's a mind-boggling series of events that we're witnessing and will likely need to explain to our kids someday.
-
yeah that's the Reddit consensus I saw for a low recoil starter handgun. Wife who has never even touched a gun will need something almost toy-like to learn. And the shotgun is def on the list. Hunter buddies have been telling me that for years - pistol-grip shotgun with buckshot for general home defense.
-
Prolly should be a separate thread, but what type of "arms" should a person who knows fuck-all about guns (me) look to invest in? Fired my first non-pellet gun at a range during my bachelor party about 8 years ago. Wife will be a hard sell to keep them in the house, but desperate times...
-
"Nazi Barbie" in the comments pretty much sums it up
-
Indeed it is. Another fun fact... did you know Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars?
-
Elon Musk: Nazi traitor piece of shit [Confirmed]
Todd Gack replied to MaybeACoordinator's topic in Daily Texan
Super PAC is my understanding http://apnews.com/article/elon-musk-america-pac-trump-d248547966bf9c6daf6f5d332bc4be66 -
Winter Weather 2025 - Arctic Blasts or Sweaty Ass?
Todd Gack replied to NorthLoop's topic in Daily Texan
- 1168 replies
-
- 11
-
-
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... Advertise... COOKIE MONSTER!