Jump to content

Pancho

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    13971
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Pancho

  1. This isn’t true, and I’m not sure why it’s gaining steam on this website the last hour or so
  2. I'm not disagreeing with you on anything. My post was stating that I don't see why people get upset at others on this website who question possibility and probability when looking at this. It's like they are being treated as outcasts because they are accounting for possiblities that (gasp) may not favor Texas.
  3. You’re off a bit here. It helps to be ou over OSU, yes, because ou will be ranked 10-13 and I can’t see OSU getting above 15th; however, that is minor compared to the most major thing which is needing FSU to lose.
  4. Aggy beat writer Zweneremansans is now saying Dabo is emerging. If so, I called that weeks ago.
  5. Winning yet another B12 title on our way out the door. Adios and fuck this conference
  6. Can’t it be said you’re rubbing your pussy too hard here as well? No one is denying what you wrote above rather people are just questioning why Oregon has continued to be ahead of Texas in spite of all of the above. If both Oregon and Texas win their CCG and Oregon is already above Texas, it’s a valid question to ask why would the committee all of a sudden move Texas ahead of Oregon with the same record and same result after having beat a higher ranked team in their CCG? That isn’t denying what we’ve accomplished rather it’s just a valid question to be asked—that’s all. There’s nothing wrong with that yet people are getting upset about asking the question and accounting for probability/possibility. You’re 100% correct at the above, though. And if the committee does move Texas above Oregon and we both have Conference Championships, then it makes me question the credibility of the committee yet again because why didn’t you move Texas ahead of them weeks ago if you’re justification is one or more of the accomplishments posted above? That’s really it. It’s not that big of a deal.
  7. I’d take the higher probable path to the playoff and that is with oklahoma state in the game, not ou. I also wouldn’t count out Oklahoma state just yet. They were in a similar situation against Houston and came back pretty easily, albeit this is a deeper hole.
  8. He looks like his beard is drawn on with a sharpie
  9. Iowa is pretty much going to the Citrus Bowl
  10. Yeah, I sort of figured that out based on his posting. And there is no fucking long game when rooting for aggy. Them losing is always hilarious.
  11. It’s being pushed by aggies so they can continue manufacturing the idea they are a college football big boy when the rest of college football knows better
  12. They are getting roasted on XM 84 college Gameday with Bobby Carpenter and Chris Plank ”just like to show they can spend money” ”meme for spending money and winning nothing” ”1 season with 10 or more wins since 1999” ”if you already have something rolling and are already in the big 10 or sec, why would you start over at A&M?” ”a&m isn’t even #1 in their state—that’s Texas”
  13. It’s like Dusty was telling Pasch last night—if you’re going to use that argument (Alabama is better now than in week 2) and not give Texas credit for going in to Tuscaloosa and beating then, then what is the point of playing those types of games?
  14. Yup picking up steam. Some writer mentioned Stoops’ name a few weeks ago and said he’s not big time enough for A&M but would be a good hire. Would be…interesting fa sho
×
×
  • Create New...