Jump to content

Bill Lumbergh

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    2453
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Bill Lumbergh

  1. I'm not trying to change your minds on Saban, but I do think this is necessary input on the "no fun to be around" evaluation: https://saturdaytradition.com/big-ten-football/nick-saban-apparently-a-big-fan-of-making-deez-nuts-jokes/
  2. I just flipped it on and we already had this gem: "this is the most out of conference early season losses for the sec that I can remember, at least for the teams that people think matter...Alabama, LSU, A&M..."
  3. Holy fucking shit. I saw posts about this but missed the actual ad. Bad idea jeans. Let's play a game where you take a shot for every minority featured in the ad. Sad, lonely shot. Just amazing.
  4. Just a reminder that they actually did this shit
  5. What exactly is the "everything" he's referring to here? Edit: SA beat me by seconds
  6. Am I supposed to "book it" or "mark it down" in this specific situation?
  7. Pete K is a dude. I lived in Seattle for a while and had trouble squaring how UW fans felt about him and what we saw in year 1. At this point I'm convinced we just had bad personnel and poor technical coaching for what he wanted to do. Rather than change it a lot in year one, he kept rolling with his system knowing we might have to take some lumps to get there faster. At this point that looks like the right call. I've questioned Sark on a lot of things, but his faith in the defensive staff seemed unwavering and seems to reflect that he knows talent when he hires it and isn't shaken by early returns. "These guys didn't just forget how to coach" was essentially the answer after year one. Looks like they did not.
  8. The guy has been shamed enough already. No need to try to knock him down another peg.
  9. I disagree, but that's ok. To me there are symptoms that there might be crazy shit going on, and theories on both sides of this debate to try to explain those symptoms. But nothing concrete to entirely prove or refute either side of the debate. That by definition feels like arguing religion to me. You're taking a set of hard to explain things and biasing towards believing one explanation over another plausible explanation. Neither can be proven right or wrong (overall) so it just comes down to what you choose to believe.
  10. It's not religion, but at some level arguing this stuff feels like arguing religion. It's going to be impossible, at this stage, for anyone to conclusively prove anything in either direction. Belief is in how you choose to view a set of shared information everyone has, but no one can fully understand. Personally I think it's more fun to entertain the possibility that things are going on around us that are of an origin we don't understand. I don't spend a lot of time on it, but do enjoy reading new things when they come out. I don't believe there's a high probability the most outlandish explanation is the most likely, but I do think it's the more fun thought to entertain. People being violently for or against a view on this stuff seems silly. No one really knows. Just view it all as incomplete parts to a puzzle that maybe will or maybe won't get more clear in our lifetime.
  11. @immamac - nearly all photos aren't showing up the last few days. Links from Twitter/X/other are working, but any images on media.surlyhorns.com aren't showing up (at least for me). Anything I need to change or try? I'm using the site (no app) on Android + Chrome.
  12. The searches and taking those items from her work (that were not in the car) pretty much tell the story.
  13. They didn't want the bloodshot eyes to be the bigger story.
  14. Only 6 total respondents from the sample in Poland were favorable. The six respondents:
  15. Strangely, this is also a direct quote from all of the aggy players who hit the portal.
×
×
  • Create New...