Jump to content

wood

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    12321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wood

  1. Sorry, I know this isn't old, but got damn. Nope.
  2. In Australia, Alonso did hit the throttle again, but not enough to actually accelerate again. The speed trace shows the car decelerating all the way until Alonso accelerated hard again exiting the turn - minus a very small portion in the middle where the speed flattened for just a moment when he blipped the throttle momentarily. That merely reduced the rate of deceleration for a moment. It didn't actually accelerate the car. He wasn't speeding up and slowing down. He slowed, maintained a constant speed very briefly, then slowed again before accelerating out of the turn. Anyway, of course none of these instances is exactly the same, but they are all examples of erratic, 'potentially dangerous' driving (which could easily describe many things we see every race session of every race weekend), combined in some cases with very unsporting driving, some of which actually ended in contact between the offending driver and another. Another I forgot about was Lewis lifting in the middle of Raidillon with Vettel right on his gearbox, and the other one where Vettel drove into him, he said it was in retaliation for Lewis brake-checking him earlier. There are so many. They happen all the time. For most of these incidents, it's not really strange that they don't get investigated. What's strange is that out of all of them, this one is the only one that suddenly ticked the boxes in just such a way as to be penalized harshly - even though the stewards said themselves that he didn't cause the crash. Pretty much all of the others went without so much as an investigation, and the biggest penalty was half of what Alonso got in Oz. Palmer said George bears at minimum a portion of the responsibility for his crash, and (when he pointed out Alonso's flashing light at the same time George was apparently changing a setting) hinted that Russell didn't realize that Alonso had scrubbed off speed, and attempted to take the corner too hot. That was his first mistake. His second mistake was trying to change direction too quickly once he was in the gravel trap.
  3. He didn't swerve to miss Alonso. He lifted, lost the rear of the car and tried to counter it, which took him off track. Even the stewards said Alonso didn't cause George to go off. They penalized him for 'erratic' and 'potentially unsafe' driving. Whatever that is. Seems pretty nebulous. Esp for a 20s penalty. Jolyon Palmer rightly pointed out Alonso doing the same to Lewis just 3 races ago in Abu Dhabi. Alonso slowed in front of Lewis, 'playing DRS games' as Jolyon put it. Much more obvious slowing, farther from the corner, but Lewis didn't freak out and lose the car or run into Alonso. Not even noted or investigated iirc. Here's Palmer's analysis. Spot on imho. Reminded me of this. Also not noted or investigated iirc. People are bringing up many other examples of obvious erratic driving not even being investigated, including George blocking Lewis two different times in qualifying in Spain and Belgium, once causing a collision. He blocked Lewis and then lifted on the Kemmel straight with Lewis very close behind, after he'd already locked up and ruined his own lap. In Spain he just drove right into Lewis. He got a warning. There's KMag just last race and many other examples of people backing up the field to help their teammate, people tactically slowing to disadvantage following cars that were much closer than George and at higher speeds, mid-corner, Lewis slowing the grid to back Rosberg up into Vettel, Max causing a collision with a brake-check and getting 10s, countless instances of people actually causing collisions or driving wildly and getting 5s or nothing at all, etc.
  4. So the little fucker in the wifebeater seems to be the one starting the shit, and then takes the bitchass blindside shot at VY. Is he the one that took the elbow (ie is he the club owner) from the big fucker in the white shirt who was apparently helping VY? What a fucking pussy. He's wagging his finger & pointing at VY for a bit and then appears to push or poke the bear, which is when VY had had enough. It was pretty funny watching VY hold off all four of those pussies until Bruh did his thing. I'm sure that's not a first for him.
  5. Going out to the relays Friday. Question. I see GA tickets for sale, with row numbers. Where do they put GA folks at the Relays? None of the maps show GA.
  6. Like the one time out on 6th this little pussy blindsided me and then ran and hid behind the bouncer of the club we were next in line to get into. I lost my shit but I couldn't get to him. Cop standing right there must've seen the guy hit me and run, because otherwise he'd have probably pepper-sprayed me immediately. He was just looking the other way like "I'll allow it". Never got to the guy. Still pisses me off 20 years later. People like that need some jail time with people you wouldn't dare hit when they aren't looking.
  7. One reason Max might want to leave is that with the new PU coming in 2026 and RBR having no experience building engines, he might want to jump to a works team. Rumor has it now that Horner wants Alonso and has been courting him for next year if Max leaves. Alonso would likely only go on a 1-year deal, because things are looking pretty good at Aston Martin with Honda coming onboard. If I'm Alonso, I'd either stay put or go to RBR. Mercedes would have some convincing to do imho.
  8. BREAKING: Mercedes F1 boss Toto Wolff to miss the Japanese Grand Prix https://www.planetf1.com/news/toto-wolff-to-miss-2024-japanese-grand-prix
  9. Yeah I was out there for that one too. It's crazy how the crowd has dropped off year by year after that.
  10. Oh, and imagine if Andretti showed up and embarrassed themselves and F1, because a megabucks racing team couldn’t design a working wheel nut. Oh, the shame and disrepute they would bring on the pinnacle of motorsport.
  11. Yeah I think you're probably right. Alonso said he didn't get it quite the way he wanted it, too. I'm still blown away watching the onboard from George's car. In terms of what we see all the time in F1, he just had plenty of time to react to that, but George has shown us before that he doesn't exactly have catlike reflexes.
  12. Guess he was wrong then. The stewards said Alonso lifted more than he had previously and touched his brake so briefly and slightly that it wasn't a significant factor in slowing the car.
  13. Nailed it? The stewards said the telemetry didn't show a brake check. So I guess not. I also didn't hear Brundle say Alonso 'brake-checked' George, at least not during the race, but maybe I missed it. He did say Alonso slowed more than George was probably expecting. There's no rule against that and no rule, as Alonso points out, that you have to take every corner the same way all race long. Alonso made a strategic move that caught the following car off guard. Changing a setup into a corner is textbook race craft. In terms of driving at that speed Russell was well behind Alonso. George didn't anticipate the move and was caught out by the increased dirty air. Just because 1 driver didn't predict the movement of another driver doesn't make it erratic. George had more than enough time to avoid a crash, but we've seen mistakes just as silly from George before. His onboard ...
  14. Yeah I don't think he was trying to wreck Russell or do anything nefarious. He said he was trying to go a little slower in to get a better exit and speed on the following stretch. He said it's a normal defensive move he's done and had done to him numerous times over more than 20 years in F1. Even the stewards didn't seem to think it was really intentional but seemed to think they just had to give some kind of penalty, so gave him a drivethrough that converted to 20s. I don't agree with it, but it's not terrible. Oh well. I don't think there's anything that indicates he was trying to induce a lockup. Fernando made great points after the race that ...
  15. Got free tickets from a friend who also got them for free and decided not to go. NASCAR provided free parking in lots F and H. Everyone was waiting in line for lot F and we just cruised right passed 'em and rolled right into lot H all alone. So that was cool. Race was pretty unremarkable. The stages really kill much chance for strategy to have any effect on the order at a road circuit (and maybe anywhere, I guess). We left with 20 to go and were ordering burgers near the house by the time the race ended. And yeah, Pretty small crowd. Maybe 25K ish, despite NASCAR doing a good job running the show (and about 2000 of those people entered with tickets donated to Del Valle school district employees). I'm not sure the NASCAR crowd and Austin are a good fit. I'm one of the people who said NASCAR would be great racing at COTA. I gotta say I swung and missed on that call. It's not great, for some reason.
  16. 70F too warm? Maybe Saturday attendance just isn't a big thing for NASCAR the way it is in sportscar and other racing. This is nuts. There might be 5K people out there if they're lucky. Brutal for NASCAR and ISC. And yeah, definitely. Go SVG!!
  17. Oh my. There is noooobody at COTA for the XFinity race.
  18. I bet Andretti - Cadillac would have shown up in Melbourne with a spare chassis or two. Maybe it's actually the reverse of what FOM suggests. Perhaps it's F1 that's not healthy enough to be worth a serious 11th team's time, money, and effort
  19. Re: Williams, the important bit of this imho is that they showed up to the 3rd race of the season without a spare chassis. How in the actual fuck does that happen in an F1 that's rejecting Andretti on the grounds that they aren't a serious enough entry? Me three. Jim McKay was the face of F1, and the only race we got to see (portions of) was Monaco. I guess we're showing our age ...
×
×
  • Create New...