Jump to content

MuellerHorn

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    4002
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MuellerHorn

  1. Good, we know how this inevitably ends for them then.
  2. Texas: Royal Ivey: can coach, would drive program support, but totally unproven at the college level. Brad Underwood: meh. Sean Miller: meh. Todd Golden: seems like a decent HC given his short career, but also might be a sexual predator. Will Wade: dirty as fuck, but the guy can coach. Unlikely we hire him. other top tier coaches via money whip:
  3. x She looks like a pretty (damn good) coach:
  4. Texas is the only remaining "non-chalk" seed.
  5. Tre's offensive arsenal is so deep. He hits difficult looks with ease.
  6. "We gotta rebound though," too
  7. Makes sense. Empty the tarp off in the outfield, drain, and disperse any puddles well ahead of time.
  8. For sure. Saturday appears to be a complete thunderstorm wash bookended by good weather on F/Sun. My only concern would be outfield conditions on Sunday, especially since it’s grass/dirt, but I would have to assume there’s a pretty good process in place given this is common in the SEC and it’s only projected to be an inch of rain. I know baseball but I don’t know much about baseball groundskeeping. Anyone here have more insight?
  9. This team isn't playing in the NIT. If (read: when) Texas misses the tournament and RT is fired, Texas won't accept an invite.
  10. And of course Gaspo tries to lay down a bunt now.
  11. Yeah. I should have been more clear.
  12. I’m probably wrong, but I don’t remember us bunting yet this season. Doesn’t really seem like it’s in Schloss’ playbook.
  13. Three in a row. That sequence may answer our question as to if the defense is improving. Especially after an errorless series this last weekend.
  14. Two fantastic defensive plays in a row.
  15. Definition of a slugger right there.
  16. This as a response never gets old.
  17. Finally someone who will engage my hypothetical. And again, y’all, I agree that given cumulative résumés of the five schools under consideration for a one seed, Texas should clearly get one. I would just really like to avoid UConn prior to the F4.
  18. I agree with you. I merely wanted to post the question to see what the ideal scenario may look like.
  19. Like many here, I believe the committee won't fall victim to recency bias, BUT what are the alternatives where a two seed makes more competitive sense for Texas? For instance, if we land a one seed but get UConn as our two, I'm not sure that's better than being the first two in USC's region.
  20. Yep. I agree with everything you said. I don't see him getting two more titles in Denver though. We'll see.
  21. If Cam Williams falls to the top of the third, I think he probably should have come back. The drop off in salary/signing bonus is pretty material from where he was originally rumored (late first) to early third (see below). Had he come back (especially if he played LT), it seems like it would have made a real difference. However, that's just my opinion and I have no real idea what next year's crop of tackles looks like. Mid/Later Round 1:
  22. Certainly would have helped with outside shooting. Teams wouldn't be able to sag back in a 2-3/2-1-2 zone if Phelia/Holle or Phelia/Lee were on the court most of the time. That would then open up the interior to feed the bigs. Get Phelia healthy and back, get Chavez on campus, and secure a portal big to spell Oldacre and next year looks very promising. One can dream all these variables align...
  23. Dead on, Js1. Other than holding SCar to a poor shooting percentage and dominance by Jones and Oldacre, these were strategic underpinnings of the win at home.
×
×
  • Create New...