Jump to content
Ad weirdness being fixed.

Kyle

banned
  • Posts

    1,684
  • Joined

Posts posted by Kyle

  1. 3 minutes ago, Hmbre97 said:

    Because it's dumb and doesn't deserve a response? Anyone who supports Trump has zero credibility in trying to criticize someone being accused of grfiting/shady real estate purchases. People who support BLM will continue to support it just like dumb fucks who voted for and put Trump in the white house.

    Can you re-post in English and correctly use "dumb?"

    • Fuck You 18
  2. 3 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    That's not what irony means, either literally or sarcastically. You are not a very bright person.

    There's nothing to respond to in the original post. Somebody is making money off of a social justice cause. My level of surprise is zero. I didn't respond to it because it wasn't necessary; the only interesting part of the post was that you once again made a blatantly political post on the Daily Texan forum because you're one of the scared little babies that want to have your safe space where you don't have to discuss anything. So you make your political posts on the non-political forum. And this time somebody who is actually very close to your location on the political spectrum called you out on it, to which your reply referenced the "Gestapo of the Democrat Party" (but you're definitely not being political!) and also jizz jars.

    You are a very stupid person making very stupid posts and hoping to deflect attention away from that fact by repeatedly referencing socks, semen, and socialism.

    Thanks Alanis. Again. I'm not available, but I appreciate the obsession.

    • Fuck You 20
  3. 4 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

    I for one am not a socialist. I also don't really care for the BLM organization. But I'm going to neg you anyway, and the reason is that you're an obnoxiously dumb jerkoff.聽

    You are too聽stupid to know the definition of dumb, jerkoff sock.

    • Fuck You 18
  4. Just now, Huckleberry said:

    I don't have a single sock on this forum. I conveniently tagged the administrator who will be able to confirm that for you later. It's聽difficult for someone with your issues to understand but there really are this many people who recognize how dumb you are.

    #irony. You have not made a cogent response to the topic but just released your jizz jar of socks. Why can't you respond to the topic (the original post)?

    • Fuck You 17
  5. 6 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    Here is another very stupid post where you project your failings onto someone else. I do appreciate that unlike most dullards you blatantly contradict yourself within a single two sentence post. Take this one for example where you accuse someone else of not being able to draft intelligent replies and then proceed to reference wedgies, swirlies, and Tinder after previously referring to a surgery not taking, which I can only assume was some sort of pitiful attempt to attack my manhood or something.

    And I really mean that I appreciate the effort. Based on your posting history I think everyone can agree that absolutely nothing comes easily for you.

    I'm sure you and your socks would welcome your response to the actual topic.

    • Fuck You 20
  6. 2 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    Here is another very stupid post where you project your failings onto someone else. I do appreciate that unlike most dullards you blatantly contradict yourself within a single two sentence post. Take this one for example where you accuse someone else of not being able to draft intelligent replies and then proceed to reference wedgies, swirlies, and Tinder after previously referring to a surgery not taking, which I can only assume was some sort of pitiful attempt to attack my manhood or something.

    And I really mean that I appreciate the effort. Based on your posting history I think everyone can agree that absolutely nothing comes easily for you.

    You literally have not made a single post on topic but just continually pine for me (and your socks).

    You certainly demonstrate that if you cross the national socialists you all will get out the long knives.

    • Fuck You 19
  7. 1 minute ago, Huckleberry said:

    That's the same guy. You're really struggling. And it's not living on the edge, it's just negging people for being really and truly stupid on a message board. The only person any of this is bothering is you. I mean I helped you with a faster way to call out what I'm doing.聽

    The reason the ability to neg posts exists is for a situation where a very stupid person is making very stupid posts. So that's what I'm using it for.

    But your tell is you cannot formulate a cogent, intellectual response. So good for you if it makes up for all those high school wedgies and swirlies ... congrats - you can put BBS badass on your Tinder, but not sure it will help聽... as noted by another poster.

    • Fuck You 23
  8. 7 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    @immamac聽can disabuse you of the notion that I have any socks. Only one username posts from my machine and it's me. Go back to your safe space if being confronted with the staggering magnitude of your ignorance hurts too much. It's why you ran away in the first place.

    I just like that you and this guy's聽idea of living on the edge is negging people on message boards. Did your shrink tell you this would make up for the elementary school playground?

    • Fuck You 21
  9. 2 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    @immamac聽can disabuse you of the notion that I have any socks. Only one username posts from my machine and it's me. Go back to your safe space if being confronted with the staggering magnitude of your ignorance hurts too much. It's why you ran away in the first place.

    I just like that you and this guy's聽idea of living on the edge is negging people on message boards. I'm sorry the surgery didn't take.聽聽

    • Fuck You 25
  10. 5 minutes ago, Hookah Horns said:

    Hussled? Lulz.聽

    Not sure how this BLM chick's scheme is supposed to discredit the entire movement for social justice, but cool story bro.聽

    We don't expect you to think in complex ways, so it's okay. "Not sure" is about the best we can hope for ... just stand there and look pretty.

    • Fuck You 20
  11. 1 minute ago, Huckleberry said:

    @Kyle聽There's a built in tagging function so you don't have to copy and paste a URL to try and out the fact that someone is negging you for being a moron.

    Everyone, I'd like to announce that I'm negging Kyle because he's being a moron.

    It's so adorbs when you have to re-login to protect your sock.

    • Fuck You 20
  12. 2 minutes ago, cattail said:


    Lol wut? You mean the chick from the insurrection who tried to storm a secure area after being warned not to at gunpoint? She fucked around and found out.

    So you think cops are justified in killing once聽they give an instruction and the perp does not聽follow it? (HINT: we'll never hear from you again on this thread)

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Haha 1
    • Fuck You 1
  13. 2 minutes ago, B00M said:

    So you're shit faced on a wednesday, getting angry about BLM, researching jizz jars, then calling everyone else aggy?聽

    1254957709501.jpg

    Sweetie ... as I told the other guy, I'm not on the market. But you should meet this guy - he's stupid but ugly.

    (Just FYI - fucking your sock is just masturbation)

    • Fuck You 20
  14. 8 minutes ago, XYZ said:

    We peaked in mid January. Now we have 1/4 of the hospitalizations that we did then. Since January we鈥檝e been coming down hard, and it couldn鈥檛 be vaccinations because in January hardly anybody had been vaccinated. So, what was it? Our awesomeness? I don鈥檛 think so.

    www.epidemiology.com

  15. 40 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:


    Can you cite where we deem every police shooting as a bad shoot? Some are good shoots. Plenty are, actually. That was one of them. She was continuing to try to enter a secure area with hostile intent after being warned. She wasn鈥檛 running away. She wasn鈥檛 just disobeying a command. She was coming AT the cops and an area they had to defend. All of that said....there were several other instances in that attack where the cops absolutely could have fired and it would have been a good shoot....but they exercised some serious-ass restraint.

    Anyone comes at a cop with hostile intent where they are defending a secure area may well get shot. Come AT a cop with a deadly weapon, including a car, and you might get shot. Come at the cops with a gun, you will likely get shot. We usually don鈥檛 criticize those shootings...because they aren鈥檛 bad shootings.

    We don鈥檛 criticize cops for arresting someone for a warrant. We don鈥檛 criticize them for taking down someone busy attacking a victim, etc etc.

    So let us get you on the record - a cop killing a person "with hostile intent where they are defending a secure area" is justified in killing said person? Question 2 - who determines "hostile intent?" So coming through a window is "hostile intent?" So "hostile intent" means someone not carrying a weapon? Did the officer think she was going to burp on him? Do you have a definition?聽

    • Fuck You 3
  • Create New...