Jump to content

bolverk

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    11632
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by bolverk

  1. 5 minutes ago, HendersonHorns said:

    Get fucked dickhead. Don’t wish injury on people. That was also ucla with that girl. 
     

    you have the “we” like you’re going to go killing people who don’t believe like you. 
     

    You’re a coward and dangerous person. And to call for killing these students should have you banned. And the piss beat out of you. 

    I agree with everything except the bolded.

  2. 43 minutes ago, HendersonHorns said:

    I don’t wish bad on these idiots. But they are going to get the shit kicked out of them if they don’t calm this down. 
     

    this is UCLA

     

    I think we need to be cautious with some of these Tweets, especially if they're not coming from actual journalists. For example, the reports from UCLA are that the cops had erected a barrier between pro-Israel and pro-Palestine protestors had been breached but it was unsure who broke through it first. The report also stated there were clashes between the two groups.

    This short clip shows a girl who was hurt and people are trying to help her. We don't actually know how she was hurt, only that "Collin Rugg" says she was beaten up by a group. It might be true, but it might also be total bullshit that it happened in the way that Collin Rugg says it happened. Well, who the hell is Collin Rugg and why should we believe him?

    Having never heard of him, I go to his Twitter page and see a long list of extremely lopsided and political tweets from a very conservative angle. He also claims to be the Co-Owner of Trending Politics and there's a fucking cybertruck on his profile page. I'm sorry, but at this point, you start to lose a lot of fucking credibility as a news source.

    image.png.459bf86f49753466faffa58a972dd138.png

     

    Let's take a visit to this "media personality's" website. It's a bunch of bullshit "articles" making a lot of very dubious claims. 

    https://trendingpolitics.com/

     

    So, please, let's try to stick with credible news sources or clips that fully show what's going on. 

     

    • Hook 'Em 8
    • Like 1
  3. 57 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

    COVID, identity protection, fellow hippies are smelly, Micro plastics are in the air, Abbott pooped his chair again. I don’t give a shit why you’re wearing a medical mask.

    Protection from po-po pepper spray.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:

    There is not a law against it in Texas, that was repealed. Maybe there’s a school reg, I don’t know. 
     

    LOL at the idea that wearing masks doesn’t help conceal identity though. 

    I think someone said somewhere up-thread that UT didn't enact a mask ban until after last week's protest, but I could be wrong on that.

  5. Can we get a Reader's Digest version of the backstory here? I don't watch ESPN during the offseason and generally don't follow political commentary from sports broadcasters. Does Acho have a history of inflammatory rhetoric or something?

  6. 33 minutes ago, Al_4_ISU said:


    Interesting read.

    Around here basements aren’t about saving space - they’re for hiding from storms and people just kinda figured if they had this space they’d use it.

    If I ever build a house from scratch, I’ll just have a fortified internal room with concrete walls. Basements are mostly a headache in my experience.

    Yeah, that one seemed a stretch. To be honest, his points about the freeze line, the type of soil, and/or the lack of topsoil seemed more relevant.

    I do also wonder if there's something to be said about when most of the housing stock was constructed. I'd guess that well over half of the homes in Texas were built after 1980, and it seems that most of those houses were built by big corporate homebuilders who are mostly motivated by maximizing the bottom line. And, as you rightly point out, adding basements adds to construction costs.

    I grew up in West Texas in the 1970s and '80s and only had one buddy whose house had a full basement. I can't think of any others, but the area was kind of hilly, so there were a lot of those split-level homes, though.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  7. 1 hour ago, HotSauce said:

    Kind of beautiful how the typical hard line liberals who attack anything that isnt blatant leftist groupthink are shutting the fuck up in this thread. 

    This "hard line liberal" created this thread specifically to give you a safe place to vent so that the UT news thread would get unfucked.

    You're welcome.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 2
  8. 2 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

    It would destroy Texas’s economy.  And I mean destroy it. There would be so many million- and billion-dollar companies that would have to fold or shrink way down.  Hell, a shitload of local six-figure companies would go under as well. People truly do not realize how the economy in Texas works.  Quite a few family farm and ranches would find themselves being sold off by the banks.

    I’ve told relatives who espouse this shit just what it would mean - imagine replacing the Mexican who mows their lawn or puts a new roof on their house with an “American” who wants twice as much (or more) money and half-as-many hours,nor the Honduran who changes the oil or tires on their truck, or the Guatemalan who harvests the tomatoes they eat, or the Mexican who brings their food out at the restaurant, or the Nicaraguan who works the kitchen there, or the Brazilian who fucks their wife or daughter, or the Panamanian or Costa Rican who cleans the hotel room they stay in, or the Mexican who cleans their home, or the Guatemalan who cleans the bathrooms and empties the trash at work, or the Venezuelan or Salvadoran that repaves the street in their area or helps build their dream home - imagine replacing all of those jobs and many more with Americans with 2-3 the price of non-Americans, and probably higher because the labor market will be turbofucked,  Not to mention all of the businesses that sell to these people, that would also go under.

    This is the problem I see with a lot of "conservatives" I know: they don't think shit through. I put quotes around "conservative" because they're actually just knee-jerk reactionaries. Yours is a great example.

    • Another would be the lower-my-taxes-no-matter-what crowd (Roads will crumble, yo. That fire truck won't pay for itself.).
    • Or the I-want-God-back-in-school (Are you sure you want *their* god in your kid's school?).
    • And the people-shouldn't-be-on-welfare folks (Cool. So, are you willing to have your mother-in-law, who's on social security, move in with you?).

    I imagine most of them are really shitty chess players, as they can't seem to think more than a step or two ahead.

    Of course, this applies to some liberals as well, mostly younger people, but the majority of them eventually grow out of it.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
  9. 5 minutes ago, Skipper said:

    Unfortunately it was just a livestream.  I was doing a search to see if anydrama was occurring today and came across it and got sucked in for a bit. Will look to see if any video later.  To be clear, most of what I could hear was very tame but definitely not open to any discussion around the edges and the point about the IDF and APD was just WTF.  The audio wasn't great so maybe I missed some context.

    I don't know the extent of it or its history, and I can't speak to its veracity, but a very quick (and cursory) Google search led me to this article, which mentions Austin as one of the participating police forces. This is the first I can ever recall hearing about any of this.

    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-us-police-training-end-knee-neck-protests

     

    • Like 1
  10. 5 minutes ago, Mikey4 said:

    I'll check it, thank you. I've been posting on the football board for 6+ years, and shaggy before that, and hornfans before that. I've had no problems with negs or hostility on there.

     

    4 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    It's always funny to read posts like this then go and see the types of posts that actually get dogpiled in CR.

    I'm not saying negs or fatwas don't happen in the CR, but it's not nearly as commonplace as perceived. It's mostly restricted to posters persistently spouting disproven lies, stating malignant opinions as facts without evidence, or saying racist/homophobic kind of shit, just like anywhere else on this board. The difference is that, by its political nature, the CR attracts people who like to stir the pot with that stuff.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  11. 7 minutes ago, Mikey4 said:

    I don't follow. I was agreeing with Nicole that people are disuaded from posting in CR and to some extent DT due to tribalism and a rush to neg rather than engage in a debate. There is certainly some good faith debate and discussion, but the extremists make it unpleasant.

    I invite you to visit the Hartzell thread in CR, which discusses this very topic. It's six pages of debate/discussion/dissent, with lots of back-and-forth. Having just skimmed the entire thing just now, I counted 1 "fuck you" emoji. I'll also ask you to look at the last page, where one poster came in well over an hour ago with a flaming hot take on the current president of the US (not the university). Guess what? Not a single neg.

    Here's a link if you'd like to check for yourself: https://www.surlyhorns.com/board/topic/35367-jay-hartzell-is-not-out-standard/page/6/

    If you're really concerned about avoiding neg reps on this site, I'd suggest never, ever visiting the Football board.

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  12. 49 minutes ago, texasdago said:

    Re: parking, we could do more of this... you end up with covered spaces for cars and generate power at the same time...

    https://e360.yale.edu/features/putting-solar-panels-atop-parking-lots-a-green-energy-solution

    image.thumb.png.8d0ae76c8aba02260908dbb9f8a3dff4.png

    I like parking on the roof of the blue parking garage at the Airport.  I get covered parking with an easy to find location and the combined panels generate 1.8 megawatts of power.   When I lived in Houston, I would park on the roof of Terminal E and I would come back to a car that was a furnace.

     

    Our froggy amis sont d'accord.

    Quote

     

    All large car parks in France will be covered by solar panels under new legislation approved as part of president Emmanuel Macron’s renewable energy drive.

    Legislation approved by the French Senate this week requires existing and new car parks with space for at least 80 vehicles to be covered by solar panels.

    The owners of car parks with between 80 and 400 spaces have five years to comply with the measures, while operators of those with more than 400 will have just three years. At least half of the area of the larger sites must be covered by solar panels.

    The French government believes the measure could generate up to 11 gigawatts of power.

     

     

  13. 25 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

    Begs the obvious question who are they and releasing their identities....which I doubt happens as no charges have been filed

    Are you unfamiliar with the mugshot thread? I'm sure a lot of them end up with no charges.

  14. 6 minutes ago, Skipper said:

    It's just fucking lawyers being lawyers.  Getting everyone stuck in minutiae instead of focusing on the big picture or the reality of the situation because it suits their politics.

    Like wearing surgical masks?

    • Haha 1
  15. 1 hour ago, HendersonHorns said:

    I think this one goes with your examples. 
     

     

     

    1 hour ago, lucious leftfoot said:

    Exactly. 
     

    I’m sure a sizable percentage of the participants saw what happened at Columbia last night and thought, oh cool.  
     

    You should go join them. This obviously means a lot to you. We could use some boots on the ground reporting. 

     

    1 hour ago, lucious leftfoot said:

    Do you think it has nothing to do with protests “sticking” and escalating on campuses around the country? I think Hartzell didn’t want the hassle, embarrassment and ultimately danger of a potential tent city of militant protestors established on campus. Columbia is a bit of a vindication for him honestly. Hands off and disregarding the rules leads to fucked up shit happening. 
     

    Maybe those guys know to follow the rules around protesting?  I have no idea but they do wear nice, pressed khakis with a tucked in polo.

     

    39 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    If anyone thinks the situation at Columbia has gotten to where it is now because officials ignored it you haven't paid any attention to it. Officials there escalated the situation same as Hartzell did at UT.

     

    36 minutes ago, Longhornfan1024 said:

    Brisket, you're an attorney and you know better than this.  There is a difference between what a private university like Chicago or Northwestern can do and what a public university like UT can do.  If UT chooses not to enforce its rules against this group because they are protesting for a 'good cause' then UT can't enforce its rules against any group.  Otherwise, that would be viewpoint-based discrimination in violation of the first amendment.  It's all or nothing when it comes to enforcing the rules as a public institution, and it sounds like this group intended to and did violate UT's rules.    

     

    It's becoming increasingly difficult to muddle through all the various hot takes about other places to find information about what's happening on OUR university campus. Anyone who'd like to discuss protests NOT taking place on the UT campus, please feel free to do so in this brand new thread.

    Thank you.

    • Hook 'Em 6
    • Like 1
    • Drool 1
  16. Let's see if we can sum up the events of the last few days:

    • Today, some protestors may or may not have violated a poorly worded campus rule about tents before 10 p.m.
    • Some of those protestors also violated a brand new campus rule about not wearing masks.
    • In response, riot police were called in to promptly clear them out.
    • At the same time, the university is violating a five-year-old law affirmatively stating that non-students are allowed to protest on college campuses.
    • All this on the heels of last week, when riot police physically assaulted protesters exercising their First Amendment rights.
    • Meanwhile, in our little corner of the internet, we have at least one lawyer (and vocal Christian) saying these campus rules must be fully enforced. At the same time, he simultaneously maintains a stance in support of illegal actions by a foreign government, such as ethnic cleansing and other war crimes.
    • Also, we have a few other posters that have expressed a desire to see police be even rougher on campus protesters up to and including "cracking skulls," no matter that the children of other posters currently attend the university.
    • Finally, we have a local journalist/cameraman who tripped into an officer, an accident for which DPS is aggressively pursuing charges after the local DA declined to do so.

    Is any of the above incorrect?

    • Hook 'Em 6
    • Like 1
  17. 1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

    Like others, I feel good about Wisconsin becuase of the people in control of the state government and the new maps should galvanize voters, mostly D. But maybe I'm overly optimistic.  

    Yeah, I understand feeling that way because it lessens the chance of any hijinx. For whatever reason, though, my gut just tells me to not trust Wisconsin.

×
×
  • Create New...