Jump to content

Had Enough

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    4110
  • Joined

Everything posted by Had Enough

  1. Your beliefs are obviously opinions so not necessarily wrong, but I’ll provide some counterpoints. I reference PFF quite often for several reasons. It allows for measurement relative to peers. Keep in mind that their overall pass blocking and run blocking grades include all persons not just the Oline. And with that consideration, our TEs based on what I’ve noted in the past are not great relative to their peers. Last year, Texas graded out number 2 in pass blocking, number 46 in run blocking. In 2023, that was number 3 and 54, respectively. For 2024, let’s take a look at the opposing Run Ds. We played 3 of the top 5 then 4 of the top 10 graded Run Ds. Then UGA twice at 12. Then 3 others in the top 20. Overall our blocking grade 4th in the SEC one spot behind Georgia. Our SEC schedule may not have the toughest, but we had OSU, Michigan and a 2nd game versus UGA to counter that. UGA graded 17th in pass blocking to go with 45th in run blocking. The Ohio State was 102nd and 41st. Both teams had several Olinemen drafted. Only the Texas pass coverage rated higher relative to its peers than pass protection. I’d wager the Run D grade for respective DBs trails their pass coverage similar to the run blocking. Also relatively speaking, our offenses job was more difficult than the defenses last year. You see it in the numbers, relative OFEI, DFEI, and sheer number of draft picks. You can certainly make an argument were a better pass blocking unit. Every player out there has relative strengths and weaknesses so you do have to pick a preference as to your strength. Those guys were pretty damn good. And likely one of the best units in the country with some limitations/injuries in the skill positions behind them.
  2. At least bowling is not subjective scoring. But the art of dancing on ice is………….actually pretty damn skillful.
  3. Understood. I was going a little deeper based on what I’d read up to your post.
  4. @jimmyjazz let’s make sure we’re clear on one thing. Bowling is not a sport. But I do keep some mental receipts. If I’m different in this regard, I can live with it.
  5. OSU didn’t rush particularly well against us. They had a 22 yarder and an 18 yarder (pretty sure we screwed up our alignment here). We had the dumb playcall resulting in a loss of 7 otherwise Wisner/Blue were at 4 YPC. You are correct in that you won’t dominate every game. Certainly not equal in the running and passing game. Every once in awhile, you’ll run into a TVondre Sweat type. Has it ever been normal? Maybe with unlimited scholarships. I’d wager no team exists with game ready 3rd team OTs. It’s pretty simple. Your 3rd team tackles are almost never on the field barring injury. If they aren’t still in the developmental phase, they’re likely never going to see substantial time. Often, the lesser of your 2nd team tackles will not see the field because the best will likely rotate between RT and LT. If it goes to shit and both 1st teamers go down, many teams will move a G to T before running out a 3rd teamer. I’d say it is rare to have more than 8 guys that are trusted. Sark has been quite good at managing the depth, but it is not reality to expect 3 deep at all positions because of the cost, player mobility between programs and playing time. And OL has the least amount of player rotation maybe of any position but QB.
  6. Yep. I think part of that was the picks. A big one for a TD was in part because Guilbeau blitzed, had a relatively clean shot and whiffed. Smith rolled right then 4.29 Golden simply ran away from Thompson. That one was not a pick, but there were several including a long one from inside their 20 to inside ours.
  7. I think someone had a bit of a theory about that. I don’t recall it being well received.
  8. As codaxx said Barron was out the first half and Watts didn’t play. Our pass rush was ineffective. Holgerson had some somewhat unique pick plays. They spread us out pretty well and took advantage.
  9. I’m just assuming that’s a given right now so everyone keep it up.
  10. I saw that. The board harped on the checkdowns/short passing game quite a bit during the season. It’s also a counter to “make all the throws” because at some point the defense will gameplan and react to what you’re doing rather than what you theoretically can do. With respect to Quinn and checking down, it is possible he was doing as instructed even if he was a bit quick in doing so. It may be a reach but with the expanded schedule Sark was conscious of not extending his defense too much. So did that make him more conservative in looking to extend drives over quick strikes?
  11. His numbers and PFF grading were somewhat mediocre. Syracuse had quite a few injuries upfront too. He was better at the run game than rushing the passer. Obviously, the surrounding parts are much greater here so he’ll be able to play to his strengths and with rotational parts he can play his ass off every play. I would contrast him to January as to your point. Flip their teams and January could have been frosh all American and Watson sitting behind 4 incredibly experienced guys. This is the advantage Sark has built with the depth. A guy like Watson can drop his snap count from 75% to 45% (whatever those numbers are) to stay fresh but also he’ll get to be more situationally suited for success because he’s not the only guy.
  12. This thread has taken an odd twist. But it’s entertaining. I almost hope it lives forever. And I think Quinn represents what many fans and even experts struggle with when it comes to sports. It may also be Sarks limiting factor to get over the hump. I believe Sark was still on the mantra of “he can make all the throws” when the draft happened. That ASU throw on 4th and 13 was a great counter to that. The throw itself was far from great but the result was great. Any college QB can make that throw in practice. It was the presnap work that made the play. And it was catchable, which is all that was needed in that moment. We are at a point in which we need to make best use of our resources. We don’t need all the throws. Just get those resources opportunities. The consistency of that effort makes it work.
  13. It’s a bit of an odd feeling for me. I’m not paying attention to the hype but can’t imagine losing 3 and/or not making the playoffs. Perhaps the hype is internally created. The last two years I’ve paid less attention to recruiting than I have in 30+ years. But I’m all in on us winning it all. Now, what I do take as true, based on reports is how hard this team works. There’s no way for me to confirm that. And, yeah, that will result in us beating the crap out of multiple teams. The UTEPs and the SHSUs will be a slight step in excitement from a spring game.
  14. I found some humor there. It still is open for Ewers. The accuracy wasn’t good, but the bigger part may be the coaches view of his decision-making.
  15. Yet Wingo had 2 TDs, Livingstone several longer receptions, Wisner had some good runs, the TEs caught some balls and looked like the best group. Baxter was somehow getting a goalline carry. McC had a TD but presumably from Caldwell. Goosby didn’t play much but neither did some other guys. RT is banged up. So I was told. Now if the first team O had 2/3 TDs presumably in what a half of football. Maybe more than that but I’d think not 11 or 12 possessions like a full game. Familiarity works to the Ds advantage. Maybe that’s not terrible.
  16. Undefeated is unlikely due to the number of games. But playoff elimination starts at 3 SEC losses. Two SEC losses and a loss at OSU might do it. We will likely be a top, if not top, 3 loss team in playoff consideration. Alabama, UGa have new QBs. As do OSU, Oregon. Some of those are rebuilding their Olines. While we may having 4 new starters, our 3 potential interior guys have worked for 4 years with each other.
  17. What else would you call NOT going 26-31 w/4 TDs and 300+ yards?
  18. No ill will intended. I was leaving it open for me to be wrong because I’d thought differently for some time.
  19. This I find funny. This too, but you get a lot of ass kissing on here so I’m hesitant to give you a 🤘. It’s 97% of the football talk that I am not fan of. Not really, maybe 20%, people are full of shit.
  20. They do. Cause they’re talented and good. Sarks offense and the 11 he puts out are solid enough to allow those skills to shine. After the 8 games in the SEC regular season, the University of Texas had the highest yards per carry of any SEC team. It dropped to 3rd after adding the 9th game. Also keep in mind, our QB was a net negative on that YPC whereas to name a few - Jackson Arnold, Milroe, Pavia, Dart, Nico - other teams QBs were at least positive on the season. Individually Wisner was #3 in conference games at YPC. Sometimes we struggle with the rare concept that a player is equally as good at run blocking as they are pass blocking. I can’t imagine you find that many do pick your preference. And that displacing a good to great DT is simply not a frequent occurrence. When you play a UGA or an OSU or a Texas, you simply aren’t going to over power them on the interior too often. And when you get in the red zone and are playing 9 on 11, it makes that run a bit more difficult. We may be better at running on the interior, but the truth is Hutson has played enough and has yet to show he’s a better player. As for going under C, maybe that’s the reason. Could be the preference of the QB. Who knows.
  21. League rules permit the Broncos and other teams to dress an emergency third quarterback on game days and not have them count towards the active roster. Saw this referenced in an article about Sam. Not sure if that means the active roster + plus 1 QB each week but assume so. —————————————— So they have to be on the 53 man roster but can suit out as the 49th player of the 48 active player roster as long as 1 and QBs are active. https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-emergency-third-quarterback-rule-questions-and-answers
  22. He needs to quit making Theo Wease look good.
  23. I cramped up at lunch. At the table. For no apparent reason.
×
×
  • Create New...