Jump to content

956 Worldwide

Full Members
  • Posts

    10374
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by 956 Worldwide

  1. Posting cringe to own the libs.
  2. Theologically and in praxis Judaism and Islam are the brothers and Christianity is a cousin. That’s on everything from strict monotheistic unity, understanding of divine revelation, the overlapping relationship between legal and religious obligations, methods of belonging to the religious group, and the role of the sovereign in community of faith. Fundamentally, Judaism and Islam are both comprehensively designed to provide structure and governance to a culturally unified religio-political community in a pre-national sense. Christianity’s foundational centuries were spent working out methods on how a non-unified community of belief could survive and accommodate itself while existing within defined political entities, which expressed varying degrees of tolerance to the new group. The concept of “secularism” as it emerged from the world of late antiquity is fundamentally Christian and not shared with Islam or Judaism. Rex, your experience of Jews as more culturally similar to Christians is just a reflection of Jews as a diaspora people and Jews in the West were shaped by centuries of exchange with Christians. MENA Jews or Ethiopian Jews would strike you as much different, also because of centuries of exchange with Islam or other forms of Christianity.
  3. OK now the signal is getting fuzzy. Do not like.
  4. I’m not sure and leaning to disagree on this. I can for sure make a more compelling case that an Iranian nuke is more damaging to non-proliferation than preventing an Iranian nuke via kinetic means is. This MAY hurt non-proliferation but an Iranian bomb means a certain Saudi bomb almost immediately. There are many countries in the world for whom building a nuclear weapon would be significantly easier than it ever was for Iran and none of them seem to be racing to build them. They’ve all been able to cover their bases against regime change via a combo of alliances, conventional security, and most relevantly, responsible behavior. Nuclear blackmail and brinksmanship of the type Iran engage(d) in is useful to a certain type of regime: an aggressively revisionist, destabilizing, aspiring regional power with the conventional balance of power against it. And not many of those exist. Iran, North Korea are kind of it. Japan is not watching this and starting its program although it would be a trivial problem for them. U.S. signaling here is also important. Limited strikes and a request for direct negotiations with the Ayatollah is a clear sign of the intent of the action and a de facto recognition of the regime’s legitimacy. The far more damaging case for proliferation is Ukraine, where a nuclear power aggressively attacked a small neighbor with the explicit goal of territory and regime change, while using nuclear blackmail to fend off the world. That’s the situation that will make Tokyo, Seoul, or Riyadh begin to reassess if the U.S. guarantee becomes threadbare. Not the example of Iran. You know, the nuclear-power war of aggression that Anastasis really supports.
  5. I agree at this point, the preparations needed for a ground operation in Iran would be unmistakable and obvious and the initial strikes would be very different. Right now, it’s not even being contemplated. This was much less extensive than Clinton’s 1998 bombing of Iraq that did not result in chaos or regime change. Neither did the bombings of Belgrade. Regimes are more resilient that they seem and not even the named targets make sense if that is the goal.
  6. There is some diplomatic signaling to this. It’s glaring that he did not announce a sustained campaign (like Israel did), nor did he announce this was a one and done (although this could serve as such an announcement). The ambiguity is almost for sure deliberate to allow other options and to give Iran an exit. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
  7. I do think Elon is dumb on a lot of things, but I think he understands this. He’s signaling to his idiot base that he’s going to “unwoke” Grok in a way they understand
  8. Elon is really mad at Grok because of Catturd2 and typing that sentence makes me want to go back in time to make sure the Sea People defeat the Pharaoh so we can avoid this.
  9. He just wants grok to remove all references to his dysfunctional penile implant.
  10. Kinda curious about the missing information from the entire corpus of human knowledge that Elon has. Is it really missing then? I guess its like the Elron corollary to Schroedinger’s cat in that its unknown until Elron voices it.
  11. He argues around it but never quite gets there: Iran is unlikely to use a nuclear weapon against Israel, which would guarantee likely nuclear response. But, a nuclear-armed Iran would absolutely seek to rebuild its Shia militias and proxies in the region to pursue its revisionist aims. And with its own nuclear shield, it would be basically immune from direct retaliation and adversaries dealing with its hybrid and proxy tactics would be restrained to countering those entities and responding within the gray zone. Iran would also have a free hand to intervene conventionally in the region. Basically, the Kremlin playbook. And that also explains why other Muslim states are willing to sit this out with some quiet support to Israel. With Iran’s proxies aside from the Houthis basically defanged, this is the window to make them an un-problem for a while.
  12. Investing all my savings to build section 8 housing 200 miles outside of Cheyenne.
  13. He was on Real World vs. Road Rules when I was in high school and he is dogshit. He may be right or wrong on lone items but for anyone with more than a lone BB rattling around their dome, it’s usually a safe bet to take the opposite of his stance absent Independent knowledge and reasoning.
  14. Theo Von is forty-five years old and once told the LSU student newspaper he was opposed to inter-racial dating but yeah let me hear his thoughts on geopolitics.
  15. Me deboarding a plane: Efficient. Athletic, almost graceful, economy of effort as I remove my carryon and continue down the aisle in one smooth motion. Ready to move when my time comes. All other people: Bumbling clods. Stupidly shuffling their items, pulling bags onto their own heads. Halfwits who cannot understand when it is their turn. Not ready for the jet age.
  16. Furiously using ChatGPT so I’ll get dumber because honestly that seems like the way to survive the 2020s.
  17. Just moving those bombers can be signaling. I don’t think there’s been a final decision yet but there is the intent of showing that one can be made anytime.
  18. Imagine all the things that have to go wrong to be capable of feeling let down by Tulsi Gabbard.
  19. I think there’s plenty of room for ambiguity and skepticism on this but “I can’t believe Tulsi might lie to us all” is a bonkers take.
  20. I am disturbed at this thread. People are saying bless you for coughs? “Get untracked” like it is a good thing? Are you all mingling too much with the deltas and epsilons?
  21. Its been a tough campaign but I have brought down Ana de Armas’ defenses, paving the way for some large scale operations in her territory.
  22. Yeah, the US would be happy to have a free, secular, and stable Iran. But you run into a similar thing to the debaathification problem in that any semblance of civil society or technocratic ability has been concentrated in the clerical-military repression apparatus. There’s no bench or shadow opposition to step in and do it.
×
×
  • Create New...