Jump to content

956 Worldwide

Full Members
  • Posts

    10382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by 956 Worldwide

  1. Anastasis literally bringing up someone who has been dead for almost seven years before finding a critique for the people actually running things is so on brand.
  2. Lets stop and appreciate the masterclass in peace deal making that Steve Witkoff has shown with Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Iran.
  3. Likely to be now some more ordered departures. Israel says the operation will last “weeks.”
  4. It does if the plane is on a treadmill.
  5. There is going to be a bunch of terrible information based on local coverage. South Asian media is AWFUL. They shared a passenger manifest before NOK got contacted. Wait for an international source to confirm anything.
  6. Seeing that video, I think everyone knew what was coming. It stalled all the way to the ground. Terrifying and people absolutely could feel that the ground was not moving the way it was supposed to.
  7. NYPD has liaisons in Israel and not a building or center. They have the same type of programs in about a dozen other countries worldwide including in the Middle East. They are in places where intell sharing can thwart terror and transnational crime. There’s a subset here that uncritically regurgitates false/misleading information on anything Israel related.
  8. I think this is the first 787 hull loss? Early footage shows landing gear down and struggling to gain altitude.
  9. Its likely to go down but not all the embassies are evacuated. Baghdad is sending home non-essential staff. Bahrain and Kuwait are offering evac to families if they want it.
  10. Embassy Baghdad is drawing down all non-critical staff, others are evacuating families, and others called emergency action committee meetings. Lots of indicators that Iran-Israel is about to pop off in a big way.
  11. I was glad to see this thread bumped for Gabbard’s craziness. And delighted to see Ana simping out for her as expected. A few thoughts: - Who produced this? Its clearly well done. It went out on her personal accounts. Its not branded by ODNI or the IC. Usually its out of the ordinary for senior intelligence officials to give their personal thoughts on foreign policy to the public but I guess we are doing this now? - You know what didn’t get mentioned? Donald Trump or the cabinet that she serves in. Not even an acknowledgment that she is part of it. That’s kind of weird. - Who are the political elite warmongers that are pushing us to nuclear war? Is the cabinet-level intelligence official not part of the political elite? Was this info considered for the PDB or was X a more effective vector? - You’re the goddamned DNI, Tulsi! If anyone gets a bunker it’s you! Shouldn’t you be telling us what you’re doing about the incoming catastrophe? What is the point of telling us this? We have the equivalent of the pilot coming on the intercom and warning that he’s going to fly the plane into a mountain plane unless the good people in Economy Select figure something out. The reality: Tulsi got excluded from the top foreign policy team that went to Camp David to talk Iran. She was excluded because she is crazy and unreliable and was simply given a title and a platform as a sop to the Anastasis electorate. No one was ever going to take her seriously and her job is to feed sixty five year old docs into AI to keep the nutjob caucus engaged. So good job, Ana, you got played. You utter fucking child.
  12. We are about to start ramping up flights to Guantanamo. We already have close to 10k in the pipelines. Stated reason is to ease overcrowding in US facilities. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/10/trump-plans-migrants-guantanamo-bay-00396673 A big part of this is just messaging. Warning the world we will stuff you in GITMO for not having papers. Its time for all to admit that the libs were absolutely right that W’s decisions would be expanded and weaponized.
  13. Its the goal. This sets up raids in neighborhoods and charges for not showing up.
  14. The army is basically organized around the BCT, so any almost any time army units are deployed they will be elements of a BCT. That said, this is a clear provocation. The admin feels above water on immigration and knows that the military is popular. He wants to have the image of protesters fighting uniforms.
  15. The admin is absolutely trying to provoke conflict. Immigration is the one issue where they are still above water and the military is one of the few institutions that is still deeply trusted. They are craving images of masked people, maybe waving foreign flags, in a conflict with uniformed troops. It’s a provocation.
  16. Massive attack on Kyiv tonight, per some friends I’m texting with. Might be the “response.”
  17. Does Kreuz do briskets? I seem to remember they did clod? I haven’t been since the mid-2000s.
  18. A return to just funding NASA to build rockets would be a best case scenario but I guarantee Bezos has already called to make Truth integrated with Amazon prime.
  19. Looks like Graham is taking that post as a go-ahead to move the bill. Thune and the Senate had been waiting for DJT to give the nod.
  20. Usually this would be via immigration court. A real judge has right to see this if there is a question. Announcing it all on Truth likely guarantees the intervention if anyone is tracking the real motivation here.
  21. It’s a screenshot. The bill is one that imposes significant new sanctions but most importantly 500 percent tariffs on nations importing Russian energy. Has 80 co-sponsors in the Senate. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/05/29/congress-russia-sanctions-trump-putin/
  22. Reposting a May 29 op-ed with this quote. Seems it might be the sign Congress needs to move the Senate bill.
  23. I think this is being framed wrong, largely because of the way the admin communicates. But at its heart, deportation or removal is not a punishment or punitive proceeding. That is well established for decades, as is the principle that the standard is not the same as criminal proceedings. Assuming things are as reported, here is the logic tree: 1. An administrative stay of removal is just that, administrative. It in no way implies a broader right to remain in the U.S. and does not foreshadow a favorable decision on the claim. 2. The father has clearly demonstrated that his claim to asylum is invalid and not in the interests of the United States. 3. Under the law, any dependents attached to his claim are decided in lines with the principal applicant. 4. People with denied asylum claims are either removed expeditiously or referred to an immigration court for removal. To be very blunt: The argument any of these dependents has a right to stay is the one that needs to be made. Legally, the case is far more easily made that they should be removed.
×
×
  • Create New...